The Effects of Different Types of Surface Conditioning Methods on Enamel Demineralization: An In-vitro Rebonded Bracket Study

Kemal Can Acır; Orhan Çiçek; Nurhat Özkalaycı

Makale detayları

The Effects of Different Types of Surface Conditioning Methods on Enamel Demineralization: An In-vitro Rebonded Bracket Study

Yazarlar:

Kemal Can Acır | Orhan Çiçek | Nurhat Özkalaycı

Yayıncı:

Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Dergi:

Batı Karadeniz Tıp Dergisi Vol.7 Issue 2, pp.180-187

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001297872

pISSN:

2822-4302

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the conventional etching and primer CEP method and the self-etching primer SEP method on demineralization while rebonding the brackets. Material and Methods: Sixty extracted maxillary first premolar teeth were divided into 4 groups, each containing 15 teeth. The teeth in Groups 1 and 2 were bonded using CEP, and those in Groups 3 and 4 were bonded using SEP. After the first bonding, adjacent surfaces of the brackets were measured using DIAGNOdent pen, and demineralization values were recorded T0. The teeth were kept in a demineralization solution for 15 days in a 37C incubator. Then, all brackets were debonded. The teeth in Groups 1 and 3 were rebonded using CEP, and those in Groups 2 and 4 were rebonded using SEP. In this way, via the enamel surface conditioning prior the first bonding and rebonding, the groups were constructed as; Group 1 CEP-CEP, Group 2 CEP-SEP, Group 3 SEP-CEP and Group 4 SEP-SEP. The teeth were kept in the same solutions by same way T1. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to determine whether or not the data were normally distributed, the Wilcoxon test was used for comparisons within groups, and the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for comparisons between groups. p0.05 was considered significant. Results: At T1, the demineralization values in Group 1 obtained from all surfaces were found to be significantly higher than those in Groups 3 and 4 p0.05. The amount of increase in demineralization between T0 and T1 was observed to be the greatest on the gingival surfaces and the smallest on occlusal surfaces in all groups. Regardless of the enamel surface measured, the mean increase in values on all surfaces was the highest in Group 1 and the lowest in Group 4. Conclusion: Considering the effects of orthodontic bracket rebonding on the enamel surface, the selfetching primer method produces less enamel demineralization than the conventional etching and primer method.

 Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the conventional etching and primer CEP method and the self-etching primer SEP method on demineralization while rebonding the brackets. Material and Methods: Sixty extracted maxillary first premolar teeth were divided into 4 groups, each containing 15 teeth. The teeth in Groups 1 and 2 were bonded using CEP, and those in Groups 3 and 4 were bonded using SEP. After the first bonding, adjacent surfaces of the brackets were measured using DIAGNOdent pen, and demineralization values were recorded T0. The teeth were kept in a demineralization solution for 15 days in a 37C incubator. Then, all brackets were debonded. The teeth in Groups 1 and 3 were rebonded using CEP, and those in Groups 2 and 4 were rebonded using SEP. In this way, via the enamel surface conditioning prior the first bonding and rebonding, the groups were constructed as; Group 1 CEP-CEP, Group 2 CEP-SEP, Group 3 SEP-CEP and Group 4 SEP-SEP. The teeth were kept in the same solutions by same way T1. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to determine whether or not the data were normally distributed, the Wilcoxon test was used for comparisons within groups, and the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for comparisons between groups. p0.05 was considered significant. Results: At T1, the demineralization values in Group 1 obtained from all surfaces were found to be significantly higher than those in Groups 3 and 4 p0.05. The amount of increase in demineralization between T0 and T1 was observed to be the greatest on the gingival surfaces and the smallest on occlusal surfaces in all groups. Regardless of the enamel surface measured, the mean increase in values on all surfaces was the highest in Group 1 and the lowest in Group 4. Conclusion: Considering the effects of orthodontic bracket rebonding on the enamel surface, the selfetching primer method produces less enamel demineralization than the conventional etching and primer method.

 Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the conventional etching and primer CEP method and the self-etching primer SEP method on demineralization while rebonding the brackets. Material and Methods: Sixty extracted maxillary first premolar teeth were divided into 4 groups, each containing 15 teeth. The teeth in Groups 1 and 2 were bonded using CEP, and those in Groups 3 and 4 were bonded using SEP. After the first bonding, adjacent surfaces of the brackets were measured using DIAGNOdent pen, and demineralization values were recorded T0. The teeth were kept in a demineralization solution for 15 days in a 37C incubator. Then, all brackets were debonded. The teeth in Groups 1 and 3 were rebonded using CEP, and those in Groups 2 and 4 were rebonded using SEP. In this way, via the enamel surface conditioning prior the first bonding and rebonding, the groups were constructed as; Group 1 CEP-CEP, Group 2 CEP-SEP, Group 3 SEP-CEP and Group 4 SEP-SEP. The teeth were kept in the same solutions by same way T1. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to determine whether or not the data were normally distributed, the Wilcoxon test was used for comparisons within groups, and the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for comparisons between groups. p0.05 was considered significant. Results: At T1, the demineralization values in Group 1 obtained from all surfaces were found to be significantly higher than those in Groups 3 and 4 p0.05. The amount of increase in demineralization between T0 and T1 was observed to be the greatest on the gingival surfaces and the smallest on occlusal surfaces in all groups. Regardless of the enamel surface measured, the mean increase in values on all surfaces was the highest in Group 1 and the lowest in Group 4. Conclusion: Considering the effects of orthodontic bracket rebonding on the enamel surface, the selfetching primer method produces less enamel demineralization than the conventional etching and primer method.

 Amaç: Bu çalışma, yeniden yapıştırılan braketlerde geleneksel asitle pürüzlendirme yöntemi ile selfetching primer yönteminin demineralizasyon üzerindeki etkilerini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: 60 adet çekilmiş maksiller birinci premolar diş, her biri 15er diş içeren 4 gruba ayrıldı. Braketler, Grup 1 ve 2de asit ile pürüzlendirme ile, Grup 3 ve 4te self-etching ile yapıştırıldı. İlk yapıştırma işleminden sonra braketlerin komşu yüzeyleri DIAGNOdent pen kullanılarak ölçüldü ve demineralizasyon değerleri kaydedildi T0. Dişler 37C inkübatörde 15 gün demineralizasyon solüsyonunda bekletildi. Daha sonra tüm braketler koparıldı. Braketler, Grup 1 ve 3teki dişlerde asitle pürüzlendirme ile, Grup 2 ve 4teki dişlerde ise self-etching primer ile tekrar yapıştırıldı. Böylece, ilk yapıştırma ve tekrar yapıştırma öncesi mine yüzey hazırlığı ile gruplar şu şekilde oluşturuldu; Grup 1 asitle pürüzlendirmeasitle pürüzlendirme, Grup 2 asitle pürüzlendirmeselfetching, Grup 3 self-etchingasitle pürüzlendirme ve Grup 4 self-etchingself-etching. Dişler aynı solüsyonlarda aynı şekilde bekletildi T1. Verilerin homojen dağılıp dağılmadığını belirlemek için Kolmogorov-Smirnov testi, grup içi karşılaştırmalarda Wilcoxon testi ve gruplar arası karşılaştırmalarda Mann-Whitney U ve Kruskal-Wallis testleri kullanıldı. p0.05 anlamlı kabul edildi. Bulgular: T1 döneminde Grup 1de tüm yüzeylerden elde edilen demineralizasyon değerleri Grup 3 ve 4e göre anlamlı şekilde yüksek bulundu p0.05. Tüm gruplarda T0 ve T1 arasındaki demineralizasyon artış miktarının en fazla gingival yüzeylerde, en az oklüzal yüzeylerde olduğu görüldü. Ölçülen mine yüzeyinden bağımsız olarak, tüm yüzeylerdeki değerlerin artış ortalaması Grup 1de en yüksek, Grup 4te en düşüktü. Sonuç: Ortodontik braketlerin yeniden yapıştırılmasının mine yüzeyine etkileri göz önüne alındığında, self-etching primer yöntemi geleneksel asitle pürüzlendirme yöntemine göre daha az mine demineralizasyonu oluşturur.

Makale detayları

The Effects of Different Types of Surface Conditioning Methods on Enamel Demineralization: An In-vitro Rebonded Bracket Study

Yazarlar:

Kemal Can Acır | Orhan Çiçek | Nurhat Özkalaycı

Yayıncı:

Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Dergi:

Batı Karadeniz Tıp Dergisi Vol.7 Issue 2, pp.180-187

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001297872

pISSN:

2822-4302

Demineralization

rebonded bracket

diagnodentDemineralizasyon

rebonded braket

diagnodent

Sayı

Makale detayları

The Effects of Different Types of Surface Conditioning Methods on Enamel Demineralization: An In-vitro Rebonded Bracket Study

Yazarlar: Kemal Can Acır | Orhan Çiçek | Nurhat Özkalaycı

Yayıncı: Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University

Ana Başlıklar: Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Dergi: Batı Karadeniz Tıp Dergisi Vol.7 Issue 2, pp.180-187

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 8/2023

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001297872

pISSN: 2822-4302

Demineralization

rebonded bracket

diagnodentDemineralizasyon

rebonded braket

diagnodent

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Kemal Can Acır | Orhan Çiçek | Nurhat Özkalaycı

Yayıncı:

Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Dergi:

Batı Karadeniz Tıp Dergisi Vol.7 Issue 2, pp.180-187

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001297872

pISSN:

2822-4302