In Terms of Compilation, Review and Meaning Orientation The Difference in Syntax between Hafs and Şu'be's Narrations from Âsım and Its Meaning and Its Effect on Guidance

Hüseyin Yusuf

Makale detayları

In Terms of Compilation, Review and Meaning Orientation The Difference in Syntax between Hafs and Şu'be's Narrations from Âsım and Its Meaning and Its Effect on Guidance

Yazarlar:

Hüseyin Yusuf

Yayıncı:

Kirikkale University

Dergi:

Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Vol.13 Issue 1, pp.335-351

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001283529

pISSN:

2146-2879

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 This research is based on examining the differences between the narrations of Şube and Hafs in terms of syntax. In the research, the differences in îrâb the science that studies the last vowel point of words between the two narrations on the whole of the Quran were observed and the two narrations were compared based on this. By explaining the effect of this difference of îrâb on the difference in meaning, both narrations are presented in terms of syntax. The study focuses on the possible îrâbî aspects mentioned in the basic language and interpretation books and other works, then examines them and deals with them; carefully examines the issue and discusses it in detail in order to prefer one point of view over the others. All these have been done in accordance with the rules and foundations of syntax and its priorities in preference. Here, there is a point of view that is more distinguished than the others in terms of strength, as it is based on the strongest of the two schools and the strongest of the two paths. Then, there are the opinions of the researcher, which he adds to the end of each issue by strengthening it with evidence and the rules of removing evidence. The review is divided into two chapters: The first chapter deals with the mekkî revealed in Mecca verses in which the difference between the narrations of Hafs and Şube is mentioned, in terms of syntax. The second chapter deals with the medenî verses revealed in Medina in which the difference between the two narrations is mentioned. In this review, the complementary method was followed; then the most important conclusions of the researcher and the most important recommendations to the review were added; sources and references have been identified.

 This research is based on examining the differences between the narrations of Şube and Hafs in terms of syntax. In the research, the differences in îrâb the science that studies the last vowel point of words between the two narrations on the whole of the Quran were observed and the two narrations were compared based on this. By explaining the effect of this difference of îrâb on the difference in meaning, both narrations are presented in terms of syntax. The study focuses on the possible îrâbî aspects mentioned in the basic language and interpretation books and other works, then examines them and deals with them; carefully examines the issue and discusses it in detail in order to prefer one point of view over the others. All these have been done in accordance with the rules and foundations of syntax and its priorities in preference. Here, there is a point of view that is more distinguished than the others in terms of strength, as it is based on the strongest of the two schools and the strongest of the two paths. Then, there are the opinions of the researcher, which he adds to the end of each issue by strengthening it with evidence and the rules of removing evidence. The review is divided into two chapters: The first chapter deals with the mekkî revealed in Mecca verses in which the difference between the narrations of Hafs and Şube is mentioned, in terms of syntax. The second chapter deals with the medenî verses revealed in Medina in which the difference between the two narrations is mentioned. In this review, the complementary method was followed; then the most important conclusions of the researcher and the most important recommendations to the review were added; sources and references have been identified.

 This research is based on examining the differences between the narrations of Şube and Hafs in terms of syntax. In the research, the differences in îrâb the science that studies the last vowel point of words between the two narrations on the whole of the Quran were observed and the two narrations were compared based on this. By explaining the effect of this difference of îrâb on the difference in meaning, both narrations are presented in terms of syntax. The study focuses on the possible îrâbî aspects mentioned in the basic language and interpretation books and other works, then examines them and deals with them; carefully examines the issue and discusses it in detail in order to prefer one point of view over the others. All these have been done in accordance with the rules and foundations of syntax and its priorities in preference. Here, there is a point of view that is more distinguished than the others in terms of strength, as it is based on the strongest of the two schools and the strongest of the two paths. Then, there are the opinions of the researcher, which he adds to the end of each issue by strengthening it with evidence and the rules of removing evidence. The review is divided into two chapters: The first chapter deals with the mekkî revealed in Mecca verses in which the difference between the narrations of Hafs and Şube is mentioned, in terms of syntax. The second chapter deals with the medenî verses revealed in Medina in which the difference between the two narrations is mentioned. In this review, the complementary method was followed; then the most important conclusions of the researcher and the most important recommendations to the review were added; sources and references have been identified.

 هذا البحث قائم على دراسة الاختلافات في روايتي شعبة وحفص من الناحية النحوية ففيه تم رصد الاختلافات الإعرابية بين الروايتين في القرآن الكريم كله ومن ثم قورنت الروايتان وتم توجيههما نحويا مع بيان أثر هذا الاختلاف الإعرابي في اختلاف المعنى ووقفت الدراسة عند ما يحتمله اللفظ من أوجه إعرابية مما تم ذكره في بطون أمات كتب اللغة والتفسير وغيرها ثم دراستها والوقوف عندها وإمعان النظر وتسريحه فيها لترجيح كفة وجه على غيره كل ذلك وفق قواعد النحو وأصوله وأولوياته في الترجيح فهناك وجه يفوق غيره من حيث القوة لاعتماده على أقوى المذهبين وأثبت المسلكين ثم كانت للباحث آراؤه التي يذيل بها كل مسألة معضدة بالأدلة وقواعد الاستدلال وقد قسمت الدراسة إلى مبحثين: الأول: تناول الآيات المكية التي ورد فيها الاختلاف بين روايتي حفص وشعبة من الناحية النحوية. والثاني: تطرق إلى الآيات المدنية التي ورد فيها اختلاف بين الروايتين وقد سلكت في هذه الدراسة المنهج التكاملي ثم ذيلت الدراسة بأهم النتائج التي توصل إليها الباحث وأهم التوصيات فثبت للمصادر والمراجع. Bu araştırma, Şube ve Hafsın rivâyetleri arasındaki farklılıkları nahiv sentaks yönünden inceleme üzerine yapılmıştır. Araştırma içerisinde, Kurân-ı Kerîmin tümü üzerinde iki rivâyet arasındaki îrâb kelimelerin son harekelerini inceleyen ilim farklılıkları gözlemlenmiş ve buradan yola çıkılarak iki rivâyet karşılaştırılmıştır. Bu îrâb farklılığının, anlam farklılığı üzerindeki etkisi açıklanarak her iki rivâyet, nahiv sentaks açısından sunulmuştur. İnceleme, temel dil ve tefsir kitapları ile diğer eserlerin içinde zikredilen, lafzın ihtimal dahilinde olan îrâbî açıdan üzerinde durmakta, sonra bunları incelemekte, onlarla meşgul olmakta; bir bakış açısını diğerlerine tercih etmek için konuyu dikkatle gözden geçirmekte ve detaylı bir biçimde ele almaktadır. Tüm bunlar, nahiv sentaks ilminin kaide ve temellerine, tercih hususundaki önceliklerine uygun olarak yapılmıştır. Ortada, iki ekolün en güçlüsüne ve iki gidiş yolunun en sağlamına dayanması itibarı ile kuvvet bakımından diğerlerinden daha seçkin olan bir bakış açısı vardır. Sonra araştırmacının, delillerle ve delil çıkarma kaideleri ile güçlendirerek her meselenin sonuna eklediği görüşleri yer almaktadır. İnceleme, iki bölüme ayrılmıştır: Birinci bölüm: içlerinde, Hafs ve Şubenin rivâyetleri arasındaki farklılığın geçtiği Mekkî Mekkede nâzil olan âyetleri, nahiv sentaks açısından ele almaktadır. İkinci bölüm ise: içlerinde iki rivâyet arasındaki farklılığın geçtiği Medenî Medînede nâzil olan âyetlere değinmektedir. Bu incelemede, tamamlayıcı yöntemi takip etmiş; sonra incelemeye araştırmacının ulaştığı en önemli sonuçları, en önemli tavsiyeleri eklemiş; kaynak ve referansları tespit etmiş bulunmaktayım.

Makale detayları

In Terms of Compilation, Review and Meaning Orientation The Difference in Syntax between Hafs and Şu'be's Narrations from Âsım and Its Meaning and Its Effect on Guidance

Yazarlar:

Hüseyin Yusuf

Yayıncı:

Kirikkale University

Dergi:

Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Vol.13 Issue 1, pp.335-351

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001283529

pISSN:

2146-2879

Nahiv Farklılığı

Anlam Yönelimi

Hafs ve Şu

Derleme

İnceleme

Sayı

Makale detayları

In Terms of Compilation, Review and Meaning Orientation The Difference in Syntax between Hafs and Şu'be's Narrations from Âsım and Its Meaning and Its Effect on Guidance

Yazarlar: Hüseyin Yusuf

Yayıncı: Kirikkale University

Dergi: Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Vol.13 Issue 1, pp.335-351

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 1/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001283529

pISSN: 2146-2879

Nahiv Farklılığı

Anlam Yönelimi

Hafs ve Şu

Derleme

İnceleme

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Hüseyin Yusuf

Yayıncı:

Kirikkale University

Dergi:

Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Vol.13 Issue 1, pp.335-351

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001283529

pISSN:

2146-2879