MEASUREMENT OF ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY THROUGH MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS AND INTEGRATION WITH COPELAND METHOD: A STUDY ON OECD COUNTRIES

Sude Teker; Selen Avcı Azkeskin; Zerrin Aladağ

Makale detayları

MEASUREMENT OF ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY THROUGH MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS AND INTEGRATION WITH COPELAND METHOD: A STUDY ON OECD COUNTRIES

Yazarlar:

Sude Teker | Selen Avcı Azkeskin | Zerrin Aladağ

Yayıncı:

Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University

Ana Başlıklar:

Yöneylem

Dergi:

Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi Vol.20 Issue 4, pp.871-895

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001336910

pISSN:

2147-9208

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Energy is a necessity for the continuation of daily life. Contemporary factors such as technological advancements, industrialization, and population growth have further increased the demand for energy. Due to this increase, non-renewable energy sources have faced the threat of depletion, leading to a rise in energy costs and the emission of harmful gases into the environment. High costs have increased the dependence of many countries that meet their energy needs through imports, thereby impacting their economies. Therefore, energy sustainability has become crucial for nations. Currently, most countries prioritize energy sustainability and implement various policies in this regard. In this study, the energy sustainability of 36 OECD Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development countries, for which data is available, is compared using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making MCDM methods based on 15 criteria. The criteria are weighted using the CRITIC Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation method, and the alternatives are ranked using PROMETHEE Preference Ranking Organisation Method for Enrichment Evaluations, VIKOR VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje, and Grey Relational Analysis GRA methods. The obtained rankings are integrated using the Copeland method. Additionally, the relationship among the four methods is analyzed using the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient. According to the CRITIC method, the most prioritized criterion is electricity generation from solar energy. According to the results obtained from PROMETHEE, GRA, and the Copeland method, Switzerland emerges as the best alternative in terms of energy sustainability, while according to the VIKOR method, Germany is the best alternative. South Korea ranks last in all rankings. The most similar rankings, according to the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient, are derived from the PROMETHEE and Copeland methods.

 Energy is a necessity for the continuation of daily life. Contemporary factors such as technological advancements, industrialization, and population growth have further increased the demand for energy. Due to this increase, non-renewable energy sources have faced the threat of depletion, leading to a rise in energy costs and the emission of harmful gases into the environment. High costs have increased the dependence of many countries that meet their energy needs through imports, thereby impacting their economies. Therefore, energy sustainability has become crucial for nations. Currently, most countries prioritize energy sustainability and implement various policies in this regard. In this study, the energy sustainability of 36 OECD Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development countries, for which data is available, is compared using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making MCDM methods based on 15 criteria. The criteria are weighted using the CRITIC Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation method, and the alternatives are ranked using PROMETHEE Preference Ranking Organisation Method for Enrichment Evaluations, VIKOR VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje, and Grey Relational Analysis GRA methods. The obtained rankings are integrated using the Copeland method. Additionally, the relationship among the four methods is analyzed using the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient. According to the CRITIC method, the most prioritized criterion is electricity generation from solar energy. According to the results obtained from PROMETHEE, GRA, and the Copeland method, Switzerland emerges as the best alternative in terms of energy sustainability, while according to the VIKOR method, Germany is the best alternative. South Korea ranks last in all rankings. The most similar rankings, according to the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient, are derived from the PROMETHEE and Copeland methods.

 Energy is a necessity for the continuation of daily life. Contemporary factors such as technological advancements, industrialization, and population growth have further increased the demand for energy. Due to this increase, non-renewable energy sources have faced the threat of depletion, leading to a rise in energy costs and the emission of harmful gases into the environment. High costs have increased the dependence of many countries that meet their energy needs through imports, thereby impacting their economies. Therefore, energy sustainability has become crucial for nations. Currently, most countries prioritize energy sustainability and implement various policies in this regard. In this study, the energy sustainability of 36 OECD Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development countries, for which data is available, is compared using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making MCDM methods based on 15 criteria. The criteria are weighted using the CRITIC Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation method, and the alternatives are ranked using PROMETHEE Preference Ranking Organisation Method for Enrichment Evaluations, VIKOR VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje, and Grey Relational Analysis GRA methods. The obtained rankings are integrated using the Copeland method. Additionally, the relationship among the four methods is analyzed using the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient. According to the CRITIC method, the most prioritized criterion is electricity generation from solar energy. According to the results obtained from PROMETHEE, GRA, and the Copeland method, Switzerland emerges as the best alternative in terms of energy sustainability, while according to the VIKOR method, Germany is the best alternative. South Korea ranks last in all rankings. The most similar rankings, according to the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient, are derived from the PROMETHEE and Copeland methods.

 Günlük hayatın devamı için enerji bir zorunluluktur. Günümüzde yaşanan teknolojik gelişmeler, sanayileşme ve nüfus artışı gibi nedenler enerjiye olan ihtiyacı daha da arttırmıştır. Bu artışa bağlı olarak yenilenemeyen enerji kaynakları tükenme tehlikesi ile karşı karşıya kalmış; enerji maliyetleri ve zararlı gazların çevreye salınımı artmıştır. Yüksek maliyetler, enerji ihtiyacını ithalat yoluyla karşılayan birçok ülkenin dışa bağımlılığını arttırarak ekonomisini etkilemiştir. Dolayısıyla, enerji sürdürülebilirliği ülkeler için hayati öneme sahip olmuştur. Günümüzde çoğu ülke enerji sürdürülebilirliğine önem vermekte ve bu alanda çeşitli politikalar yürütmektedir. Bu çalışmada, verileri temin edilebilen 36 OECD Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development ülkesinin enerji sürdürülebilirliği 15 kriter kullanılarak Çok Kriterli Karar Verme ÇKKV yöntemleri ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Kriterler CRITIC Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation yöntemi ile ağırlıklandırılmış; alternatifler PROMETHEE Preference Ranking Organisation Method For Enrichment Evaluations, VIKOR VIseKriterijumsa Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje ve Gri İlişkisel Analiz GİA yöntemleri ile sıralanmıştır. Elde edilen sıralamalar Copeland yöntemi kullanılarak birleştirilmiştir. Ayrıca, 4 yöntemin birbiri ile ilişkisi Spearman Sıra Korelasyon Katsayısı ile analiz edilmiştir. CRITIC yöntemine göre en öncelikli kriter güneş enerjisinden elektrik üretimidir. PROMETHEE, GİA ve Copeland yönteminden elde edilen sonuçlara göre enerji sürdürülebilirliği bakımından en iyi alternatif İsviçre olurken, VIKOR yöntemine göre Almanya en iyi alternatiftir. Güney Kore tüm sıralamalarda son sırada yer almıştır. Spearman Korelasyon Katsayısına göre en benzer sıralamalar PROMETHEE ve Copeland yöntemlerinden elde edilen sıralamalardır.

Makale detayları

MEASUREMENT OF ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY THROUGH MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS AND INTEGRATION WITH COPELAND METHOD: A STUDY ON OECD COUNTRIES

Yazarlar:

Sude Teker | Selen Avcı Azkeskin | Zerrin Aladağ

Yayıncı:

Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University

Ana Başlıklar:

Yöneylem

Dergi:

Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi Vol.20 Issue 4, pp.871-895

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001336910

pISSN:

2147-9208

Energy Sustainability

Copeland

PROMETHEE

VIKOR

Grey Relational Analysis (GRA)Enerji Sürdürülebilirliği

Copeland

PROMETHEE

VIKOR

Gri İlişkisel Analiz (GİA)

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Sude Teker | Selen Avcı Azkeskin | Zerrin Aladağ

Yayıncı: Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University

Ana Başlıklar: Yöneylem

Dergi: Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi Vol.20 Issue 4, pp.871-895

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 12/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001336910

pISSN: 2147-9208

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Sude Teker | Selen Avcı Azkeskin | Zerrin Aladağ

Yayıncı:

Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University

Ana Başlıklar:

Yöneylem

Dergi:

Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi Vol.20 Issue 4, pp.871-895

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001336910

pISSN:

2147-9208