Attachment Fulfill in the House of the Debtor (EBL art. 79/a)

Mesut Köksoy

Makale detayları

Attachment Fulfill in the House of the Debtor (EBL art. 79/a)

Yazarlar:

Mesut Köksoy

Yayıncı:

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sivil Prosedür

Dergi:

Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi Issue 1, pp.327-367

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001311231

pISSN:

2149-5831

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 According to Article 21 of the Turkish Constitution, it is not allowed to enter a persons residence without a judges decision and the belongings therein cannot be confiscated. According to Article 80 of the Execution and Bankruptcy Law, there is no need to take a decision from the court in order to fulfill attachment in the debtors house. To ensure harmony between Constitution and the Law on Execution and Bankruptcy by the Law No. 7445, article 79a, titled attachment on the house, has been added to the Law. Accordingly, the bailiff must firstly have the foreclosure decision approved by the enforcement court in order to fulfill attachment in the debtors house. The enforcement court decides to approve the decision if it is understood that the place where the attachment is requested is a house. Upon notification of this decision to the enforcement office, attachment is carried out. If it is understood that the place where the attachment is requested is not a house, it is decided to cancel the decision of the bailiff. No legal remedy can be taken against the decisions. The aforesaid regulation does not apply to the provisional attachment. For this reason, it is not necessary to obtain the approval of the enforcement court in order to implement the provisional attachment decision in the house.

 According to Article 21 of the Turkish Constitution, it is not allowed to enter a persons residence without a judges decision and the belongings therein cannot be confiscated. According to Article 80 of the Execution and Bankruptcy Law, there is no need to take a decision from the court in order to fulfill attachment in the debtors house. To ensure harmony between Constitution and the Law on Execution and Bankruptcy by the Law No. 7445, article 79a, titled attachment on the house, has been added to the Law. Accordingly, the bailiff must firstly have the foreclosure decision approved by the enforcement court in order to fulfill attachment in the debtors house. The enforcement court decides to approve the decision if it is understood that the place where the attachment is requested is a house. Upon notification of this decision to the enforcement office, attachment is carried out. If it is understood that the place where the attachment is requested is not a house, it is decided to cancel the decision of the bailiff. No legal remedy can be taken against the decisions. The aforesaid regulation does not apply to the provisional attachment. For this reason, it is not necessary to obtain the approval of the enforcement court in order to implement the provisional attachment decision in the house.

 According to Article 21 of the Turkish Constitution, it is not allowed to enter a persons residence without a judges decision and the belongings therein cannot be confiscated. According to Article 80 of the Execution and Bankruptcy Law, there is no need to take a decision from the court in order to fulfill attachment in the debtors house. To ensure harmony between Constitution and the Law on Execution and Bankruptcy by the Law No. 7445, article 79a, titled attachment on the house, has been added to the Law. Accordingly, the bailiff must firstly have the foreclosure decision approved by the enforcement court in order to fulfill attachment in the debtors house. The enforcement court decides to approve the decision if it is understood that the place where the attachment is requested is a house. Upon notification of this decision to the enforcement office, attachment is carried out. If it is understood that the place where the attachment is requested is not a house, it is decided to cancel the decision of the bailiff. No legal remedy can be taken against the decisions. The aforesaid regulation does not apply to the provisional attachment. For this reason, it is not necessary to obtain the approval of the enforcement court in order to implement the provisional attachment decision in the house.

 Anayasanın 21inci maddesine göre, hâkim kararı olmaksızın bir kimsenin konutuna girilemez ve buradaki eşyalara el konulamaz. İcra ve İflâs Kanununun 80inci maddesine göre ise, borçlunun konutunda haciz yapılabilmesi için mahkemeden bir karar alınmasına gerek yoktur. 7445 sayılı Kanun ile, Anayasa ve İcra ve İflâs Kanunu arasında bir uyum sağlanabilmesi amacıyla Kanuna, konutta haciz başlığını taşıyan 79a maddesi eklenmiştir. Buna göre, icra müdürü, borçlunun konutunda haciz yapabilmek için öncelikle haciz kararını icra mahkemesine onaylatmalıdır. İcra mahkemesi, haciz yapılması istenen yerin konut olduğunun anlaşılması hâlinde kararın onaylanmasına karar verir. Bu kararın icra dairesine bildirilmesi üzerine haciz işlemleri yapılır. Haciz yapılması istenen yerin konut olmadığının anlaşılması hâlinde ise icra müdürünün kararının kaldırılmasına karar verilir. Verilen kararlara karşı kanun yoluna başvurulamaz. İhtiyatî haciz hakkında ise söz konusu düzenleme uygulanmaz. Bu nedenle, konutta ihtiyatî haciz kararının uygulanabilmesi için icra mahkemesinden onay alınması gerekmez.

Makale detayları

Attachment Fulfill in the House of the Debtor (EBL art. 79/a)

Yazarlar:

Mesut Köksoy

Yayıncı:

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sivil Prosedür

Dergi:

Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi Issue 1, pp.327-367

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001311231

pISSN:

2149-5831

Right to immunity of residence

rule of law principle

housing concept

attachment in the house

enforcement court decisionKonut dokunulmazlığı hakkı

hukuk devleti ilkesi

konut kavramı

konutta haciz

icra mahkemesi kararı

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Mesut Köksoy

Yayıncı: Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Ana Başlıklar: Sivil Prosedür

Dergi: Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi Issue 1, pp.327-367

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 1/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001311231

pISSN: 2149-5831

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Mesut Köksoy

Yayıncı:

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sivil Prosedür

Dergi:

Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi Issue 1, pp.327-367

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001311231

pISSN:

2149-5831