Assessment of Irrigation Schemes with Comparative Indicators in the Southeastern Anatolia Project

Hasan DEĞİRMENCİ*

Makale detayları

Assessment of Irrigation Schemes with Comparative Indicators in the Southeastern Anatolia Project

Yazarlar:

Hasan DEĞİRMENCİ*

Yayıncı:

TUBITAK

Dergi:

Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 2003 Vol.27 Issue 5, pp.293-303

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2003

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2000809294

Sıklık:

İki Aylık

eISSN:

1303-6173

pISSN:

1300-011X

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 

In this study, 6 comparative indicators for the assessment of irrigation system performance were applied to 12 irrigation schemes, which were components of the Southeastern Anatolian Project, for the period 1997-2001. The output per unit cropped area,  output per unit command, output per unit irrigation supply, output per unit water consumed, relative water supply and irrigation ratio were calculated as 1223-9436  ha-1, 308-5771  ha-1, 0.12-2.16  m-3, 0.45-2.92  m-3, 1.00-5.90, and 7-100%, respectively. ANOVA test results indicated that among the schemes the differences in the output per unit cropped area, output per unit irrigation supply, output per unit water consumed and relative water supply were not statistically significant but that the differences in output per unit command and irrigation ratio were statistically significant. For efficient and rational irrigation management, an information system for monitoring and evaluation which encompasses all stakeholders, should be set up and irrigation scheduling should be designed.

 

In this study, 6 comparative indicators for the assessment of irrigation system performance were applied to 12 irrigation schemes, which were components of the Southeastern Anatolian Project, for the period 1997-2001. The output per unit cropped area,  output per unit command, output per unit irrigation supply, output per unit water consumed, relative water supply and irrigation ratio were calculated as 1223-9436  ha-1, 308-5771  ha-1, 0.12-2.16  m-3, 0.45-2.92  m-3, 1.00-5.90, and 7-100%, respectively. ANOVA test results indicated that among the schemes the differences in the output per unit cropped area, output per unit irrigation supply, output per unit water consumed and relative water supply were not statistically significant but that the differences in output per unit command and irrigation ratio were statistically significant. For efficient and rational irrigation management, an information system for monitoring and evaluation which encompasses all stakeholders, should be set up and irrigation scheduling should be designed.

Makale detayları

Assessment of Irrigation Schemes with Comparative Indicators in the Southeastern Anatolia Project

Yazarlar:

Hasan DEĞİRMENCİ*

Yayıncı:

TUBITAK

Dergi:

Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 2003 Vol.27 Issue 5, pp.293-303

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2003

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2000809294

Sıklık:

İki Aylık

eISSN:

1303-6173

pISSN:

1300-011X

Irrigation scheme

comparative indicators

standardized gross value of production

relative water supply

irrigation ratio

Sayı

Makale detayları

Assessment of Irrigation Schemes with Comparative Indicators in the Southeastern Anatolia Project

Yazarlar: Hasan DEĞİRMENCİ*

Yayıncı: TUBITAK

Dergi: Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 2003 Vol.27 Issue 5, pp.293-303

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 4/2003

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2000809294

Sıklık: İki Aylık

eISSN: 1303-6173

pISSN: 1300-011X

Irrigation scheme

comparative indicators

standardized gross value of production

relative water supply

irrigation ratio

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Hasan DEĞİRMENCİ*

Yayıncı:

TUBITAK

Dergi:

Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 2003 Vol.27 Issue 5, pp.293-303

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2003

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2000809294

Sıklık:

İki Aylık

eISSN:

1303-6173

pISSN:

1300-011X