Mullā Rajab Ali Tabrīzī's Criticism of Mullā Sadrā in the Context of his Treatise Isbāt al-Wājib and Objections to Tabrīzī

Sinan Yılmaz

Makale detayları

Mullā Rajab Ali Tabrīzī's Criticism of Mullā Sadrā in the Context of his Treatise Isbāt al-Wājib and Objections to Tabrīzī

Yazarlar:

Sinan Yılmaz

Yayıncı:

Yozgat Bozok University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sistematik Felsefe (Diğer) | İslam Araştırmaları (Diğer)

Dergi:

Bozok Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.25 Issue 25, pp.333-360

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321982

pISSN:

2458-9934

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 This study aims to discuss the criticisms of Mullā Sadrās philosophy in Mullā Rajab ʿAli Tabrīzīs treatise Isbāt al-Wājib and the objections to Tabrīzī. Mullā Sadrā is one of the most important representatives of Islamic philosophy and contemporary Iranian philosophical thought. While he initially defended the philosophy of quiddity, which Suhrawardī represented, he later abandoned this idea and adopted the philosophy of existence. According to him, truth is equal to existence. For this reason, God, the greatest truth, consists of existence. Existence is a whole, but it has different densities. However, his philosophy of Transcendental Wisdom, which centers on existence, has been criticized in some aspects. One of these criticisms belongs to his contemporary Mullā Rajab Ali Tabrīzī. What makes Tabrīzīs criticisms valuable is that he was a contemporary of Mullā Ṣadrā, studied in the same area with him, was a philosopher like him and analyzed the issues philosophically. Tabrīzī does not accept Mullā Ṣadrās philosophy of existence and criticizes him under various headings in the aforementioned treatise. Tabrīzī begins his criticism of Mullā Sadrā with the issue of existence. He then criticizes the issue of attributes, the nobility of existence and the spiritual participation of existence, respectively. Various objections have been made to Tabrīzīs criticisms of Mullā Sadrā. One of these objections is the idea that Tabrīzī evaluates the abstract understanding of existence in the mind and the understanding of existence in external reality in the same category. In addition, Tabrīzī has been criticized for considering existence as an accident, for adopting the theory of sudūr emanation despite his rejection of spiritual participation in existence, and for his lack of quotations from thinkers of the past to support his own thought. In this study, his criticisms of Mullā Sadrā will be discussed using a dialectical method, and from time to time these criticisms will be criticized both by opposing views and by us.

 This study aims to discuss the criticisms of Mullā Sadrās philosophy in Mullā Rajab ʿAli Tabrīzīs treatise Isbāt al-Wājib and the objections to Tabrīzī. Mullā Sadrā is one of the most important representatives of Islamic philosophy and contemporary Iranian philosophical thought. While he initially defended the philosophy of quiddity, which Suhrawardī represented, he later abandoned this idea and adopted the philosophy of existence. According to him, truth is equal to existence. For this reason, God, the greatest truth, consists of existence. Existence is a whole, but it has different densities. However, his philosophy of Transcendental Wisdom, which centers on existence, has been criticized in some aspects. One of these criticisms belongs to his contemporary Mullā Rajab Ali Tabrīzī. What makes Tabrīzīs criticisms valuable is that he was a contemporary of Mullā Ṣadrā, studied in the same area with him, was a philosopher like him and analyzed the issues philosophically. Tabrīzī does not accept Mullā Ṣadrās philosophy of existence and criticizes him under various headings in the aforementioned treatise. Tabrīzī begins his criticism of Mullā Sadrā with the issue of existence. He then criticizes the issue of attributes, the nobility of existence and the spiritual participation of existence, respectively. Various objections have been made to Tabrīzīs criticisms of Mullā Sadrā. One of these objections is the idea that Tabrīzī evaluates the abstract understanding of existence in the mind and the understanding of existence in external reality in the same category. In addition, Tabrīzī has been criticized for considering existence as an accident, for adopting the theory of sudūr emanation despite his rejection of spiritual participation in existence, and for his lack of quotations from thinkers of the past to support his own thought. In this study, his criticisms of Mullā Sadrā will be discussed using a dialectical method, and from time to time these criticisms will be criticized both by opposing views and by us.

 This study aims to discuss the criticisms of Mullā Sadrās philosophy in Mullā Rajab ʿAli Tabrīzīs treatise Isbāt al-Wājib and the objections to Tabrīzī. Mullā Sadrā is one of the most important representatives of Islamic philosophy and contemporary Iranian philosophical thought. While he initially defended the philosophy of quiddity, which Suhrawardī represented, he later abandoned this idea and adopted the philosophy of existence. According to him, truth is equal to existence. For this reason, God, the greatest truth, consists of existence. Existence is a whole, but it has different densities. However, his philosophy of Transcendental Wisdom, which centers on existence, has been criticized in some aspects. One of these criticisms belongs to his contemporary Mullā Rajab Ali Tabrīzī. What makes Tabrīzīs criticisms valuable is that he was a contemporary of Mullā Ṣadrā, studied in the same area with him, was a philosopher like him and analyzed the issues philosophically. Tabrīzī does not accept Mullā Ṣadrās philosophy of existence and criticizes him under various headings in the aforementioned treatise. Tabrīzī begins his criticism of Mullā Sadrā with the issue of existence. He then criticizes the issue of attributes, the nobility of existence and the spiritual participation of existence, respectively. Various objections have been made to Tabrīzīs criticisms of Mullā Sadrā. One of these objections is the idea that Tabrīzī evaluates the abstract understanding of existence in the mind and the understanding of existence in external reality in the same category. In addition, Tabrīzī has been criticized for considering existence as an accident, for adopting the theory of sudūr emanation despite his rejection of spiritual participation in existence, and for his lack of quotations from thinkers of the past to support his own thought. In this study, his criticisms of Mullā Sadrā will be discussed using a dialectical method, and from time to time these criticisms will be criticized both by opposing views and by us.

 Bu çalışma Molla Recep Ali Tebrîzînin İsbât-ı Vâcib adlı risalesindeki Molla Sadrâ felsefesine yönelik eleştirileri ve Tebrîzîye yapılan itirazları ele almayı amaçlamaktadır. Molla Sadrâ, İslam felsefesinin ve çağdaş İran felsefî düşüncesinin önemli temsilcilerindendir. Başlangıçta Sühreverdînin temsilcisi olduğu mahiyet felsefesini savunurken daha sonra bu düşünceden vazgeçerek varlık felsefesini benimsemiştir. Ona göre hakikat varlık ile eşittir. Bu sebeple en büyük hakikat olan Tanrı varlıktan ibarettir. Varlık bir bütündür ancak farklı yoğunluklara sahiptir. Ancak onun varlığı merkeze alan Aşkın Hikmet felsefesi bazı yönleriyle eleştirilmiştir. Bu eleştirilerden birisi onun çağdaşı olan Molla Recep Ali Tebrîzîye aittir. Tebrîzînin eleştirilerini değerli kılan şey, Molla Sadrânın çağdaşı olması, onunla aynı havzada ders görmüş olması, onun gibi bir filozof olması ve meseleleri felsefî açıdan ele almasıdır. Tebrîzî, Molla Sadrânın varlık felsefesini kabul etmez ve söz konusu risalesinde çeşitli başlıklar altında onu eleştirir. Eleştirilerine varlık meselesiyle başlar. Daha sonra sırasıyla sıfatlar meselesi, varlığın asaleti ve varlığın manevî iştiraki meselelerini eleştirir. Tebrîzînin Molla Sadrâya yaptığı eleştirilere çeşitli itirazlar da yapılmıştır. Bu itirazlardan biri Tebrîzînin zihindeki soyut varlık anlayışı ile dış gerçeklikteki varlık anlayışını aynı kategoride değerlendirdiği fikri gelmektedir. Bunun yanında Tebrîzînin varlığı bir araz olarak değerlendirmiş olması, varlıktaki manevî iştiraki kabul etmemesine rağmen sudûr teorisini benimsemiş olması, kendi düşüncesini desteklemek amacıyla geçmiş dönemdeki düşünürlerden yaptığı alıntıların eksik olmasından dolayı eleştirilmiştir. Bu çalışmada diyalektik bir yöntemle Tebrîzînin Molla Sadrâya yaptığı eleştiriler ele alınacak ve zaman zaman bu eleştiriler hem karşıt görüşlerle hem de tarafımızca eleştiriye tâbi tutulacaktır.

Makale detayları

Mullā Rajab Ali Tabrīzī's Criticism of Mullā Sadrā in the Context of his Treatise Isbāt al-Wājib and Objections to Tabrīzī

Yazarlar:

Sinan Yılmaz

Yayıncı:

Yozgat Bozok University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sistematik Felsefe (Diğer) | İslam Araştırmaları (Diğer)

Dergi:

Bozok Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.25 Issue 25, pp.333-360

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321982

pISSN:

2458-9934

Islamic Philosophy

Mullā Ṣadrā

Rajab ʿAli Tabrīzī

Isbāt al-Wājib

Philosophical Criticism

Shīʿaİslam Felsefesi

Molla Sadrâ

Recep Ali Tebrîzî

İsbât-ı Vâcip

Felsefe Eleştirisi

Şîa

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Sinan Yılmaz

Yayıncı: Yozgat Bozok University

Ana Başlıklar: Sistematik Felsefe (Diğer) | İslam Araştırmaları (Diğer)

Dergi: Bozok Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.25 Issue 25, pp.333-360

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001321982

pISSN: 2458-9934

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Sinan Yılmaz

Yayıncı:

Yozgat Bozok University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sistematik Felsefe (Diğer) | İslam Araştırmaları (Diğer)

Dergi:

Bozok Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.25 Issue 25, pp.333-360

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321982

pISSN:

2458-9934