A META-EVALUATION RESEARCH ON MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION COURSE

Muhammed Akıncı; Erdoğan Köse

Makale detayları

A META-EVALUATION RESEARCH ON MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION COURSE

Yazarlar:

Muhammed Akıncı | Erdoğan Köse

Yayıncı:

Trakya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar

Dergi:

Trakya Eğitim Dergisi Vol.13 Issue 2, pp.817-829

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001290195

pISSN:

2630-6301

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 In this study, it was aimed to make a meta-evaluation of the study titled Evaluation of Measurement and Evaluation in Education Curriculum. For this purpose, it was revealed to what extent the study meets the Program Evaluation Standards determined by the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation JCSEE. Methodologically, meta-evaluation procedures were adopted in the research, and the Evaluation Accountability Standards determined by JCSEE were considered in the transactions carried out in this context. The Program Evaluation Standards Checklist developed by the researchers was used to control whether the meta-evaluated research met the required standards. For this purpose, controls were made by an internal and an external evaluator to reveal whether the study has the qualities of accurate planning, valid and reliable data collection, performing the necessary analyzes, and reporting which should be in an effective program evaluation research. According to the data obtained from internal and external evaluators, the meta-evaluated study largely 88.33 meets the Program Evaluation Standards. In addition, according to both evaluators, Utility Standards were met by 88.9, Feasibility Standards by 75, and Accuracy Standards by 100, while Propriety Standards are met at a rate of 87.5 according to the external evaluator and 75 according to the internal evaluator. Moreover, the experts are of the opinion that sufficient information was not provided in the research, especially about the concepts of cultural values, interests, contexts, and conflicts of interest. Based on the research findings, suggestions were made to conduct program evaluation and meta-evaluation studies more effectively.

 In this study, it was aimed to make a meta-evaluation of the study titled Evaluation of Measurement and Evaluation in Education Curriculum. For this purpose, it was revealed to what extent the study meets the Program Evaluation Standards determined by the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation JCSEE. Methodologically, meta-evaluation procedures were adopted in the research, and the Evaluation Accountability Standards determined by JCSEE were considered in the transactions carried out in this context. The Program Evaluation Standards Checklist developed by the researchers was used to control whether the meta-evaluated research met the required standards. For this purpose, controls were made by an internal and an external evaluator to reveal whether the study has the qualities of accurate planning, valid and reliable data collection, performing the necessary analyzes, and reporting which should be in an effective program evaluation research. According to the data obtained from internal and external evaluators, the meta-evaluated study largely 88.33 meets the Program Evaluation Standards. In addition, according to both evaluators, Utility Standards were met by 88.9, Feasibility Standards by 75, and Accuracy Standards by 100, while Propriety Standards are met at a rate of 87.5 according to the external evaluator and 75 according to the internal evaluator. Moreover, the experts are of the opinion that sufficient information was not provided in the research, especially about the concepts of cultural values, interests, contexts, and conflicts of interest. Based on the research findings, suggestions were made to conduct program evaluation and meta-evaluation studies more effectively.

 In this study, it was aimed to make a meta-evaluation of the study titled Evaluation of Measurement and Evaluation in Education Curriculum. For this purpose, it was revealed to what extent the study meets the Program Evaluation Standards determined by the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation JCSEE. Methodologically, meta-evaluation procedures were adopted in the research, and the Evaluation Accountability Standards determined by JCSEE were considered in the transactions carried out in this context. The Program Evaluation Standards Checklist developed by the researchers was used to control whether the meta-evaluated research met the required standards. For this purpose, controls were made by an internal and an external evaluator to reveal whether the study has the qualities of accurate planning, valid and reliable data collection, performing the necessary analyzes, and reporting which should be in an effective program evaluation research. According to the data obtained from internal and external evaluators, the meta-evaluated study largely 88.33 meets the Program Evaluation Standards. In addition, according to both evaluators, Utility Standards were met by 88.9, Feasibility Standards by 75, and Accuracy Standards by 100, while Propriety Standards are met at a rate of 87.5 according to the external evaluator and 75 according to the internal evaluator. Moreover, the experts are of the opinion that sufficient information was not provided in the research, especially about the concepts of cultural values, interests, contexts, and conflicts of interest. Based on the research findings, suggestions were made to conduct program evaluation and meta-evaluation studies more effectively.

 Bu çalışmada, Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dersi Programının Değerlendirilmesi başlıklı çalışmanın meta-değerlendirmesinin yapılması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda çalışmanın Eğitimde Değerlendirme Standartları Ortak Komitesi JCSEE tarafından belirlenen Program Değerlendirme Standartlarını ne ölçüde karşıladığı ortaya koyulmuştur. Araştırmada yöntemsel olarak meta-değerlendirme prosedürleri benimsenmiş, bu bağlamda gerçekleştirilen işlemlerde JCSEE tarafından belirlenen Değerlendirmede Hesap Verebilirlik standartları dikkate alınmıştır. Meta-değerlendirmesi yapılan araştırmanın gerekli standartları taşıyıp taşımadığının kontrolünde ise araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen Program Değerlendirme Standartları Kontrol Listesi kullanılmıştır. Bu amaçla bir iç, bir de dış değerlendirici tarafından çalışmanın etkin bir program değerlendirme araştırmasında olması gereken doğru planlama, geçerli ve güvenilir veri toplanma, gerekli analizleri yapma ve raporlaştırma niteliklerini taşıyıp taşımadığına yönelik kontroller yapılmıştır. İç ve dış değerlendiricilerden elde edilen verilere göre bu araştırma JCSEE tarafından belirlenen Program Değerlendirme Standartlarını büyük oranda 88,33 karşılamaktadır. Ayrıca her iki değerlendiriciye göre Amaca Uygunluk Standartları 88,9, Fizibilite Standartları 75, Doğruluk Standartları 100 oranında karşılanırken, Uygunluk Standartları dış değerlendiriciye göre 87,5, iç değerlendiriciye göre ise 75 oranında karşılanmaktadır. Bunun yanında uzmanlar araştırmada özellikle kültürel değerler, çıkarlar, bağlamlar ve çıkar çatışmaları kavramları hakkında yeterli bilgi sağlanmadığı görüşündedir. Araştırma bulgularından yola çıkarak program değerlendirme ve meta-değerlendirme çalışmalarının daha etkin bir biçimde yürütülmesine yönelik öneriler sunulmuştur.

Makale detayları

A META-EVALUATION RESEARCH ON MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION COURSE

Yazarlar:

Muhammed Akıncı | Erdoğan Köse

Yayıncı:

Trakya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar

Dergi:

Trakya Eğitim Dergisi Vol.13 Issue 2, pp.817-829

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001290195

pISSN:

2630-6301

Meta-Evaluation

program evaluation

measurement-evaluation

program standardsMeta-değerlendirme

program değerlendirme

ölçme-değerlendirme

program standartları

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Muhammed Akıncı | Erdoğan Köse

Yayıncı: Trakya University

Ana Başlıklar: Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar

Dergi: Trakya Eğitim Dergisi Vol.13 Issue 2, pp.817-829

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 5/2023

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001290195

pISSN: 2630-6301

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Muhammed Akıncı | Erdoğan Köse

Yayıncı:

Trakya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar

Dergi:

Trakya Eğitim Dergisi Vol.13 Issue 2, pp.817-829

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001290195

pISSN:

2630-6301