LIBERAL NEUTRALITY, DIFFERENCES AND LAW

Fatma İrem Çağlar Gürgey

Makale detayları

LIBERAL NEUTRALITY, DIFFERENCES AND LAW

Yazarlar:

Fatma İrem Çağlar Gürgey

Yayıncı:

Tekirdag Namik Kemal University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Tekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.5 Issue 1, pp.125-149

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001324782

pISSN:

2717-9621

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 While liberalism seemed to have triumphed over the socialist system in the West during the 1990s, it faced a serious legitimacy problem within itself. Indeed, while liberalization and globalization have led to an increase in different life forms within a society, it has become clear that the question of how citizens with different conceptions of good life can live together in a fair society has not been adequately answered. Contemporary liberal theory has embarked on a search for new answers based on the principle of neutrality. Liberal states that adopt the principle of neutrality and their legal systems concretizing their discussions of diversity and inclusion through their practices. In this study present the approach of the state and liberal legal norms and practices, which are based on the principles of liberal neutrality, towards differences. However, before moving on to this, the basic concepts of difference and neutrality in contemporary liberal theory will be addressed.

 While liberalism seemed to have triumphed over the socialist system in the West during the 1990s, it faced a serious legitimacy problem within itself. Indeed, while liberalization and globalization have led to an increase in different life forms within a society, it has become clear that the question of how citizens with different conceptions of good life can live together in a fair society has not been adequately answered. Contemporary liberal theory has embarked on a search for new answers based on the principle of neutrality. Liberal states that adopt the principle of neutrality and their legal systems concretizing their discussions of diversity and inclusion through their practices. In this study present the approach of the state and liberal legal norms and practices, which are based on the principles of liberal neutrality, towards differences. However, before moving on to this, the basic concepts of difference and neutrality in contemporary liberal theory will be addressed.

 While liberalism seemed to have triumphed over the socialist system in the West during the 1990s, it faced a serious legitimacy problem within itself. Indeed, while liberalization and globalization have led to an increase in different life forms within a society, it has become clear that the question of how citizens with different conceptions of good life can live together in a fair society has not been adequately answered. Contemporary liberal theory has embarked on a search for new answers based on the principle of neutrality. Liberal states that adopt the principle of neutrality and their legal systems concretizing their discussions of diversity and inclusion through their practices. In this study present the approach of the state and liberal legal norms and practices, which are based on the principles of liberal neutrality, towards differences. However, before moving on to this, the basic concepts of difference and neutrality in contemporary liberal theory will be addressed.

 1990lı yıllarda liberalizm sosyalist sistemler karşısında başarı kazanmış gibi gözükse de aslında kendi içinde önemli bir meşruiyet kriziyle karşı karşıya kalmıştır. Zira liberalleşme ve küreselleşme bir toplumda yaşam tarzı çeşitliliğinin artmasına neden olurken, bu çeşitlilik içinde farklı iyi yaşam anlayışlarına sahip vatandaşların birlikte adil bir toplumda nasıl yaşayacakları sorusunun yeterince cevaplanmadığı ortaya çıkmıştır. Çağdaş liberal teori nötrlük ilkesi temelinde yeni cevaplar arayışı içerisine girmiştir. Nötrlük ilkesini benimseyen liberal devletler ve onların hukuk sistemleri uygulamalarıyla çeşitlilik ve kapsayıcılığı tartışmalarını somutlaştırmaktadırlar. Bu çalışmada liberal nötrlük ilkesini temel alan devlet ve liberal hukuk normları ve uygulamalarının farklılıklara ilişkin yaklaşımı ortaya konulacaktır. Ancak buna geçmeden önce temel kavramlar olan farklılık, çağdaş liberal teorideki nötrlük kavrayışları ele alınacaktır.

Makale detayları

LIBERAL NEUTRALITY, DIFFERENCES AND LAW

Yazarlar:

Fatma İrem Çağlar Gürgey

Yayıncı:

Tekirdag Namik Kemal University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Tekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.5 Issue 1, pp.125-149

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001324782

pISSN:

2717-9621

Neutrality

differences

liberalism

harm principle

neutrality of justification

consequential neutralityNötrlük

farklılıklar

liberalizm

zarar ilkesi

haklı gösterme nötrlüğü

sonuç nötrlüğü

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Fatma İrem Çağlar Gürgey

Yayıncı: Tekirdag Namik Kemal University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi: Tekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.5 Issue 1, pp.125-149

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 8/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001324782

pISSN: 2717-9621

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Fatma İrem Çağlar Gürgey

Yayıncı:

Tekirdag Namik Kemal University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Tekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.5 Issue 1, pp.125-149

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001324782

pISSN:

2717-9621