CONNECTION OF THE NEMO TENETUR PRINCIPLE WITH PERSONAL REASON FOR LIFTING CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY AND RIGHT OF REFRAINING FROM TESTIMONY: ANNULMENT OF THE LAW REGULATING THE CRIME OF NOT REPORTING THE CRIME

Esra Bulut

Makale detayları

CONNECTION OF THE NEMO TENETUR PRINCIPLE WITH PERSONAL REASON FOR LIFTING CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY AND RIGHT OF REFRAINING FROM TESTIMONY: ANNULMENT OF THE LAW REGULATING THE CRIME OF NOT REPORTING THE CRIME

Yazarlar:

Esra Bulut

Yayıncı:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.28 Issue 1, pp.471-507

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001311587

pISSN:

2651-4141

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The purpose of personal impunity reasons for crimes against the courthouse, refusal to testify because of his relationship with the suspect or the accused, and the regulations not to give an oath to the witness in connection with the crime that is the subject of investigation or prosecution are the same. The aim is to protect human dignity by implementing the principle of nemo tenetur, which is expressed in the form of not being forced to make accusatory statements against oneself and hisher relatives and evidence enclosures on this road. The Constitutional Court annulled the crime of not reporting the crime Turkish Penal Code Article 278 on the grounds that it violated the principle of nemo tenetur. Thereupon, the legislator added a personal impunity reason for this crime. In this regulation, the legislator referred to the people who have the right to refusal to testify and established a connection point to this right and personal impunity reasons, which have the same purpose of regulation in the Turkish Penal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code.

 The purpose of personal impunity reasons for crimes against the courthouse, refusal to testify because of his relationship with the suspect or the accused, and the regulations not to give an oath to the witness in connection with the crime that is the subject of investigation or prosecution are the same. The aim is to protect human dignity by implementing the principle of nemo tenetur, which is expressed in the form of not being forced to make accusatory statements against oneself and hisher relatives and evidence enclosures on this road. The Constitutional Court annulled the crime of not reporting the crime Turkish Penal Code Article 278 on the grounds that it violated the principle of nemo tenetur. Thereupon, the legislator added a personal impunity reason for this crime. In this regulation, the legislator referred to the people who have the right to refusal to testify and established a connection point to this right and personal impunity reasons, which have the same purpose of regulation in the Turkish Penal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code.

 The purpose of personal impunity reasons for crimes against the courthouse, refusal to testify because of his relationship with the suspect or the accused, and the regulations not to give an oath to the witness in connection with the crime that is the subject of investigation or prosecution are the same. The aim is to protect human dignity by implementing the principle of nemo tenetur, which is expressed in the form of not being forced to make accusatory statements against oneself and hisher relatives and evidence enclosures on this road. The Constitutional Court annulled the crime of not reporting the crime Turkish Penal Code Article 278 on the grounds that it violated the principle of nemo tenetur. Thereupon, the legislator added a personal impunity reason for this crime. In this regulation, the legislator referred to the people who have the right to refusal to testify and established a connection point to this right and personal impunity reasons, which have the same purpose of regulation in the Turkish Penal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code.

 Adliyeye karşı suçlara yönelik şahsi cezasızlık sebepleri, tanığın şüpheli veya sanık ile akrabalığı nedeniyle tanıklıktan çekinme yetkisi ve soruşturma veya kovuşturma konusu suçla irtibatlı tanığa yemin verilmemesi düzenlemelerinin amaçları aynıdır. Amaç, kişinin kendisini ve yakınlarını suçlayıcı beyanda bulunmaya ve bu yolda delil göstermeye zorlanamaması şeklinde ifade edilen nemo tenetur ilkesinin hayata geçirilerek insan onurunun korunmasıdır. Anayasa Mahkemesi, nemo tenetur ilkesine aykırı olduğu gerekçesiyle suçu bildirmeme suçunu düzenleyen kanun hükmünü iptal etmiştir. Bunun üzerine kanun koyucu suçu bildirmeme suçuna yönelik şahsi cezasızlık sebebi düzenlemesi eklemiştir. Bu düzenlemede şahsi cezasızlık sebebinden yararlanabilecekler, tanıklıktan çekinebilecek kişilere atıf yapılarak belirlendiğinden Türk Ceza Kanununda ve Ceza Muhakemesi Kanununda düzenlenme amacı aynı olan bu iki kuruma bir bağlantı noktası sağlanmıştır.

Makale detayları

CONNECTION OF THE NEMO TENETUR PRINCIPLE WITH PERSONAL REASON FOR LIFTING CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY AND RIGHT OF REFRAINING FROM TESTIMONY: ANNULMENT OF THE LAW REGULATING THE CRIME OF NOT REPORTING THE CRIME

Yazarlar:

Esra Bulut

Yayıncı:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.28 Issue 1, pp.471-507

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001311587

pISSN:

2651-4141

Principle of nemo tenetur

personal impunity reason

power to refuse to testify

crime of not reporting the crime

witnesses not obligation to oathnemo tenetur ilkesi

şahsi cezasızlık sebebi

tanıklıktan çekinme yetkisi

suçu bildirmeme suçu

yemin verilmeyen tanıklar

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Esra Bulut

Yayıncı: Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk

Dergi: Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.28 Issue 1, pp.471-507

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001311587

pISSN: 2651-4141

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Esra Bulut

Yayıncı:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.28 Issue 1, pp.471-507

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001311587

pISSN:

2651-4141