The Effect of Glocal Systemic Polarity on Regional Stability

İbrahim Halil Yaşar; Selim Dursun

Makale detayları

The Effect of Glocal Systemic Polarity on Regional Stability

Yazarlar:

İbrahim Halil Yaşar | Selim Dursun

Yayıncı:

İstanbul Gelisim University

Ana Başlıklar:

Bölgesel Çalışmalar

Dergi:

İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 2, pp.474-489

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

10/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001300638

pISSN:

2148-4287

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 This study is about the effect of glocal systemic polarity on regional stability. Studies on polarity and stability often focus on the relationship between global systemic polarity and stability or regional systemic polarity and stability. In these studies, it is assumed that the global systemic polarity structure penetrates all regions of the world at the same rate or the regional systemic polarity operates independently from the global systemic polarity. However, these assumptions lead to some gaps in the explanation of the relationship between polarity and stability. This study attempts to fill this gap by introducing the concept of glocal systemic polarity. This concept argues that in the relationship between polarity and stability, global systemic polarity has different degrees of influence on regions, and these different degrees affect regional stability. Therefore, it argues that in all global systems, regions on which a pole-state or pole-states develop hegemonic relations by themselves are stable, or regions on which a pole-state cannot develop hegemonic relations alone are unstable. This claim will be tested by looking at the regional distribution of the conflicts intensity that occurred between 1947 and 2020 in the world.

 This study is about the effect of glocal systemic polarity on regional stability. Studies on polarity and stability often focus on the relationship between global systemic polarity and stability or regional systemic polarity and stability. In these studies, it is assumed that the global systemic polarity structure penetrates all regions of the world at the same rate or the regional systemic polarity operates independently from the global systemic polarity. However, these assumptions lead to some gaps in the explanation of the relationship between polarity and stability. This study attempts to fill this gap by introducing the concept of glocal systemic polarity. This concept argues that in the relationship between polarity and stability, global systemic polarity has different degrees of influence on regions, and these different degrees affect regional stability. Therefore, it argues that in all global systems, regions on which a pole-state or pole-states develop hegemonic relations by themselves are stable, or regions on which a pole-state cannot develop hegemonic relations alone are unstable. This claim will be tested by looking at the regional distribution of the conflicts intensity that occurred between 1947 and 2020 in the world.

 This study is about the effect of glocal systemic polarity on regional stability. Studies on polarity and stability often focus on the relationship between global systemic polarity and stability or regional systemic polarity and stability. In these studies, it is assumed that the global systemic polarity structure penetrates all regions of the world at the same rate or the regional systemic polarity operates independently from the global systemic polarity. However, these assumptions lead to some gaps in the explanation of the relationship between polarity and stability. This study attempts to fill this gap by introducing the concept of glocal systemic polarity. This concept argues that in the relationship between polarity and stability, global systemic polarity has different degrees of influence on regions, and these different degrees affect regional stability. Therefore, it argues that in all global systems, regions on which a pole-state or pole-states develop hegemonic relations by themselves are stable, or regions on which a pole-state cannot develop hegemonic relations alone are unstable. This claim will be tested by looking at the regional distribution of the conflicts intensity that occurred between 1947 and 2020 in the world.

 Bu çalışma glokal sistemik kutupluluğun bölgesel istikrara etkisi hakkındadır. Kutupluluk ve istikrar üzerindeki çalışmalar genellikle global sistemik kutupluluk ve istikrar veya bölgesel sistemik kutupluluk ve istikrar arasındaki ilişkiye odaklanmaktadır. Bu çalışmalarda, global sistemik kutupluluk yapısının dünyadaki tüm bölgelere aynı oranda nüfuz ettiği ya da bölgesel sistemik kutupluluğun global sistemik kutupluluktan bağımsız işlediği varsayılmaktadır. Ancak, bu varsayımlar kutupluluk ve istikrar arasındaki ilişkinin açıklanmasında bazı boşluklara yol açmaktadır. Bu çalışma glokal sistemik kutupluluk kavramını ortaya atarak bu boşluğu doldurmaya çalışmaktadır. Bu kavram, kutupluluk ve istikrar arasındaki ilişkide, global sistemik kutupluluğun bölgelere etkisinin farklı derecelerde olduğunu ve bu farklılığın da bölgesel istikrarı etkilediğini savunur. Dolayısıyla, bütün global sistemlerde, kutup-başı devlet ya da devletlerin tek başlarına üzerinde hegemonik ilişki geliştirdiği bölgelerin istikrarlı veya bir kutup-başı devletin tek başına üzerinde hegemonik ilişki geliştiremediği bölgelerin istikrarsız olduğunu iddia eder. Bu iddia, dünyada 1947-2020 tarihleri arasında meydana gelen çatışma sayılarının yoğunluğunun bölgesel dağılımlarına bakılarak test edilecektir.

Makale detayları

The Effect of Glocal Systemic Polarity on Regional Stability

Yazarlar:

İbrahim Halil Yaşar | Selim Dursun

Yayıncı:

İstanbul Gelisim University

Ana Başlıklar:

Bölgesel Çalışmalar

Dergi:

İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 2, pp.474-489

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

10/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001300638

pISSN:

2148-4287

System

Glocal System

Polarity

Stability

ConflictSistem

Glokal Sistem

Kutupluluk

İstikrar

Çatışma

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: İbrahim Halil Yaşar | Selim Dursun

Yayıncı: İstanbul Gelisim University

Ana Başlıklar: Bölgesel Çalışmalar

Dergi: İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 2, pp.474-489

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 10/2023

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001300638

pISSN: 2148-4287

Sayı

Yazarlar:

İbrahim Halil Yaşar | Selim Dursun

Yayıncı:

İstanbul Gelisim University

Ana Başlıklar:

Bölgesel Çalışmalar

Dergi:

İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 2, pp.474-489

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

10/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001300638

pISSN:

2148-4287