THE OFFENSE OF EXTENDING THE PROPERTY WITH THE INTENT TO HARM THE CREDITOR (Article 331 of the EBL)

Murat Aydın

Makale detayları

THE OFFENSE OF EXTENDING THE PROPERTY WITH THE INTENT TO HARM THE CREDITOR (Article 331 of the EBL)

Yazarlar:

Murat Aydın

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ceza Hukuku

Dergi:

Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.33 Issue 3, pp.1959-1988

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

9/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001356847

pISSN:

1306-8075

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Failure to pay ones debt does not constitute a ground for punishment. However, it is possible to punish behaviors aimed at preventing the creditor from collecting its receivables. The offense regulated in Article 331 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law is of this nature. Two different types of offenses are regulated in this article. In this study, these types of offenses are discussed with all their elements. With the regulation of these offenses, first of all, it is tried to ensure that the creditor can make a collection. Thus, it is actually intended to protect the assets of the creditor. Secondly, it is aimed for the enforcement offices to carry out their activities properly. In this respect, public trust is tried to be protected. Both types of offenses are specific offenses. In addition, the crimes regulated in the article are of a dependent movement nature. Therefore, they cannot be committed in any other way. These crimes can be committed intentionally. The Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code adopts a different system for the prosecution of these offenses than the approach adopted in the Criminal Procedure Code. In this context, the offenses in Article 331 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law are discussed in detail from the perspective of criminal law.

 Failure to pay ones debt does not constitute a ground for punishment. However, it is possible to punish behaviors aimed at preventing the creditor from collecting its receivables. The offense regulated in Article 331 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law is of this nature. Two different types of offenses are regulated in this article. In this study, these types of offenses are discussed with all their elements. With the regulation of these offenses, first of all, it is tried to ensure that the creditor can make a collection. Thus, it is actually intended to protect the assets of the creditor. Secondly, it is aimed for the enforcement offices to carry out their activities properly. In this respect, public trust is tried to be protected. Both types of offenses are specific offenses. In addition, the crimes regulated in the article are of a dependent movement nature. Therefore, they cannot be committed in any other way. These crimes can be committed intentionally. The Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code adopts a different system for the prosecution of these offenses than the approach adopted in the Criminal Procedure Code. In this context, the offenses in Article 331 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law are discussed in detail from the perspective of criminal law.

 Failure to pay ones debt does not constitute a ground for punishment. However, it is possible to punish behaviors aimed at preventing the creditor from collecting its receivables. The offense regulated in Article 331 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law is of this nature. Two different types of offenses are regulated in this article. In this study, these types of offenses are discussed with all their elements. With the regulation of these offenses, first of all, it is tried to ensure that the creditor can make a collection. Thus, it is actually intended to protect the assets of the creditor. Secondly, it is aimed for the enforcement offices to carry out their activities properly. In this respect, public trust is tried to be protected. Both types of offenses are specific offenses. In addition, the crimes regulated in the article are of a dependent movement nature. Therefore, they cannot be committed in any other way. These crimes can be committed intentionally. The Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code adopts a different system for the prosecution of these offenses than the approach adopted in the Criminal Procedure Code. In this context, the offenses in Article 331 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law are discussed in detail from the perspective of criminal law.

 Kişinin borcunu ödememesi cezalandırma için bir gerekçe oluşturmaz. Ancak alacaklının alacağını tahsil etmesini engellemeye yönelik davranışların cezalandırılması mümkündür. İcra ve İflas Kanununun 331. Maddesinde düzenlenen suç da bu niteliktedir. Maddede iki ayrı suç tipi düzenlenmiştir. Çalışmada bu suç tipleri tüm unsurlarıyla ele alınmıştır. Bu suçların düzenlenmesi ile öncelikle alacaklının tahsilat yapabilmesi sağlanmaya çalışılmaktadır. Böylece aslında alacaklının malvarlığı korunmak istenmektedir. İkinci olarak da icra dairelerinin faaliyetlerini düzgün şekilde yapması amaçlanmaktadır. Bu açıdan da kamu güveni korunmaya çalışılmaktadır. Her iki suç tipi de özgü suç niteliği taşımaktadır. Ayrıca maddede düzenlenen suçlar bağlı hareketli nitelik taşımaktadır. Bu nedenle başka türlü işlenmeleri mümkün değildir. Bu suçlar kasten işlenebilen suçlardır. Bu suçların yargılanmasına yönelik İcra ve İflas Kanunu, Ceza Muhakemesi Kanununda benimsenen yaklaşımdan farklı bir sistem benimsemiştir. Bu kapsamda İcra ve İflas Kanununun 331. Maddesinde yer alan suçlar ceza hukuku perspektifinden tüm detayları ile ele alınmıştır.

Makale detayları

THE OFFENSE OF EXTENDING THE PROPERTY WITH THE INTENT TO HARM THE CREDITOR (Article 331 of the EBL)

Yazarlar:

Murat Aydın

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ceza Hukuku

Dergi:

Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.33 Issue 3, pp.1959-1988

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

9/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001356847

pISSN:

1306-8075

Reduce assets

spesific offence

proceeding

right of defence

conditions of punishability.Mevcudu eksiltme

özgü suç

yargılama usulü

savunma hakkı

cezalandırılabilirlik şartları.

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Murat Aydın

Yayıncı: Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar: Ceza Hukuku

Dergi: Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.33 Issue 3, pp.1959-1988

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 9/2025

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001356847

pISSN: 1306-8075

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Murat Aydın

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ceza Hukuku

Dergi:

Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.33 Issue 3, pp.1959-1988

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

9/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001356847

pISSN:

1306-8075