The Effects of the Qirāʾāt İḥtijāj Practices of the II-IVth Century of Hijra on the Qirāʾāt İḥtijāj Practices of the Later Period: A Study on Nashr Al-Qirāʾāt al-ʿAshr,

Mehmet Kılıç; Muhammed Pilgir

Makale detayları

The Effects of the Qirāʾāt İḥtijāj Practices of the II-IVth Century of Hijra on the Qirāʾāt İḥtijāj Practices of the Later Period: A Study on Nashr Al-Qirāʾāt al-ʿAshr,

Yazarlar:

Mehmet Kılıç | Muhammed Pilgir

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kuran-ı Kerim Okuma ve Kıraat

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.26 Issue 49, pp.327-352

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001319522

pISSN:

2146-9806

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The concept of iḥtijāj, which means to justify anything, has emerged along with the debates caused by the differences in adāʾ. The concept of iḥtijāj refers to the presentation of the scientific basis for the varieties that arise in the science of qirāʾāt with respect to the qurrāʾ with various arguments. The literature in which iḥtijāj of qirāʾāt were included appeared at the end of the 2nd century of hijra, and in addition iḥtijāj enforcements were also included in the general literature of qirāʾāt. As a matter of fact, the possible delusions that may arise in the minds of the interlocutors due to variant readings of the Qurʾān are intended to be dispelled by the practices iḥtijāj of qirāʾāt, with the aim of clarifying the scientific basis of the relevant of the qirāʾāt variants. In this context, one of the practices in the traditions of maʿānī l-Qurʾān that emerged in the 2nd century of hijra and maʿānī l-qirāʾāt that emerged in the 4th century of hijra is the iḥtijāj of qirāʾāt. Thus, Ibn al-Jazarī, likewise, in his work Nashr al-qirāʾāt al-ʿashr, in which the variants of qirāʾāt are presented, occasionally makes applications of iḥtijāj by justifying the variant readings of the Qurʾān. Although there are studies on iḥtijāj of qirāʾāt among the modern period studies, there are not quite studies on the iḥtijāj practices in Ibn al-Jazarīs Nashr. As a matter of fact, as far as can be ascertained, there is a study titled en-Neşr Bağlamında İbnül-Cezerînin Kıraatleri Delillendirme ve Değerlendirme Metodu conducted by Mehdī Dahīm on the iḥtijâc practices in Ibn al-Jazarīs Nashr. However, in this study, it was observed that let alone the qirāʾāt literature, regarding the iḥtijāj of qirāʾāt, the literature of maʿānī l-Qurʾān and maʿānī l-qirāʾāt were not used, and it was determined that other Islamic disciplines such as tafsīr and Arabic language were not utilized sufficiently. For this reason, we believe that the aforementioned work of Dahīm is insufficient. In this study, the comparison of the qirāʾāt iḥtijāj, which emerged in the context of Ibn al-Jazarīs Nashr, with the maʿānī l-Qurʾān and maʿānī l-qirāʾāt literature has been revealed. From this point of view, this study aims to examine Ibn al-Jazarīs iḥtijāj practices in the context of Nashr al-qirāʾāt al-ʿashr and to investigate the influence of the works belonging to the traditions of maʿānī l-Qurʾān and maʿānī l-qirāʾāt written between the second and fourth centuries of the Hijra on Ibn al-Jazarīs tawjīhs.

 The concept of iḥtijāj, which means to justify anything, has emerged along with the debates caused by the differences in adāʾ. The concept of iḥtijāj refers to the presentation of the scientific basis for the varieties that arise in the science of qirāʾāt with respect to the qurrāʾ with various arguments. The literature in which iḥtijāj of qirāʾāt were included appeared at the end of the 2nd century of hijra, and in addition iḥtijāj enforcements were also included in the general literature of qirāʾāt. As a matter of fact, the possible delusions that may arise in the minds of the interlocutors due to variant readings of the Qurʾān are intended to be dispelled by the practices iḥtijāj of qirāʾāt, with the aim of clarifying the scientific basis of the relevant of the qirāʾāt variants. In this context, one of the practices in the traditions of maʿānī l-Qurʾān that emerged in the 2nd century of hijra and maʿānī l-qirāʾāt that emerged in the 4th century of hijra is the iḥtijāj of qirāʾāt. Thus, Ibn al-Jazarī, likewise, in his work Nashr al-qirāʾāt al-ʿashr, in which the variants of qirāʾāt are presented, occasionally makes applications of iḥtijāj by justifying the variant readings of the Qurʾān. Although there are studies on iḥtijāj of qirāʾāt among the modern period studies, there are not quite studies on the iḥtijāj practices in Ibn al-Jazarīs Nashr. As a matter of fact, as far as can be ascertained, there is a study titled en-Neşr Bağlamında İbnül-Cezerînin Kıraatleri Delillendirme ve Değerlendirme Metodu conducted by Mehdī Dahīm on the iḥtijâc practices in Ibn al-Jazarīs Nashr. However, in this study, it was observed that let alone the qirāʾāt literature, regarding the iḥtijāj of qirāʾāt, the literature of maʿānī l-Qurʾān and maʿānī l-qirāʾāt were not used, and it was determined that other Islamic disciplines such as tafsīr and Arabic language were not utilized sufficiently. For this reason, we believe that the aforementioned work of Dahīm is insufficient. In this study, the comparison of the qirāʾāt iḥtijāj, which emerged in the context of Ibn al-Jazarīs Nashr, with the maʿānī l-Qurʾān and maʿānī l-qirāʾāt literature has been revealed. From this point of view, this study aims to examine Ibn al-Jazarīs iḥtijāj practices in the context of Nashr al-qirāʾāt al-ʿashr and to investigate the influence of the works belonging to the traditions of maʿānī l-Qurʾān and maʿānī l-qirāʾāt written between the second and fourth centuries of the Hijra on Ibn al-Jazarīs tawjīhs.

 The concept of iḥtijāj, which means to justify anything, has emerged along with the debates caused by the differences in adāʾ. The concept of iḥtijāj refers to the presentation of the scientific basis for the varieties that arise in the science of qirāʾāt with respect to the qurrāʾ with various arguments. The literature in which iḥtijāj of qirāʾāt were included appeared at the end of the 2nd century of hijra, and in addition iḥtijāj enforcements were also included in the general literature of qirāʾāt. As a matter of fact, the possible delusions that may arise in the minds of the interlocutors due to variant readings of the Qurʾān are intended to be dispelled by the practices iḥtijāj of qirāʾāt, with the aim of clarifying the scientific basis of the relevant of the qirāʾāt variants. In this context, one of the practices in the traditions of maʿānī l-Qurʾān that emerged in the 2nd century of hijra and maʿānī l-qirāʾāt that emerged in the 4th century of hijra is the iḥtijāj of qirāʾāt. Thus, Ibn al-Jazarī, likewise, in his work Nashr al-qirāʾāt al-ʿashr, in which the variants of qirāʾāt are presented, occasionally makes applications of iḥtijāj by justifying the variant readings of the Qurʾān. Although there are studies on iḥtijāj of qirāʾāt among the modern period studies, there are not quite studies on the iḥtijāj practices in Ibn al-Jazarīs Nashr. As a matter of fact, as far as can be ascertained, there is a study titled en-Neşr Bağlamında İbnül-Cezerînin Kıraatleri Delillendirme ve Değerlendirme Metodu conducted by Mehdī Dahīm on the iḥtijâc practices in Ibn al-Jazarīs Nashr. However, in this study, it was observed that let alone the qirāʾāt literature, regarding the iḥtijāj of qirāʾāt, the literature of maʿānī l-Qurʾān and maʿānī l-qirāʾāt were not used, and it was determined that other Islamic disciplines such as tafsīr and Arabic language were not utilized sufficiently. For this reason, we believe that the aforementioned work of Dahīm is insufficient. In this study, the comparison of the qirāʾāt iḥtijāj, which emerged in the context of Ibn al-Jazarīs Nashr, with the maʿānī l-Qurʾān and maʿānī l-qirāʾāt literature has been revealed. From this point of view, this study aims to examine Ibn al-Jazarīs iḥtijāj practices in the context of Nashr al-qirāʾāt al-ʿashr and to investigate the influence of the works belonging to the traditions of maʿānī l-Qurʾān and maʿānī l-qirāʾāt written between the second and fourth centuries of the Hijra on Ibn al-Jazarīs tawjīhs.

 Kurrâya nispet edilen aynı kelimelerdeki edâ farklılıklarının tartışmalara sebep olmasından ötürü kıraat ihtilafı olan kelimelerde ihticâc yapılmasına gereksinim duyulmuştur. Delil getirmek manasında kullanılan ihticâc kavramı, kıraat ihtilafları için söz konusu olduğunda ise kıraat ihtilaflarının sıhhat zemininin ortaya konması kastedilmektedir. Ayrıca 2. asrın sonlarında kıraat tevcîhlerinin yapıldığı müstakil eserler ortaya çıkmakla birlikte kıraat alan yazınına ait genel telifatlarda da kıraat ihticâclarının yapıldığı görülmektedir. Kıraat müelliflerinden biri olan İbnul-Cezerî de Neşrul-ḳırââtil-aşr adlı eserinde zaman zaman kıraat ihticâcına yer vermektedir. Mezkûr eserdeki kıraat ihticâcları hakkında tespit edilebildiği kadarıyla yapılmış tek bir çalışma bulunmaktadır. Fakat bu çalışmada, kıraatten ve bunun dışındaki disiplinlerden yeterince istifade edilmediği belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca selef ulemasının Neşrul-ḳırââtil-aşr adlı esere ihticâc konusunda etkisi özelinde bir çalışmaya da rastlanmamıştır. Buradan hareketle elinizdeki bu çalışmada, İbnul-Ce-zerînin kıraat ihticâcına dair uygulamaları Neşrul-ḳırââtil-aşr adlı eser özelinde incelenmiş, meânil-Kurân ve meânil-kıraat literatürlerinin ortaya çıktıkları dönem dikkate alınarak h. 2.-4. asırlarda kaleme alınan bu literatürlere ait eserlerin İbnul-Cezerîye ait kıraat tevcîhlerine etkisinin olup olmadığı araştırılmıştır. Çalışmanın neticesinde İbnul-Cezerînin yaptığı kıraat tevcîhlerinden ele alınanların bir kısmına, söz konusu üç asırda kaleme alınan meânil-Kurân ve meânil-kıraat telifatında ekseriyetle yer verilmediği saptanmıştır. İbnul-Cezerînin ise kıraat ihtilafının olmadığı yerlerde dahi ilgili edâ için ihticâc yaptığı müşahede edilmiştir. Buna ilaveten İbnul-Cezerînin Neşrde yaptığı ihticâc uygulamalarının meânil-Kurân ve meânil-kıraat telifatında yapılan ihticâc işlemleriyle benzeştiği görülmüştür. Yine Neşrin tevcîh eseri olmaması hasebiyle de İbnul-Cezerî tarafından yapılan ihticâcların ihtiyaç merkezli olarak kendini gösterdiği belirlenmiştir.

Makale detayları

The Effects of the Qirāʾāt İḥtijāj Practices of the II-IVth Century of Hijra on the Qirāʾāt İḥtijāj Practices of the Later Period: A Study on Nashr Al-Qirāʾāt al-ʿAshr,

Yazarlar:

Mehmet Kılıç | Muhammed Pilgir

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kuran-ı Kerim Okuma ve Kıraat

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.26 Issue 49, pp.327-352

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001319522

pISSN:

2146-9806

Qirāʾāt

Ibn al-Jazarī

Nashr al-Qirāʾāt al-ʿAshr

Iḥtijāj of Qirāʾāt

Maʿānī l-Qurʾān

Maʿānī l-QirāʾātKıraat

İbnu'l-Cezerî

Neşru’l-Ḳırââti’l-‘Aşr

Kıraat İhticâcı

Me‘âni’l-Ḳur’ân

Me‘âni’l-Ḳırâât

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Mehmet Kılıç | Muhammed Pilgir

Yayıncı: Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar: Kuran-ı Kerim Okuma ve Kıraat

Dergi: Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.26 Issue 49, pp.327-352

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001319522

pISSN: 2146-9806

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Mehmet Kılıç | Muhammed Pilgir

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kuran-ı Kerim Okuma ve Kıraat

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.26 Issue 49, pp.327-352

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001319522

pISSN:

2146-9806