Are the Environmental Policy Shocks to the Ecological Footprint Permanent in the Example of BRICS Countries and Tükiye?

Sevcan Kapkara Kaya; Abdullah Göv

Makale detayları

Are the Environmental Policy Shocks to the Ecological Footprint Permanent in the Example of BRICS Countries and Tükiye?

Yazarlar:

Sevcan Kapkara Kaya | Abdullah Göv

Yayıncı:

Bingol University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ekonomi

Dergi:

Bingöl Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.7 Issue 1, pp.31-44

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001294453

pISSN:

2651-3234

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The aim of this study is to examine the stationarity of the ecological footprint EFper capita in the BRICS countries Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa and Türkiye BRICST. In this direction, the series structure of each country is classified in terms of linear and non-linearity, and according to these results, appropriate unit root tests are preferred. Thanks to this stationarity analysis, inferences are made as to whether the shocks in the ecological footprint of these countries are permanent or not. In the study, annual data was used for the period 1961-2017, and then this data set was tested with linear and nonlinear unit root tests. In the findings obtained from the study, according to Sollis 2009 test results, the ecological footprint series is stationary only in Russia; Harvey et al. 2013 test results show that the ecological footprint series is stationary in Russia and Tükiye. The results of other countries revealed that the ecological footprint series is not stationary at level values.

 The aim of this study is to examine the stationarity of the ecological footprint EFper capita in the BRICS countries Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa and Türkiye BRICST. In this direction, the series structure of each country is classified in terms of linear and non-linearity, and according to these results, appropriate unit root tests are preferred. Thanks to this stationarity analysis, inferences are made as to whether the shocks in the ecological footprint of these countries are permanent or not. In the study, annual data was used for the period 1961-2017, and then this data set was tested with linear and nonlinear unit root tests. In the findings obtained from the study, according to Sollis 2009 test results, the ecological footprint series is stationary only in Russia; Harvey et al. 2013 test results show that the ecological footprint series is stationary in Russia and Tükiye. The results of other countries revealed that the ecological footprint series is not stationary at level values.

 The aim of this study is to examine the stationarity of the ecological footprint EFper capita in the BRICS countries Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa and Türkiye BRICST. In this direction, the series structure of each country is classified in terms of linear and non-linearity, and according to these results, appropriate unit root tests are preferred. Thanks to this stationarity analysis, inferences are made as to whether the shocks in the ecological footprint of these countries are permanent or not. In the study, annual data was used for the period 1961-2017, and then this data set was tested with linear and nonlinear unit root tests. In the findings obtained from the study, according to Sollis 2009 test results, the ecological footprint series is stationary only in Russia; Harvey et al. 2013 test results show that the ecological footprint series is stationary in Russia and Tükiye. The results of other countries revealed that the ecological footprint series is not stationary at level values.

 Bu çalışmanın amacı, BRICS ülkelerinde Brezilya, Rusya, Hindistan, Çin ve Güney Afrika ve Türkiyede BRICST kişi başına düşen ekolojik ayak izi EF serisinin durağanlığını incelemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, her bir ülkeye ait seri yapısı doğrusal olma ve doğrusal olmama bakımından sınıflandırılmıştır. Elde edilen doğrusallık durumu sonuçlarına göre her bir ülke verisinin analizinde uygun birim kök testi tercih edilmiştir. Bu durağanlık incelemesi sayesinde bu ülkelerin ekolojik ayak izinde ortaya çıkan şokların kalıcı olup olmadığına ilişkin çıkarımlar yapılmıştır. Çalışmada, 1961-2017 dönemine ait yıllık veriler doğrusal olan ve doğrusal olmayan birim kök testleri ile sınanmıştır. Çalışmadan elde edilen bulgularda, Sollis 2009 test sonuçlarına göre sadece Rusyada ekolojik ayak izi serisinin durağan olduğu; Harvey vd. 2013 test sonuçlarına göre ise Rusya ve Türkiyede ekolojik ayak izi serisinin durağan olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Diğer ülkelere ait sonuçlar ise ekolojik ayak izi serisinin düzey değerlerinde durağan olmadığını ortaya koymuştur.

Makale detayları

Are the Environmental Policy Shocks to the Ecological Footprint Permanent in the Example of BRICS Countries and Tükiye?

Yazarlar:

Sevcan Kapkara Kaya | Abdullah Göv

Yayıncı:

Bingol University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ekonomi

Dergi:

Bingöl Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.7 Issue 1, pp.31-44

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001294453

pISSN:

2651-3234

Environmental quality

ecological footprint

linear unit root

nonlinear unit rootÇevresel kalite

ekolojik ayak izi

doğrusal birim kök

doğrusal olmayan birim kök

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Sevcan Kapkara Kaya | Abdullah Göv

Yayıncı: Bingol University

Ana Başlıklar: Ekonomi

Dergi: Bingöl Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.7 Issue 1, pp.31-44

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001294453

pISSN: 2651-3234

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Sevcan Kapkara Kaya | Abdullah Göv

Yayıncı:

Bingol University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ekonomi

Dergi:

Bingöl Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.7 Issue 1, pp.31-44

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001294453

pISSN:

2651-3234