Execution as a Power and Duty in the 1982 Constitution after the 2017 Constitutional Amendments

Muhammed Göçgün

Makale detayları

Execution as a Power and Duty in the 1982 Constitution after the 2017 Constitutional Amendments

Yazarlar:

Muhammed Göçgün

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.12 Issue 1, pp.91-129

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001314711

pISSN:

2147-768X

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Fulfilling the executive as a duty in accordance with Article 8 of the Constitution can be realized by assigning certain duties directly to the executive body by the constitutional legislator. On the other hand, executive duty may also mean the execution of a task given to the administration by the legislator or the President within the framework of the principle of legality of the administration, or the making for administrative decisions about the implementation of laws or presidential decrees. The use of the executive authority is the Presidents power to take actions within the scope of his primary regulatory authority, which he has under the Constitution directly, without the will of the legislator. Presidential decrees, which are the most obvious manifestation of the use of the executive as a authority introduced into our legal system following the 2017 constitutional amendments, in which the Presidential government system began to be implemented and the President was determined as the only executive body. The authority to issue a presidential decree, which is regulated in the 17th paragraph of Article 104 of the Constitution, has given the President the power to making primary rules within the scope of the legislative function by taking decisions in matters not regulated by law, albeit within certain limits and to some extent. Thus, the authority nature of the executive branch, which was regulated as authority and duty in the 1982 Constitution but was concreted in a very limited way before the 2017 amendments, was strengthened and clarified by the Presidential decrees after the 2017 amendments.

 Fulfilling the executive as a duty in accordance with Article 8 of the Constitution can be realized by assigning certain duties directly to the executive body by the constitutional legislator. On the other hand, executive duty may also mean the execution of a task given to the administration by the legislator or the President within the framework of the principle of legality of the administration, or the making for administrative decisions about the implementation of laws or presidential decrees. The use of the executive authority is the Presidents power to take actions within the scope of his primary regulatory authority, which he has under the Constitution directly, without the will of the legislator. Presidential decrees, which are the most obvious manifestation of the use of the executive as a authority introduced into our legal system following the 2017 constitutional amendments, in which the Presidential government system began to be implemented and the President was determined as the only executive body. The authority to issue a presidential decree, which is regulated in the 17th paragraph of Article 104 of the Constitution, has given the President the power to making primary rules within the scope of the legislative function by taking decisions in matters not regulated by law, albeit within certain limits and to some extent. Thus, the authority nature of the executive branch, which was regulated as authority and duty in the 1982 Constitution but was concreted in a very limited way before the 2017 amendments, was strengthened and clarified by the Presidential decrees after the 2017 amendments.

 Fulfilling the executive as a duty in accordance with Article 8 of the Constitution can be realized by assigning certain duties directly to the executive body by the constitutional legislator. On the other hand, executive duty may also mean the execution of a task given to the administration by the legislator or the President within the framework of the principle of legality of the administration, or the making for administrative decisions about the implementation of laws or presidential decrees. The use of the executive authority is the Presidents power to take actions within the scope of his primary regulatory authority, which he has under the Constitution directly, without the will of the legislator. Presidential decrees, which are the most obvious manifestation of the use of the executive as a authority introduced into our legal system following the 2017 constitutional amendments, in which the Presidential government system began to be implemented and the President was determined as the only executive body. The authority to issue a presidential decree, which is regulated in the 17th paragraph of Article 104 of the Constitution, has given the President the power to making primary rules within the scope of the legislative function by taking decisions in matters not regulated by law, albeit within certain limits and to some extent. Thus, the authority nature of the executive branch, which was regulated as authority and duty in the 1982 Constitution but was concreted in a very limited way before the 2017 amendments, was strengthened and clarified by the Presidential decrees after the 2017 amendments.

 Yürütmenin Anayasanın 8. maddesi uyarınca bir görev olarak yerine getirilmesi, anayasa koyucunun doğrudan yürütme organına birtakım görevler vermesi şeklinde gerçekleşebilir. Diğer yandan yürütme görevi, idarenin kanuniliği ilkesi çerçevesinde kanun koyucu ya da Cumhurbaşkanı tarafından idareye verilen bir görevin ifa edilmesi ya da kanunların veya Cumhurbaşkanlığı kararnamelerinin uygulanmasına yönelik işlemler tesis edilmesi anlamına da gelebilir. Yürütmenin yetki olarak kullanılması ise Cumhurbaşkanının arada kanun koyucunun bir iradesi olmaksızın doğrudan Anayasadan aldığı aslî düzenleme yetkisi kapsamında işlemler tesis etme gücüne sahip olmasıdır. Yürütmenin yetki olarak kullanılmasının en bariz tezahürü olan Cumhurbaşkanlığı kararnameleri, Cumhurbaşkanlığı hükümet sisteminin uygulanmaya başlandığı 2017 anayasa değişikliklerinin ardından hukukumuza girmiştir. Anayasanın 104. maddesinin 17. fıkrasında düzenlenen Cumhurbaşkanlığı kararnamesi çıkarma yetkisi, Cumhurbaşkanına, konu bakımından belirli sınırlar dahilinde ve belli ölçüde de olsa, kanunla düzenlenmemiş alanlarda aslî nitelikte kurallar koyarak yasama fonksiyonu kapsamında işlemler tesis edebilme gücünü kazandırmıştır. Böylelikle 1982 Anayasasında yetki ve görev olarak düzenlenmesine rağmen 2017 değişikliklerinden önce çok sınırlı şekilde somutlaşan yürütmenin yetki niteliği, 2017 değişiklikleri sonrasında Cumhurbaşkanlığı kararnameleri vasıtasıyla güçlendirilmiş ve belirgin hale getirilmiştir.

Makale detayları

Execution as a Power and Duty in the 1982 Constitution after the 2017 Constitutional Amendments

Yazarlar:

Muhammed Göçgün

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.12 Issue 1, pp.91-129

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001314711

pISSN:

2147-768X

Presidential Decree

Executive

Authority

Duty

Primary RegulationCumhurbaşkanlığı Kararnamesi

Yürütme

Yetki

Görev

Aslî Düzenleme

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Muhammed Göçgün

Yayıncı: Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi: Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.12 Issue 1, pp.91-129

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 7/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001314711

pISSN: 2147-768X

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Muhammed Göçgün

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.12 Issue 1, pp.91-129

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001314711

pISSN:

2147-768X