Evaluation of Bond Strength of Endocronal Restorations Prepared with Different Ceramics: In Vitro Study

Müberra Güney; Zeynep Yeşil

Makale detayları

Evaluation of Bond Strength of Endocronal Restorations Prepared with Different Ceramics: In Vitro Study

Yazarlar:

Müberra Güney | Zeynep Yeşil

Yayıncı:

Bingol University

Ana Başlıklar:

Protez ve Ortez

Dergi:

Bingöl Üniversitesi Sağlık Dergisi Vol.5 Issue 2, pp.436-449

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001317212

pISSN:

2717-7653

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Aim: In this study, the bond strength of endocrown restorations prepared with different ceramics was evaluated. Material and Method: The study was conducted on 21 extracted permanent lower molar teeth. Teeth whose root canal treatments were completed were prepared for endocrown restoration. Endocron restorations made of three different ceramics Cerasmart GC, Tokyo, Japan, Upcera UP-CAD, Guandong, China, CeltraDuo Dentsply Sirona, Bensheim, Germany with Computer Aided DesignComputer Aided Manufacturing CADCAM technique prepared. After the endocrown restorations were cemented with resin cement Maxcem Elite Kerr, 63 sections were taken locally apical, middle and coronal and they were randomly divided into 3 groups n7. The bond strength of the samples was examined on a universal testing device using the push-out test. The data obtained; It was evaluated at the p0.05 significance level by two-way analysis of variance and Tukeys multiple comparison test using the Jamovi 2.2.5 program The Jamovi Project, Sydney, Australia. Results: It was determined that the material used and the sectioned area were statistically significant p0.001. While no significant difference was detected between lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramic Upcera and resin nanoceramic Cerasmart materials in each evaluated region p0.05, both materials showed significantly higher binding p0.05 than Celtraduo. It was determined that it showed durability. Conclusion: It was determined that the content of the materials was effective on the bond strength.

 Aim: In this study, the bond strength of endocrown restorations prepared with different ceramics was evaluated. Material and Method: The study was conducted on 21 extracted permanent lower molar teeth. Teeth whose root canal treatments were completed were prepared for endocrown restoration. Endocron restorations made of three different ceramics Cerasmart GC, Tokyo, Japan, Upcera UP-CAD, Guandong, China, CeltraDuo Dentsply Sirona, Bensheim, Germany with Computer Aided DesignComputer Aided Manufacturing CADCAM technique prepared. After the endocrown restorations were cemented with resin cement Maxcem Elite Kerr, 63 sections were taken locally apical, middle and coronal and they were randomly divided into 3 groups n7. The bond strength of the samples was examined on a universal testing device using the push-out test. The data obtained; It was evaluated at the p0.05 significance level by two-way analysis of variance and Tukeys multiple comparison test using the Jamovi 2.2.5 program The Jamovi Project, Sydney, Australia. Results: It was determined that the material used and the sectioned area were statistically significant p0.001. While no significant difference was detected between lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramic Upcera and resin nanoceramic Cerasmart materials in each evaluated region p0.05, both materials showed significantly higher binding p0.05 than Celtraduo. It was determined that it showed durability. Conclusion: It was determined that the content of the materials was effective on the bond strength.

 Aim: In this study, the bond strength of endocrown restorations prepared with different ceramics was evaluated. Material and Method: The study was conducted on 21 extracted permanent lower molar teeth. Teeth whose root canal treatments were completed were prepared for endocrown restoration. Endocron restorations made of three different ceramics Cerasmart GC, Tokyo, Japan, Upcera UP-CAD, Guandong, China, CeltraDuo Dentsply Sirona, Bensheim, Germany with Computer Aided DesignComputer Aided Manufacturing CADCAM technique prepared. After the endocrown restorations were cemented with resin cement Maxcem Elite Kerr, 63 sections were taken locally apical, middle and coronal and they were randomly divided into 3 groups n7. The bond strength of the samples was examined on a universal testing device using the push-out test. The data obtained; It was evaluated at the p0.05 significance level by two-way analysis of variance and Tukeys multiple comparison test using the Jamovi 2.2.5 program The Jamovi Project, Sydney, Australia. Results: It was determined that the material used and the sectioned area were statistically significant p0.001. While no significant difference was detected between lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramic Upcera and resin nanoceramic Cerasmart materials in each evaluated region p0.05, both materials showed significantly higher binding p0.05 than Celtraduo. It was determined that it showed durability. Conclusion: It was determined that the content of the materials was effective on the bond strength.

 Amaç: Bu çalışmada, farklı seramikler ile hazırlanan endokron restorasyonların bağlanma dayanımları değerlendirildi. Materyal ve Metod: Çalışma 21 adet çekilmiş daimi alt molar diş üzerinde yürütüldü. Kök kanal tedavileri tamamlanan dişlerin endokron restorasyon için preparasyonları yapıldı. Bilgisayar Destekli Tasarım Bilgisayar Destekli Üretim CADCAM tekniği ile üç farklı seramikten Cerasmart GC, Tokyo, Japan, Upcera UP-CAD, Guandong, China, CeltraDuo Dentsply Sirona, Bensheim, Germany endokron restorasyonlar hazırlandı. Endokron restorasyonlar, rezin siman Maxcem Elite ile simante edildikten sonra her birinden bölgesel apikal, orta ve koronal olarak alınan 63 kesit rastgele olarak üç gruba n  7 ayrıldı. Örneklerin bağlanma dayanımları push-out testi kullanılarak universal test cihazında değerlendirildi. Elde edilen veriler; Jamovi 2.2.5 programı The Jamovi Project, Sydney, Avustralya kullanılarak iki yönlü varyans analizi ve Tukey çoklu karşılaştırma testi ile p0.05 anlamlılık düzeyinde incelendi. Bulgular: Kullanılan materyalin ve kesit alınan bölgenin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı p0,001 olduğu belirlendi. Değerlendirilen her bir bölgede lityum disilikat ile güçlendirilmiş cam seramik Upcera ile rezin nano seramik Cerasmart materyalleri arasında anlamlı fark saptanmaz iken p0,05, her iki materyalin Celtraduodan anlamlı şekilde daha fazla p0.05 bağlanma dayanımı gösterdiği belirlendi. Sonuç: Bağlanma dayanımı üzerine materyallerin içeriğinin etkili olduğu belirlendi.

Makale detayları

Evaluation of Bond Strength of Endocronal Restorations Prepared with Different Ceramics: In Vitro Study

Yazarlar:

Müberra Güney | Zeynep Yeşil

Yayıncı:

Bingol University

Ana Başlıklar:

Protez ve Ortez

Dergi:

Bingöl Üniversitesi Sağlık Dergisi Vol.5 Issue 2, pp.436-449

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001317212

pISSN:

2717-7653

Different Ceramics

Endocrown

Bond StrengthBağlanma dayanımı

Endokron

Farklı seramikler

Sayı

Makale detayları

Evaluation of Bond Strength of Endocronal Restorations Prepared with Different Ceramics: In Vitro Study

Yazarlar: Müberra Güney | Zeynep Yeşil

Yayıncı: Bingol University

Ana Başlıklar: Protez ve Ortez

Dergi: Bingöl Üniversitesi Sağlık Dergisi Vol.5 Issue 2, pp.436-449

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 8/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001317212

pISSN: 2717-7653

Different Ceramics

Endocrown

Bond StrengthBağlanma dayanımı

Endokron

Farklı seramikler

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Müberra Güney | Zeynep Yeşil

Yayıncı:

Bingol University

Ana Başlıklar:

Protez ve Ortez

Dergi:

Bingöl Üniversitesi Sağlık Dergisi Vol.5 Issue 2, pp.436-449

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001317212

pISSN:

2717-7653