Co-existence of Democracy and Capitalism: A Reflection of Reciprocity or Ideology?

Tareq Hossain Khan

Makale detayları

Co-existence of Democracy and Capitalism: A Reflection of Reciprocity or Ideology?

Yazarlar:

Tareq Hossain Khan

Yayıncı:

Istanbul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Political Science (Other)

Dergi:

Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences Vol.32 Issue 2, pp.311-355

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

11/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001304261

pISSN:

2618-6330

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 There are two types of premises discussing the relationship between democracy and capitalism. First, capitalism and democracy are interrelated since both ideologies protect the liberal concept of private property and the freedom of individuals. However, another bloc believes that these two ideologies are contradictory. Capitalism generates economic inequalities within society that create political disparity. Through a critical survey of some foundational texts and contemporary literature on liberal democracy and capitalism, this article examines their relationship and explains why and how capitalism and democracy support each other. It argues that capitalism and democracy fit structurally and mutually make a politico-economic order in which capitalism ensures its autonomies against the state, and democracy commands public policies in which economic structure does not ban the freedom of political choice. The article concludes that capitalism and democracy were reciprocally causal historically and serve as survival-shield of each other although they are not ideologically tied; democracy is the best institutional safeguard of market freedom and profit maximization, while capitalism creates the practical ground of political competition. Both are functionally well-suited as they ensure high centralization of power and capital in a few hands. This relationship is far more interest-oriented and power-centric than ideological.

 There are two types of premises discussing the relationship between democracy and capitalism. First, capitalism and democracy are interrelated since both ideologies protect the liberal concept of private property and the freedom of individuals. However, another bloc believes that these two ideologies are contradictory. Capitalism generates economic inequalities within society that create political disparity. Through a critical survey of some foundational texts and contemporary literature on liberal democracy and capitalism, this article examines their relationship and explains why and how capitalism and democracy support each other. It argues that capitalism and democracy fit structurally and mutually make a politico-economic order in which capitalism ensures its autonomies against the state, and democracy commands public policies in which economic structure does not ban the freedom of political choice. The article concludes that capitalism and democracy were reciprocally causal historically and serve as survival-shield of each other although they are not ideologically tied; democracy is the best institutional safeguard of market freedom and profit maximization, while capitalism creates the practical ground of political competition. Both are functionally well-suited as they ensure high centralization of power and capital in a few hands. This relationship is far more interest-oriented and power-centric than ideological.

 There are two types of premises discussing the relationship between democracy and capitalism. First, capitalism and democracy are interrelated since both ideologies protect the liberal concept of private property and the freedom of individuals. However, another bloc believes that these two ideologies are contradictory. Capitalism generates economic inequalities within society that create political disparity. Through a critical survey of some foundational texts and contemporary literature on liberal democracy and capitalism, this article examines their relationship and explains why and how capitalism and democracy support each other. It argues that capitalism and democracy fit structurally and mutually make a politico-economic order in which capitalism ensures its autonomies against the state, and democracy commands public policies in which economic structure does not ban the freedom of political choice. The article concludes that capitalism and democracy were reciprocally causal historically and serve as survival-shield of each other although they are not ideologically tied; democracy is the best institutional safeguard of market freedom and profit maximization, while capitalism creates the practical ground of political competition. Both are functionally well-suited as they ensure high centralization of power and capital in a few hands. This relationship is far more interest-oriented and power-centric than ideological.

 There are two types of premises discussing the relationship between democracy and capitalism. First, capitalism and democracy are interrelated since both ideologies protect the liberal concept of private property and the freedom of individuals. However, another bloc believes that these two ideologies are contradictory. Capitalism generates economic inequalities within society that create political disparity. Through a critical survey of some foundational texts and contemporary literature on liberal democracy and capitalism, this article examines their relationship and explains why and how capitalism and democracy support each other. It argues that capitalism and democracy fit structurally and mutually make a politico-economic order in which capitalism ensures its autonomies against the state, and democracy commands public policies in which economic structure does not ban the freedom of political choice. The article concludes that capitalism and democracy were reciprocally causal historically and serve as survival-shield of each other although they are not ideologically tied; democracy is the best institutional safeguard of market freedom and profit maximization, while capitalism creates the practical ground of political competition. Both are functionally well-suited as they ensure high centralization of power and capital in a few hands. This relationship is far more interest-oriented and power-centric than ideological.

Makale detayları

Co-existence of Democracy and Capitalism: A Reflection of Reciprocity or Ideology?

Yazarlar:

Tareq Hossain Khan

Yayıncı:

Istanbul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Political Science (Other)

Dergi:

Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences Vol.32 Issue 2, pp.311-355

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

11/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001304261

pISSN:

2618-6330

Democracy

capitalism

socialism

freedom

power-reciprocity

Sayı

Makale detayları

Co-existence of Democracy and Capitalism: A Reflection of Reciprocity or Ideology?

Yazarlar: Tareq Hossain Khan

Yayıncı: Istanbul University

Ana Başlıklar: Political Science (Other)

Dergi: Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences Vol.32 Issue 2, pp.311-355

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 11/2023

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001304261

pISSN: 2618-6330

Democracy

capitalism

socialism

freedom

power-reciprocity

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Tareq Hossain Khan

Yayıncı:

Istanbul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Political Science (Other)

Dergi:

Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences Vol.32 Issue 2, pp.311-355

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

11/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001304261

pISSN:

2618-6330