The Relationship of Mudraj Recitation with Tafsīr and Its Effect on Meaning

Mustafa Hamurlu

Makale detayları

The Relationship of Mudraj Recitation with Tafsīr and Its Effect on Meaning

Yazarlar:

Mustafa Hamurlu

Yayıncı:

Gaziantep University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kuran-ı Kerim Okuma ve Kıraat | Tefsir

Dergi:

İlahiyat Akademi Issue 20, pp.243-262

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001335793

pISSN:

2149-3979

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 One of the prominent features of the science of recitation is that it contributes to making choices regarding verses that can be interpreted in different ways. In this sense, the first source to be consulted is the mutawatir recitation narrations. The narrations that are specifically conveyed in the science of recitation are classified as mutawatir, ahad and shaz. Narrations that do not meet the conditions for conveyance of mutawatir narrations are called shaz. In terms of expressing a wider group of narrations, it is important to clarify all aspects of shaz recitations and to focus on how much they affect the interpretation. Mudraj recitations, which are considered as a sub-section of shaz recitations within classical recitation sources, it is stated that they are not type of recitation but rather contain additions in the form of interpretation. Although the mudraj narrations are not part of the Qurān, these narrations consist of the Prophets explanations of some concepts in the Qurān. In this case, the mudraj narrations are the expressions that the companions made by recording these explanations of the Prophet and by making notes next to the places where the verses are written so that the verse can be understood more clearly. This study focuses on the nature of the mudraj recitations and examines the scope within which they are evaluated and their contribution to tafsir. The study will clarify how mudraj recitations are determined and how they are distinguished from other narrations. In this context, one of the issues we examine is the issue of inheritance. In this regard, it is important that the mudraj recitations express a consensus decision such as the issue of inheritance Although the mudraj recitations have reached us through fixed narrations, they are not considered Quranic. Some scholars have claimed that prayers can be performed with the Mudraj recitations not found in the Qurān of Hz. Osman, provided that the chain of narrators is authentic. It is narrated that some of the companions ṣaḥāba and the successors tābiʿūn read such recitations during prayers and no one criticized them on this issue. Therefore, it is important to explain the evidence that will support these narrations on the subject. The overwhelming majority of scholars have adopted the view that prayers performed with such narrations are not authentic ṣaḥīḥ. Some other scholars have tried to find a common ground. They have suggested that the mutawatir recitation should be read in the Surah Fatiha, which is obligatory wājib to be read during prayer, and that mudraj recitation can be performed in places other than the obligatory parts. In this study, in addition to the definition of mudraj recitation, the issue of whether they should be considered as a type of recitation or as a narration explaining the meaning has been examined. In addition, this study sought answers to the questions of whether Mudraj recitations express an agreed ruling, whether they are seen as a reason for preference in a controversial issue, whether they record the absolute meaning, and whether prayers are performed with Mudraj recitations.

 One of the prominent features of the science of recitation is that it contributes to making choices regarding verses that can be interpreted in different ways. In this sense, the first source to be consulted is the mutawatir recitation narrations. The narrations that are specifically conveyed in the science of recitation are classified as mutawatir, ahad and shaz. Narrations that do not meet the conditions for conveyance of mutawatir narrations are called shaz. In terms of expressing a wider group of narrations, it is important to clarify all aspects of shaz recitations and to focus on how much they affect the interpretation. Mudraj recitations, which are considered as a sub-section of shaz recitations within classical recitation sources, it is stated that they are not type of recitation but rather contain additions in the form of interpretation. Although the mudraj narrations are not part of the Qurān, these narrations consist of the Prophets explanations of some concepts in the Qurān. In this case, the mudraj narrations are the expressions that the companions made by recording these explanations of the Prophet and by making notes next to the places where the verses are written so that the verse can be understood more clearly. This study focuses on the nature of the mudraj recitations and examines the scope within which they are evaluated and their contribution to tafsir. The study will clarify how mudraj recitations are determined and how they are distinguished from other narrations. In this context, one of the issues we examine is the issue of inheritance. In this regard, it is important that the mudraj recitations express a consensus decision such as the issue of inheritance Although the mudraj recitations have reached us through fixed narrations, they are not considered Quranic. Some scholars have claimed that prayers can be performed with the Mudraj recitations not found in the Qurān of Hz. Osman, provided that the chain of narrators is authentic. It is narrated that some of the companions ṣaḥāba and the successors tābiʿūn read such recitations during prayers and no one criticized them on this issue. Therefore, it is important to explain the evidence that will support these narrations on the subject. The overwhelming majority of scholars have adopted the view that prayers performed with such narrations are not authentic ṣaḥīḥ. Some other scholars have tried to find a common ground. They have suggested that the mutawatir recitation should be read in the Surah Fatiha, which is obligatory wājib to be read during prayer, and that mudraj recitation can be performed in places other than the obligatory parts. In this study, in addition to the definition of mudraj recitation, the issue of whether they should be considered as a type of recitation or as a narration explaining the meaning has been examined. In addition, this study sought answers to the questions of whether Mudraj recitations express an agreed ruling, whether they are seen as a reason for preference in a controversial issue, whether they record the absolute meaning, and whether prayers are performed with Mudraj recitations.

 One of the prominent features of the science of recitation is that it contributes to making choices regarding verses that can be interpreted in different ways. In this sense, the first source to be consulted is the mutawatir recitation narrations. The narrations that are specifically conveyed in the science of recitation are classified as mutawatir, ahad and shaz. Narrations that do not meet the conditions for conveyance of mutawatir narrations are called shaz. In terms of expressing a wider group of narrations, it is important to clarify all aspects of shaz recitations and to focus on how much they affect the interpretation. Mudraj recitations, which are considered as a sub-section of shaz recitations within classical recitation sources, it is stated that they are not type of recitation but rather contain additions in the form of interpretation. Although the mudraj narrations are not part of the Qurān, these narrations consist of the Prophets explanations of some concepts in the Qurān. In this case, the mudraj narrations are the expressions that the companions made by recording these explanations of the Prophet and by making notes next to the places where the verses are written so that the verse can be understood more clearly. This study focuses on the nature of the mudraj recitations and examines the scope within which they are evaluated and their contribution to tafsir. The study will clarify how mudraj recitations are determined and how they are distinguished from other narrations. In this context, one of the issues we examine is the issue of inheritance. In this regard, it is important that the mudraj recitations express a consensus decision such as the issue of inheritance Although the mudraj recitations have reached us through fixed narrations, they are not considered Quranic. Some scholars have claimed that prayers can be performed with the Mudraj recitations not found in the Qurān of Hz. Osman, provided that the chain of narrators is authentic. It is narrated that some of the companions ṣaḥāba and the successors tābiʿūn read such recitations during prayers and no one criticized them on this issue. Therefore, it is important to explain the evidence that will support these narrations on the subject. The overwhelming majority of scholars have adopted the view that prayers performed with such narrations are not authentic ṣaḥīḥ. Some other scholars have tried to find a common ground. They have suggested that the mutawatir recitation should be read in the Surah Fatiha, which is obligatory wājib to be read during prayer, and that mudraj recitation can be performed in places other than the obligatory parts. In this study, in addition to the definition of mudraj recitation, the issue of whether they should be considered as a type of recitation or as a narration explaining the meaning has been examined. In addition, this study sought answers to the questions of whether Mudraj recitations express an agreed ruling, whether they are seen as a reason for preference in a controversial issue, whether they record the absolute meaning, and whether prayers are performed with Mudraj recitations.

 Kıraat ilminin öne çıkan özelliklerinden birisi de farklı şekilde yorumlanabilen âyetlerle ilgili tercihte bulunmaya katkı sunmasıdır. Bu anlamda ilk başvurulması gereken kaynak, mütevâtir kıraat rivayetleridir. Kıraat ilmi özelinde nakledilen rivayetler mütevâtir, âhad ve şâz olarak tasnif edilmektedir. Mütevâtir rivayetlerin nakil şartlarını taşımayan rivayetler şâz olarak adlandırılmıştır. Daha geniş rivayet grubunu ifade etmesi açısından şâz kıraatlerin bütün yönleriyle aydınlatılması ve tefsire ne denli etki ettiği üzerinde durulması önem arz etmektedir. Müdrec rivayetler, klasik kıraat kaynaklarında Şâz kıraatlerin bir alt bölümü olarak yer almışsa da müdrecin bir tür kıraat olmaktan ziyade tefsir kabîlinden yapılmış ziyadeleri içerdiği ifade edilmektedir. Müdrec rivayetler Kuranın bir bölümü olmamakla beraber, Hz. Peygamberden nakledilen ve Kuranın bazı kavramları hakkında yapılan açıklamalardan ibarettir. Bu durumda müdrec rivayetler sahâbîlerin, Hz. Peygamber tarafından yapılan bu açıklamaları kayıt altına aldıkları ve âyetin daha net anlaşılması için âyetlerin yazılı bulunduğu yerlerin yanına not ettikleri kelime ve cümlelerden meydana getirdikleri ifadelerdir. Bu çalışma müdrec kıraatlerin mahiyetini merkezine alıp, hangi kapsam altında değerlendirildiğini ve tefsire katkısını konu edinmektedir. Çalışmada müdrec kıraatlerin nasıl belirlendiği ve diğer rivayetlerden nasıl ayırt edildiği konusuna açıklık getirilecektir. Bu bağlamda tetkik ettiğimiz konulardan biri miras meselesidir. Müdrec kıraatlerin, miras konusu gibi icma edilen bir hükmü beyan etmesi bu yönüyle önem arz etmektedir. Kuranda zikredilen cinayet ve zıhar kefareti hususunda, müdrec rivayetlerin önemli bir noktaya açıklık getirdiği görülmektedir. Yine Kuranda yer alan yemin çeşitlerinden hangisinin kefaret gerektirdiği ve bu kefaretin nasıl uygulanacağı konusunda, Mütevâtir kıraat ile müdrec kıraatlerin farklı sonuçlar içerdiği görülmektedir. Müdrec kıraatler sabit nakillerle bize ulaşmışsa da Kuran mesabesinde değillerdir. Bazı âlimler, senedi sahih olması kaydıyla Hz. Osman mushafında bulunmayan müdrec kıraatlerle namaz kılınabileceğini öne sürmüşlerdir. Sahâbe ve tâbiûndan bazı kimselerin bu tarz kıraatleri namazda okudukları ve hiç kimsenin bu konuda onları tenkit etmediği rivayet edilmektedir. Dolayısıyla konuyla ilgili aktarılan bu rivayetleri destekleyecek delillerin izah edilmesi önem arz etmektedir. Ulemânın kahir ekseriyeti bu tarz rivayetlerle kılınan namazın sahih olmadığı görüşünü benimsemişlerdir. Diğer bazı âlimlerde orta yolu bulmaya çalışmıştır. Namazda okunması vacip olan Fatiha sûresinde mütevâtir kıraatin okunması gerektiğini, vacibin dışında kalan yerlerde ise müdrec kıraatlerin icra edebileceğini öne sürmüşlerdir. Bu çalışmamızda müdrec kıraatlerin tanımının yanı sıra bir kıraat türü olarak mı yoksa anlamı açıklayan bir rivayet olarak mı değerlendirileceği konusu irdelenmiştir. Ayrıca üzerinde icma edilen bir hükmü beyan etmesi, ihtilaflı bir meselede tercih sebebi olarak görülmesi, mutlak manayı kayıt altına alması ve müdrec kıraatlerle namaz kılınıp kılınamaması konularına cevap aranmıştır.

Makale detayları

The Relationship of Mudraj Recitation with Tafsīr and Its Effect on Meaning

Yazarlar:

Mustafa Hamurlu

Yayıncı:

Gaziantep University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kuran-ı Kerim Okuma ve Kıraat | Tefsir

Dergi:

İlahiyat Akademi Issue 20, pp.243-262

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001335793

pISSN:

2149-3979

Recitation

Tafsīr

Qur’ān

Ahad

MudrajKıraat

Tefsîr

Kur'an

Âhâd

Müdrec

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Mustafa Hamurlu

Yayıncı: Gaziantep University

Ana Başlıklar: Kuran-ı Kerim Okuma ve Kıraat | Tefsir

Dergi: İlahiyat Akademi Issue 20, pp.243-262

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 12/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001335793

pISSN: 2149-3979

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Mustafa Hamurlu

Yayıncı:

Gaziantep University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kuran-ı Kerim Okuma ve Kıraat | Tefsir

Dergi:

İlahiyat Akademi Issue 20, pp.243-262

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001335793

pISSN:

2149-3979