The effect of dynamic contrast magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in the diagnosis of breast cancer cases

Arkın Akalın; Hasan Acar

Makale detayları

The effect of dynamic contrast magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in the diagnosis of breast cancer cases

Yazarlar:

Arkın Akalın | Hasan Acar

Yayıncı:

Pamukkale University

Ana Başlıklar:

Radyoloji ve Organ Görüntüleme

Dergi:

Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi Vol.16 Issue 2, pp.222-228

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001281303

pISSN:

1308-0865

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of dynamic contrast magnetic resonance imaging DCE-MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer BC and to compare it with ultrasonography USG. Materials and methods: In our study, 78 patients who underwent preoperative DCE-MRI and USG in our diagnosis center in TRNC between 2009 and 2022 and were diagnosed with BC histopathologically were investigated retrospectively.Findings obtained according to the BI-RADS classification in both methods, detection of BC, detection of tumor foci TF in multiple tumors multicentric and multifocal tumors MT, correct diagnosis rates CDRs in invasive lobular cancers ILC and invasive ductal cancers IDC were compared and the results were evaluated statistically. Results: The mean age of the ILC and MT cases was found to be significantly lower than the IDC and unifocal tumorUF cases p0.05. CDRs in BC cases; 94.8 of DCE-MRI, 78.2 of USG p0.05, in the detection of TFs; 94.5 of DCE-MRI, 73.6 of USG p0.05, in detecting ILC cases; DCE-MRI 87.5, USG 37.5 p0.05 in detecting IDC cases; it was determined as 95.7 in DCE-MRI and 80.2 in USG p0.05. Conclusion: DCE-MRI is a more effective diagnostic method than USG in the diagnosis of BC cases and TFs in MT cases.

 Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of dynamic contrast magnetic resonance imaging DCE-MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer BC and to compare it with ultrasonography USG. Materials and methods: In our study, 78 patients who underwent preoperative DCE-MRI and USG in our diagnosis center in TRNC between 2009 and 2022 and were diagnosed with BC histopathologically were investigated retrospectively.Findings obtained according to the BI-RADS classification in both methods, detection of BC, detection of tumor foci TF in multiple tumors multicentric and multifocal tumors MT, correct diagnosis rates CDRs in invasive lobular cancers ILC and invasive ductal cancers IDC were compared and the results were evaluated statistically. Results: The mean age of the ILC and MT cases was found to be significantly lower than the IDC and unifocal tumorUF cases p0.05. CDRs in BC cases; 94.8 of DCE-MRI, 78.2 of USG p0.05, in the detection of TFs; 94.5 of DCE-MRI, 73.6 of USG p0.05, in detecting ILC cases; DCE-MRI 87.5, USG 37.5 p0.05 in detecting IDC cases; it was determined as 95.7 in DCE-MRI and 80.2 in USG p0.05. Conclusion: DCE-MRI is a more effective diagnostic method than USG in the diagnosis of BC cases and TFs in MT cases.

 Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of dynamic contrast magnetic resonance imaging DCE-MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer BC and to compare it with ultrasonography USG. Materials and methods: In our study, 78 patients who underwent preoperative DCE-MRI and USG in our diagnosis center in TRNC between 2009 and 2022 and were diagnosed with BC histopathologically were investigated retrospectively.Findings obtained according to the BI-RADS classification in both methods, detection of BC, detection of tumor foci TF in multiple tumors multicentric and multifocal tumors MT, correct diagnosis rates CDRs in invasive lobular cancers ILC and invasive ductal cancers IDC were compared and the results were evaluated statistically. Results: The mean age of the ILC and MT cases was found to be significantly lower than the IDC and unifocal tumorUF cases p0.05. CDRs in BC cases; 94.8 of DCE-MRI, 78.2 of USG p0.05, in the detection of TFs; 94.5 of DCE-MRI, 73.6 of USG p0.05, in detecting ILC cases; DCE-MRI 87.5, USG 37.5 p0.05 in detecting IDC cases; it was determined as 95.7 in DCE-MRI and 80.2 in USG p0.05. Conclusion: DCE-MRI is a more effective diagnostic method than USG in the diagnosis of BC cases and TFs in MT cases.

 Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı meme kanseri MK tanısında; dinamik kontrastlı manyetik rezonans görüntülemenin DCE-MRI etkisini araştırmak ve ultrasonografi USG ile karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve yöntem: Çalışmamızda 2009 ve 2022 yılları arasında KKTC deki tanı merkezimizde preoperative olarak DCE-MRI ve USG yapılan ve histopatolojik olarak MK tanısı konulan 78 olgu retrospektif olarak araştırılmıştır. Olgularda her iki yöntemde Bİ-RADS sınıflamasına göre elde edilen bulgular; MK tespiti, multipl tümörlerde multisentrik ve multifocal tümör MT tümör odaklarının TO tespitinde, invaziv lobüler kanserlerde İLK ve invaziv duktal kanserlerde İDK doğru tanı oranları karşılaştırılmış, sonuçlar istatistiksel olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: İLK ve MT olgularının yaş ortalaması, İDK ve tek odaklı tümör TOT olgularına göre anlamlı ölçüde küçük bulunmuştur p0,05. DTO ları MK olgularında; DCE-MRIın 94,8, USGnin 78,2 p0,05, TO larının tespitinde; DCE-MRIın 94,5, USGnin 73,6 p0.05, İLK olgularını saptamada; DCE-MRIın 87,5, USGnin 37,5 p0,05, İDK olgularını saptamada; DCE-MRIın 95,7, USGnin80,2 p0,05 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç: DCE-MRI, MK olgularının ve MT olgularında TOların tanısında USGye göre daha etkili bir tanı yöntemidir.

Makale detayları

The effect of dynamic contrast magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in the diagnosis of breast cancer cases

Yazarlar:

Arkın Akalın | Hasan Acar

Yayıncı:

Pamukkale University

Ana Başlıklar:

Radyoloji ve Organ Görüntüleme

Dergi:

Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi Vol.16 Issue 2, pp.222-228

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001281303

pISSN:

1308-0865

Magnetic resonance with dynamic contrast

breast cancer

multiple tumors

ultrasonography

Dinamik kontrastlı manyetik rezonans

meme kanseri

multipl tümör

ultrasonografi.

ultrasonografi

Dinamik kontrastlı manyetik rezonans

meme kanseri

multipl tümör

ultrasonografi

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Arkın Akalın | Hasan Acar

Yayıncı: Pamukkale University

Ana Başlıklar: Radyoloji ve Organ Görüntüleme

Dergi: Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi Vol.16 Issue 2, pp.222-228

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 5/2023

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001281303

pISSN: 1308-0865

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Arkın Akalın | Hasan Acar

Yayıncı:

Pamukkale University

Ana Başlıklar:

Radyoloji ve Organ Görüntüleme

Dergi:

Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi Vol.16 Issue 2, pp.222-228

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001281303

pISSN:

1308-0865