Evaluation of error types seen in digital panoramic radiographs

Bahar Kaplan; Ezgi Katı

Makale detayları

Evaluation of error types seen in digital panoramic radiographs

Yazarlar:

Bahar Kaplan | Ezgi Katı

Yayıncı:

Dicle University

Ana Başlıklar:

Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology

Dergi:

Dicle Dental Journal Vol.25 Issue 3, pp.73-78

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

9/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001327509

pISSN:

2822-6755

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Aims: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of different types of errors in panoramic radiography and explore potential correlations between these errors, age, and gender. Methods: A total of 2000 panoramic radiographs randomly selected from the patient archives of the Department of Oral, Dental, and Maxillofacial Radiology at Dicle University Faculty of Dentistry, taken in 2023 for various indications, were analyzed. Two experienced radiologists BK and EK reviewed the digital panoramic X-ray images. Interobserver agreement was assessed by having both observers re-evaluate 10 of the sample. Patients with developmental anomalies, history of trauma, orthognathic surgery, maxillofacial pathology e.g., tumorscysts, and those under 16 years old were excluded. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 20.0 software IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA, with a significance level set at α5. Cohens kappa statistics were utilized to calculate intraobserver agreement. Results: In the analysis of 2000 panoramic radiographs, it was found that 81.16 exhibited at least one error. The predominant error identified was the misplacement of the tongue against the palate, accounting for 34.75 of cases. A statistically significant association was observed between increasing patient age and higher error rates p0.05. However, no significant correlation was found between gender and error occurrence p0.05. Conclusion: The prevalence of positioning errors in panoramic radiography is considerable. It underscores the importance of providing adequate training to healthcare professionals and technicians to mitigate the risk of misinterpretation and unnecessary exposure to radiation.

 Aims: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of different types of errors in panoramic radiography and explore potential correlations between these errors, age, and gender. Methods: A total of 2000 panoramic radiographs randomly selected from the patient archives of the Department of Oral, Dental, and Maxillofacial Radiology at Dicle University Faculty of Dentistry, taken in 2023 for various indications, were analyzed. Two experienced radiologists BK and EK reviewed the digital panoramic X-ray images. Interobserver agreement was assessed by having both observers re-evaluate 10 of the sample. Patients with developmental anomalies, history of trauma, orthognathic surgery, maxillofacial pathology e.g., tumorscysts, and those under 16 years old were excluded. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 20.0 software IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA, with a significance level set at α5. Cohens kappa statistics were utilized to calculate intraobserver agreement. Results: In the analysis of 2000 panoramic radiographs, it was found that 81.16 exhibited at least one error. The predominant error identified was the misplacement of the tongue against the palate, accounting for 34.75 of cases. A statistically significant association was observed between increasing patient age and higher error rates p0.05. However, no significant correlation was found between gender and error occurrence p0.05. Conclusion: The prevalence of positioning errors in panoramic radiography is considerable. It underscores the importance of providing adequate training to healthcare professionals and technicians to mitigate the risk of misinterpretation and unnecessary exposure to radiation.

 Aims: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of different types of errors in panoramic radiography and explore potential correlations between these errors, age, and gender. Methods: A total of 2000 panoramic radiographs randomly selected from the patient archives of the Department of Oral, Dental, and Maxillofacial Radiology at Dicle University Faculty of Dentistry, taken in 2023 for various indications, were analyzed. Two experienced radiologists BK and EK reviewed the digital panoramic X-ray images. Interobserver agreement was assessed by having both observers re-evaluate 10 of the sample. Patients with developmental anomalies, history of trauma, orthognathic surgery, maxillofacial pathology e.g., tumorscysts, and those under 16 years old were excluded. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 20.0 software IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA, with a significance level set at α5. Cohens kappa statistics were utilized to calculate intraobserver agreement. Results: In the analysis of 2000 panoramic radiographs, it was found that 81.16 exhibited at least one error. The predominant error identified was the misplacement of the tongue against the palate, accounting for 34.75 of cases. A statistically significant association was observed between increasing patient age and higher error rates p0.05. However, no significant correlation was found between gender and error occurrence p0.05. Conclusion: The prevalence of positioning errors in panoramic radiography is considerable. It underscores the importance of providing adequate training to healthcare professionals and technicians to mitigate the risk of misinterpretation and unnecessary exposure to radiation.

 Aims: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of different types of errors in panoramic radiography and explore potential correlations between these errors, age, and gender. Methods: A total of 2000 panoramic radiographs randomly selected from the patient archives of the Department of Oral, Dental, and Maxillofacial Radiology at Dicle University Faculty of Dentistry, taken in 2023 for various indications, were analyzed. Two experienced radiologists BK and EK reviewed the digital panoramic X-ray images. Interobserver agreement was assessed by having both observers re-evaluate 10 of the sample. Patients with developmental anomalies, history of trauma, orthognathic surgery, maxillofacial pathology e.g., tumorscysts, and those under 16 years old were excluded. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 20.0 software IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA, with a significance level set at α5. Cohens kappa statistics were utilized to calculate intraobserver agreement. Results: In the analysis of 2000 panoramic radiographs, it was found that 81.16 exhibited at least one error. The predominant error identified was the misplacement of the tongue against the palate, accounting for 34.75 of cases. A statistically significant association was observed between increasing patient age and higher error rates p0.05. However, no significant correlation was found between gender and error occurrence p0.05. Conclusion: The prevalence of positioning errors in panoramic radiography is considerable. It underscores the importance of providing adequate training to healthcare professionals and technicians to mitigate the risk of misinterpretation and unnecessary exposure to radiation.

Makale detayları

Evaluation of error types seen in digital panoramic radiographs

Yazarlar:

Bahar Kaplan | Ezgi Katı

Yayıncı:

Dicle University

Ana Başlıklar:

Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology

Dergi:

Dicle Dental Journal Vol.25 Issue 3, pp.73-78

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

9/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001327509

pISSN:

2822-6755

Patient positioning

diagnostic errors

panoramic radiography

Sayı

Makale detayları

Evaluation of error types seen in digital panoramic radiographs

Yazarlar: Bahar Kaplan | Ezgi Katı

Yayıncı: Dicle University

Ana Başlıklar: Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology

Dergi: Dicle Dental Journal Vol.25 Issue 3, pp.73-78

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 9/2024

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001327509

pISSN: 2822-6755

Patient positioning

diagnostic errors

panoramic radiography

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Bahar Kaplan | Ezgi Katı

Yayıncı:

Dicle University

Ana Başlıklar:

Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology

Dergi:

Dicle Dental Journal Vol.25 Issue 3, pp.73-78

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

9/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001327509

pISSN:

2822-6755