EVALUATION OF THE LEGAL INTEREST CONDITION FOR TERMINATION OF THE TENDER, ESPECIALLY IN TERMS OF THE CONCEPT OF DAMAGES

Cansu Korkmaz

Makale detayları

EVALUATION OF THE LEGAL INTEREST CONDITION FOR TERMINATION OF THE TENDER, ESPECIALLY IN TERMS OF THE CONCEPT OF DAMAGES

Yazarlar:

Cansu Korkmaz

Yayıncı:

Akdeniz University

Ana Başlıklar:

Özel Hukuk ve Medeni Yükümlülükler (Diğer)

Dergi:

Akdeniz Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.14 Issue 1, pp.401-441

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001322060

pISSN:

2147-3854

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The person who claims that the tender is not in accordance with the law may request the termination of the tender from the enforcement court. However, in addition to being one of the persons listed in the legislation, the person requesting the termination of the tender must also have a legal interest within the scope of the reason for the termination of the tender. In this regard, the fact that the requester has a legal interest in the termination of the tender is a necessary condition for the merits of the request for termination of the tender to be examined. If this condition is not met, the request for termination of the tender will be procedurally rejected due to lack of legal interest. For this reason, how the legal interest regarding the termination of the tender is evaluated, and its narrow or broad interpretation is significant as it will result in whether the relevant request will be examined on its merits or not. In practice, to find the legal interest of terminating the tender, the existence of damage is sought, the condition of legal interest is identified with the element of damage, and these concepts can even be used interchangeably. In this regard, it is seen that in practice, a conclusion is made by comparing the estimated value of the relevant asset element with the tender price to determine the existence of longterm damage. It is understood that except for some incidents, the courts reject termination requests for tenders made at the same or higher value than the estimated value due to lack of legal interest, and this practice has become established until the recent change in jurisprudence. Evaluating the legal interest with the damage element requires changing the criterion used to determine the existence of damage, examining the legal interest condition regarding the termination of the tender, and especially addressing the concept of damage. In this context, the study deals with the qualifications that the interest must have regarding the request for termination of the tender, the equivalent of the legal interest condition in the institution of termination of the tender, the appropriateness of the criterion used in judicial decisions regarding legal interest, and the results of the approaches in practice regarding the evaluation of this condition.

 The person who claims that the tender is not in accordance with the law may request the termination of the tender from the enforcement court. However, in addition to being one of the persons listed in the legislation, the person requesting the termination of the tender must also have a legal interest within the scope of the reason for the termination of the tender. In this regard, the fact that the requester has a legal interest in the termination of the tender is a necessary condition for the merits of the request for termination of the tender to be examined. If this condition is not met, the request for termination of the tender will be procedurally rejected due to lack of legal interest. For this reason, how the legal interest regarding the termination of the tender is evaluated, and its narrow or broad interpretation is significant as it will result in whether the relevant request will be examined on its merits or not. In practice, to find the legal interest of terminating the tender, the existence of damage is sought, the condition of legal interest is identified with the element of damage, and these concepts can even be used interchangeably. In this regard, it is seen that in practice, a conclusion is made by comparing the estimated value of the relevant asset element with the tender price to determine the existence of longterm damage. It is understood that except for some incidents, the courts reject termination requests for tenders made at the same or higher value than the estimated value due to lack of legal interest, and this practice has become established until the recent change in jurisprudence. Evaluating the legal interest with the damage element requires changing the criterion used to determine the existence of damage, examining the legal interest condition regarding the termination of the tender, and especially addressing the concept of damage. In this context, the study deals with the qualifications that the interest must have regarding the request for termination of the tender, the equivalent of the legal interest condition in the institution of termination of the tender, the appropriateness of the criterion used in judicial decisions regarding legal interest, and the results of the approaches in practice regarding the evaluation of this condition.

 The person who claims that the tender is not in accordance with the law may request the termination of the tender from the enforcement court. However, in addition to being one of the persons listed in the legislation, the person requesting the termination of the tender must also have a legal interest within the scope of the reason for the termination of the tender. In this regard, the fact that the requester has a legal interest in the termination of the tender is a necessary condition for the merits of the request for termination of the tender to be examined. If this condition is not met, the request for termination of the tender will be procedurally rejected due to lack of legal interest. For this reason, how the legal interest regarding the termination of the tender is evaluated, and its narrow or broad interpretation is significant as it will result in whether the relevant request will be examined on its merits or not. In practice, to find the legal interest of terminating the tender, the existence of damage is sought, the condition of legal interest is identified with the element of damage, and these concepts can even be used interchangeably. In this regard, it is seen that in practice, a conclusion is made by comparing the estimated value of the relevant asset element with the tender price to determine the existence of longterm damage. It is understood that except for some incidents, the courts reject termination requests for tenders made at the same or higher value than the estimated value due to lack of legal interest, and this practice has become established until the recent change in jurisprudence. Evaluating the legal interest with the damage element requires changing the criterion used to determine the existence of damage, examining the legal interest condition regarding the termination of the tender, and especially addressing the concept of damage. In this context, the study deals with the qualifications that the interest must have regarding the request for termination of the tender, the equivalent of the legal interest condition in the institution of termination of the tender, the appropriateness of the criterion used in judicial decisions regarding legal interest, and the results of the approaches in practice regarding the evaluation of this condition.

 İhalenin hukuka uygun olmadığı iddiasında olan kişi, icra mahkemesinden ihalenin feshini talep edebilir. Ancak ihalenin feshi yoluna başvuran kişinin mevzuatta sayılan kişilerden olmasının yanında, ileri sürdüğü ihalenin feshi sebebi kapsamında hukukî yararının da bulunması gerekir. Zira talep sahibinin hukukî yararının olması, ihalenin feshi talebinin esastan incelenmesi için varlığı aranılan bir şarttır. Bu şart yerine getirilmediği takdirde, hukukî yarar yokluğundan ihalenin feshi talebinin usûlden reddine karar verilir. Bu nedenle, ihalenin feshedilmesine ilişkin hukukî yararın değerlendirilmesi, dar veya geniş yorumlanması, ilgili talebin esastan incelenip incelenmemesi sonucunu doğurması yönüyle önemlidir. Uygulamada ihalenin feshi taleplerinde hukukî yararın bulunması için zararın varlığı aranmakta, hukukî yarar şartı ile zarar unsuru özdeşleştirilmekte ve bu kavramlar birbiri yerine dâhi kullanılabilmektedir. Bu doğrultuda, uygulamada zararın varlığının belirlenmesi için ilgili malvarlığı unsurunun muhammen değeri ile ihale bedeli karşılaştırılmak suretiyle bir sonuca varılmaktadır. Yargı kararlarında, bazı istisnalar hariç olmak üzere, muhammen değer ile aynı ya da bu değerden daha yüksek bedelle yapılan ihaleler bakımından fesih talebinin hukukî yarar yokluğundan reddedildiği ve bu uygulamanın yakın zamandaki içtihat değişikliğine kadar yerleşik hâle geldiği anlaşılmaktadır. Hukukî yararın zarar unsuru ile birlikte değerlendirilmesi, zararın varlığının belirlenmesi için kullanılan ölçütün değiştirilmesi, ihalenin feshine ilişkin hukukî yarar şartının incelenmesini ve özellikle zarar kavramının ele alınmasını gerektirir. Bu bağlamda çalışmada, ihalenin feshedilmesindeki yararın nitelikleri, hukukî yarar şartının ihalenin feshi kurumundaki karşılığı, hukukî yarara ilişkin yargı kararlarında kullanılan ölçütün yerindeliği ve bu şartın değerlendirilmesine ilişkin uygulamadaki yaklaşımların neticeleri ele alınmıştır.

Makale detayları

EVALUATION OF THE LEGAL INTEREST CONDITION FOR TERMINATION OF THE TENDER, ESPECIALLY IN TERMS OF THE CONCEPT OF DAMAGES

Yazarlar:

Cansu Korkmaz

Yayıncı:

Akdeniz University

Ana Başlıklar:

Özel Hukuk ve Medeni Yükümlülükler (Diğer)

Dergi:

Akdeniz Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.14 Issue 1, pp.401-441

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001322060

pISSN:

2147-3854

Auction

Tender

Termination of Tender

Liquidation

Legal InterestAçık Artırma

İhale

İhalenin Feshi

Paraya Çevirme

Hukukî Yarar.

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Cansu Korkmaz

Yayıncı: Akdeniz University

Ana Başlıklar: Özel Hukuk ve Medeni Yükümlülükler (Diğer)

Dergi: Akdeniz Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.14 Issue 1, pp.401-441

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 1/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001322060

pISSN: 2147-3854

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Cansu Korkmaz

Yayıncı:

Akdeniz University

Ana Başlıklar:

Özel Hukuk ve Medeni Yükümlülükler (Diğer)

Dergi:

Akdeniz Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.14 Issue 1, pp.401-441

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001322060

pISSN:

2147-3854