Farmer Practices in Sugar Beet Production: The Case of Muş Province

Mustafa Yaşar; Kasım Şahin

Makale detayları

Farmer Practices in Sugar Beet Production: The Case of Muş Province

Yazarlar:

Mustafa Yaşar | Kasım Şahin

Yayıncı:

Igdir University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ziraat Mühendisliği

Dergi:

Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi Vol.13 Issue 3, pp.2195-2204

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001296849

pISSN:

2536-4618

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The aim of this study is to evaluate the business management and farmer practices in sugar beet farming enterprises in Muş province. In the study, the data obtained through face-to-face surveys in 2019 with 74 business owners producing sugar beet in Muş province were evaluated. In the evaluation, it has been determined that the majority of the producers produce on 25 decares or more of land, they produce an average of 6.1 t da-1 ton of sugar beet, the sugar beet obtained has an average annual polar rate of 17.7, and the sugar beet quota per producer is 388.3 tons. It has been determined that the producers have 10 years or more production experience, 89.2 of them do not have insurance for their products, 32.4 of them use credit and the majority of them 58.1 decide according to the product prices for the product to be planted in the next year. 70.3 of the producers planted in April, 29.7 in May, 77 of them irrigated 6-12 times, 28.4 of them applied potassium before harvesting and 32.4 of them planted after September, 67.6 It was determined that they preferred the first week of October. In addition to obtaining sugar raw materials, sugar beet agriculture provides resources for many products such as silage production, yeast and alcohol production by processing products such as molasses, sugar beet pulp, sugar beet leaves and contributes to employment in the countryside. In addition to its great contributions to the Turkish economy, the production of sugar beet, which provides raw materials for many industries, should be more systematically sustainable political, economic and agricultural practices in all aspects.

 The aim of this study is to evaluate the business management and farmer practices in sugar beet farming enterprises in Muş province. In the study, the data obtained through face-to-face surveys in 2019 with 74 business owners producing sugar beet in Muş province were evaluated. In the evaluation, it has been determined that the majority of the producers produce on 25 decares or more of land, they produce an average of 6.1 t da-1 ton of sugar beet, the sugar beet obtained has an average annual polar rate of 17.7, and the sugar beet quota per producer is 388.3 tons. It has been determined that the producers have 10 years or more production experience, 89.2 of them do not have insurance for their products, 32.4 of them use credit and the majority of them 58.1 decide according to the product prices for the product to be planted in the next year. 70.3 of the producers planted in April, 29.7 in May, 77 of them irrigated 6-12 times, 28.4 of them applied potassium before harvesting and 32.4 of them planted after September, 67.6 It was determined that they preferred the first week of October. In addition to obtaining sugar raw materials, sugar beet agriculture provides resources for many products such as silage production, yeast and alcohol production by processing products such as molasses, sugar beet pulp, sugar beet leaves and contributes to employment in the countryside. In addition to its great contributions to the Turkish economy, the production of sugar beet, which provides raw materials for many industries, should be more systematically sustainable political, economic and agricultural practices in all aspects.

 The aim of this study is to evaluate the business management and farmer practices in sugar beet farming enterprises in Muş province. In the study, the data obtained through face-to-face surveys in 2019 with 74 business owners producing sugar beet in Muş province were evaluated. In the evaluation, it has been determined that the majority of the producers produce on 25 decares or more of land, they produce an average of 6.1 t da-1 ton of sugar beet, the sugar beet obtained has an average annual polar rate of 17.7, and the sugar beet quota per producer is 388.3 tons. It has been determined that the producers have 10 years or more production experience, 89.2 of them do not have insurance for their products, 32.4 of them use credit and the majority of them 58.1 decide according to the product prices for the product to be planted in the next year. 70.3 of the producers planted in April, 29.7 in May, 77 of them irrigated 6-12 times, 28.4 of them applied potassium before harvesting and 32.4 of them planted after September, 67.6 It was determined that they preferred the first week of October. In addition to obtaining sugar raw materials, sugar beet agriculture provides resources for many products such as silage production, yeast and alcohol production by processing products such as molasses, sugar beet pulp, sugar beet leaves and contributes to employment in the countryside. In addition to its great contributions to the Turkish economy, the production of sugar beet, which provides raw materials for many industries, should be more systematically sustainable political, economic and agricultural practices in all aspects.

 Bu çalışmada amaç, Muş ilinde şeker pancarı yetiştiriciliği yapan işletmelerde işletme yönetimi ve çiftçi uygulamalarına yönelik değerlendirme yapmaktır. Çalışmada, Muş ilinde şeker pancarı üretimi yapan 74 işletme sahibi ile 2019 yılında yüz yüze anket yoluyla elde edilen veriler değerlendirilmiştir. Yapılan değerlendirmede üreticilerin büyük çoğunluğunun 25 dekar ve üzeri arazide üretim yaptıkları, ortalama 6.1 t da-1 ton şeker pancarı elde ettikleri ve elde edilen şeker pancarının yıllık ortalama 17.7 polar oranına sahip olduğu, üretici başına şeker pancarı kota miktarının 388.3 ton olduğu belirlenmiştir. Üreticilerin 10 yıl ve üzeri üretim deneyimine sahip oldukları, 89.2sinin ürünlerine sigorta yaptırmadıkları, 32.4ünün kredi kullandıkları ve bir sonraki yıl ekilecek ürün için büyük çoğunluğunun 58.1 ürün fiyatlarına göre karar verdikleri belirlenmiştir. Üreticilerin 70.3ünün Nisan, 29.7sinin Mayıs ayı içinde ekim yaptıkları, 77nin 6-12 kez arasında sulama yaptıkları, 28.4ünün söküm öncesi potasyum uygulaması yaptığı ve sökümleri 32.4ünün Eylül ayı sonrasında, 67.6sının Ekim ayı ilk haftasını tercih ettikleri belirlenmiştir. Şeker pancarı tarımı şeker hammaddesinin elde edilmesinin yanında melas, şeker pancarı posası, şeker pancarı yaprakları gibi ürünlerin işlenmesiyle silaj yapımı, maya ve alkol üretimi gibi birçok ürüne kaynak oluşturmak ve kırsalda istihdama katkı sağlamaktadır. Türkiye ekonomisine büyük katkıları yanında birçok sanayi koluna hammadde sağlayan şeker pancarı bitkisi üretiminin her yönüyle daha sistematik olarak siyasi, ekonomik ve tarımsal uygulamalar sürdürülebilirliği sağlanmalıdır.

Makale detayları

Farmer Practices in Sugar Beet Production: The Case of Muş Province

Yazarlar:

Mustafa Yaşar | Kasım Şahin

Yayıncı:

Igdir University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ziraat Mühendisliği

Dergi:

Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi Vol.13 Issue 3, pp.2195-2204

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001296849

pISSN:

2536-4618

Sugar beet

Farmer application

Production

Muş provinceŞeker pancarı

Çiftçi uygulamaları

Üretim

Muş ili

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Mustafa Yaşar | Kasım Şahin

Yayıncı: Igdir University

Ana Başlıklar: Ziraat Mühendisliği

Dergi: Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi Vol.13 Issue 3, pp.2195-2204

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 1/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001296849

pISSN: 2536-4618

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Mustafa Yaşar | Kasım Şahin

Yayıncı:

Igdir University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ziraat Mühendisliği

Dergi:

Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi Vol.13 Issue 3, pp.2195-2204

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001296849

pISSN:

2536-4618