The Relationship of Pregnancy Planning Status with Perception of Risk and Anxiety During Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Study

Sümeyye Altıparmak; Esra Tolan Aydın; Nezihe Melike Kundi; Kader Atabey; Şeyma Karabulut Bozal; Yeşim Aksoy Derya

Makale detayları

The Relationship of Pregnancy Planning Status with Perception of Risk and Anxiety During Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Study

Yazarlar:

Sümeyye Altıparmak | Esra Tolan Aydın | Nezihe Melike Kundi | Kader Atabey | Şeyma Karabulut Bozal | Yeşim Aksoy Derya

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Klinik Tıp Bilimleri (Diğer)

Dergi:

Genel Tıp Dergisi Vol.34 Issue 6, pp.755-763

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001333458

pISSN:

2602-3741

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Abstract Aims: The objective of this study was to determine the relationship of pregnancy planning status with perception of risk and anxiety during pregnancy. Material and Methods: The sample for the cross-sectional study formed from 268 pregnant women applied to a hospital in eastern Turkey. The data were obtained using the Personal Information Form, the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy LMUP, the Perception of Pregnancy Risk Scale PPRS, and the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Scale-Revision-2 PRAS-R2. In statistical analysis, the percentage distribution, arithmetic mean, standard deviation, Cronbachs alpha, t test in independent groups, and Pearson correlation analysis were utilized. Results: The proportion of women who planned to have a baby was found to be 77.2. The mean total PPRS and PRAS-R2 scores of the women with planned pregnancies were 30.2116.63 and 27.797.72, respectively, and the difference between the groups was determined to be significant p0.000. The mean total PPRS and PRAS-R2 scores of the women who had an unplanned pregnancy were 40.7111.80 and 32.495.59, respectively, and the difference between the groups was determined to be significant p0.000. According to the correlation analysis, there was a weakly significant positive correlation between the mean total scores of women with planned and unplanned pregnancies on the GRAS and GAS-R2, and as the level of perceived risk of pregnancy increased, so did the level of pregnancy-related anxiety. Conclusion: It was found that women with unplanned pregnancies had a higher degree of risk perception and anxiety during pregnancy, and that the level of pregnancy-related anxiety rose as the level of risk perception increased.

 Abstract Aims: The objective of this study was to determine the relationship of pregnancy planning status with perception of risk and anxiety during pregnancy. Material and Methods: The sample for the cross-sectional study formed from 268 pregnant women applied to a hospital in eastern Turkey. The data were obtained using the Personal Information Form, the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy LMUP, the Perception of Pregnancy Risk Scale PPRS, and the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Scale-Revision-2 PRAS-R2. In statistical analysis, the percentage distribution, arithmetic mean, standard deviation, Cronbachs alpha, t test in independent groups, and Pearson correlation analysis were utilized. Results: The proportion of women who planned to have a baby was found to be 77.2. The mean total PPRS and PRAS-R2 scores of the women with planned pregnancies were 30.2116.63 and 27.797.72, respectively, and the difference between the groups was determined to be significant p0.000. The mean total PPRS and PRAS-R2 scores of the women who had an unplanned pregnancy were 40.7111.80 and 32.495.59, respectively, and the difference between the groups was determined to be significant p0.000. According to the correlation analysis, there was a weakly significant positive correlation between the mean total scores of women with planned and unplanned pregnancies on the GRAS and GAS-R2, and as the level of perceived risk of pregnancy increased, so did the level of pregnancy-related anxiety. Conclusion: It was found that women with unplanned pregnancies had a higher degree of risk perception and anxiety during pregnancy, and that the level of pregnancy-related anxiety rose as the level of risk perception increased.

 Abstract Aims: The objective of this study was to determine the relationship of pregnancy planning status with perception of risk and anxiety during pregnancy. Material and Methods: The sample for the cross-sectional study formed from 268 pregnant women applied to a hospital in eastern Turkey. The data were obtained using the Personal Information Form, the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy LMUP, the Perception of Pregnancy Risk Scale PPRS, and the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Scale-Revision-2 PRAS-R2. In statistical analysis, the percentage distribution, arithmetic mean, standard deviation, Cronbachs alpha, t test in independent groups, and Pearson correlation analysis were utilized. Results: The proportion of women who planned to have a baby was found to be 77.2. The mean total PPRS and PRAS-R2 scores of the women with planned pregnancies were 30.2116.63 and 27.797.72, respectively, and the difference between the groups was determined to be significant p0.000. The mean total PPRS and PRAS-R2 scores of the women who had an unplanned pregnancy were 40.7111.80 and 32.495.59, respectively, and the difference between the groups was determined to be significant p0.000. According to the correlation analysis, there was a weakly significant positive correlation between the mean total scores of women with planned and unplanned pregnancies on the GRAS and GAS-R2, and as the level of perceived risk of pregnancy increased, so did the level of pregnancy-related anxiety. Conclusion: It was found that women with unplanned pregnancies had a higher degree of risk perception and anxiety during pregnancy, and that the level of pregnancy-related anxiety rose as the level of risk perception increased.

 Abstract Aims: The objective of this study was to determine the relationship of pregnancy planning status with perception of risk and anxiety during pregnancy. Material and Methods: The sample for the cross-sectional study formed from 268 pregnant women applied to a hospital in eastern Turkey. The data were obtained using the Personal Information Form, the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy LMUP, the Perception of Pregnancy Risk Scale PPRS, and the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Scale-Revision-2 PRAS-R2. In statistical analysis, the percentage distribution, arithmetic mean, standard deviation, Cronbachs alpha, t test in independent groups, and Pearson correlation analysis were utilized. Results: The proportion of women who planned to have a baby was found to be 77.2. The mean total PPRS and PRAS-R2 scores of the women with planned pregnancies were 30.2116.63 and 27.797.72, respectively, and the difference between the groups was determined to be significant p0.000. The mean total PPRS and PRAS-R2 scores of the women who had an unplanned pregnancy were 40.7111.80 and 32.495.59, respectively, and the difference between the groups was determined to be significant p0.000. According to the correlation analysis, there was a weakly significant positive correlation between the mean total scores of women with planned and unplanned pregnancies on the GRAS and GAS-R2, and as the level of perceived risk of pregnancy increased, so did the level of pregnancy-related anxiety. Conclusion: It was found that women with unplanned pregnancies had a higher degree of risk perception and anxiety during pregnancy, and that the level of pregnancy-related anxiety rose as the level of risk perception increased.

Makale detayları

The Relationship of Pregnancy Planning Status with Perception of Risk and Anxiety During Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Study

Yazarlar:

Sümeyye Altıparmak | Esra Tolan Aydın | Nezihe Melike Kundi | Kader Atabey | Şeyma Karabulut Bozal | Yeşim Aksoy Derya

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Klinik Tıp Bilimleri (Diğer)

Dergi:

Genel Tıp Dergisi Vol.34 Issue 6, pp.755-763

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001333458

pISSN:

2602-3741

Anxiety

Pregnancy

Planned pregnancy

Unplanned pregnancy

Perception of risk.

Sayı

Makale detayları

The Relationship of Pregnancy Planning Status with Perception of Risk and Anxiety During Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Study

Yazarlar: Sümeyye Altıparmak | Esra Tolan Aydın | Nezihe Melike Kundi | Kader Atabey | Şeyma Karabulut Bozal | Yeşim Aksoy Derya

Yayıncı: Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar: Klinik Tıp Bilimleri (Diğer)

Dergi: Genel Tıp Dergisi Vol.34 Issue 6, pp.755-763

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 12/2024

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001333458

pISSN: 2602-3741

Anxiety

Pregnancy

Planned pregnancy

Unplanned pregnancy

Perception of risk.

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Sümeyye Altıparmak | Esra Tolan Aydın | Nezihe Melike Kundi | Kader Atabey | Şeyma Karabulut Bozal | Yeşim Aksoy Derya

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Klinik Tıp Bilimleri (Diğer)

Dergi:

Genel Tıp Dergisi Vol.34 Issue 6, pp.755-763

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001333458

pISSN:

2602-3741