The Issues of al-Hākim in Usūl al-Fiqh and its Effect on Siyāsa al-Sharī'ah: The Case of Imām al-Juwayni

Mahmoud Alnaffar

Makale detayları

The Issues of al-Hākim in Usūl al-Fiqh and its Effect on Siyāsa al-Sharī'ah: The Case of Imām al-Juwayni

Yazarlar:

Mahmoud Alnaffar

Yayıncı:

Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Dergiabant Vol.12 Issue 2, pp.711-731

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

11/2024

Belge Dili:

Arapça

Document ID (Org No.):

2001332176

pISSN:

2148-0494

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The rulers studies in the Islamic epistemological perspective enjoy pronounced importance, because of its many dimensions: theological, fundamentalism, and jurisprudence, and its deep effects on the various levels and fields of life. Given the treatment of the contemporary Muslim mind of the pillar of the ruler and related issues, it is noted that most of his discussions stem from the entrance of Islamic thought. Its discussion focuses on the idea of sovereignty in constitutional lt, as well as, dealing with its effects. This study shows that the fundamentalist approach with its verbal roots is the best approach to rooting the corner of the ruler. It believes that the Islamic political heritage is the best laboratory through which one can stand on the effects of this pillar and test its methodological capabilities. Al-Juwayni is one of the scholars who collected different sciences and compiled many works in which he combined the fundamentals of religion, the foundations of jurisprudence, jurisprudence, and legal politics, added to it deep political experience through his position with the Seljuk minister Nizam Al-Mulk, who enabled him and his students throughout the Seljuk state. The importance of this research can be seen from these facts and previous assumptions. Its importance increases given the epistemological challenges facing the concept of the ruler, such as the claim of his modernity at the hands of the Egyptian thinker Sayyid Qutb, or the invocation of some Mutazila sayings in this pillar to claim the rulership Al-Hakimiya of reason at the expense of Sharia. The study seeks to clarify the concept of the ruler and its dimensions through the fundamentalist approach, and then to demonstrate the impact of this concept in the political field. It relies on the choice Al-Juwayni as the anchor of the research because of his Ashari theological leadership, and fundamentalism in the way of the theologians, and politics by employing the science of jurisprudence in the determination of political facts and judgments. The researcher used the methods of description, content analysis and extrapolation. He concluded that there is no disagreement among Muslims including the Mutazila, that the ruler over reality is God Almighty. The dispute between Muslims is only in examining the period before the revelation of the laws, and it seeks to know the judgment of God, not degrade him, as the trend of contemporary Western political philosophies and theories see.

 The rulers studies in the Islamic epistemological perspective enjoy pronounced importance, because of its many dimensions: theological, fundamentalism, and jurisprudence, and its deep effects on the various levels and fields of life. Given the treatment of the contemporary Muslim mind of the pillar of the ruler and related issues, it is noted that most of his discussions stem from the entrance of Islamic thought. Its discussion focuses on the idea of sovereignty in constitutional lt, as well as, dealing with its effects. This study shows that the fundamentalist approach with its verbal roots is the best approach to rooting the corner of the ruler. It believes that the Islamic political heritage is the best laboratory through which one can stand on the effects of this pillar and test its methodological capabilities. Al-Juwayni is one of the scholars who collected different sciences and compiled many works in which he combined the fundamentals of religion, the foundations of jurisprudence, jurisprudence, and legal politics, added to it deep political experience through his position with the Seljuk minister Nizam Al-Mulk, who enabled him and his students throughout the Seljuk state. The importance of this research can be seen from these facts and previous assumptions. Its importance increases given the epistemological challenges facing the concept of the ruler, such as the claim of his modernity at the hands of the Egyptian thinker Sayyid Qutb, or the invocation of some Mutazila sayings in this pillar to claim the rulership Al-Hakimiya of reason at the expense of Sharia. The study seeks to clarify the concept of the ruler and its dimensions through the fundamentalist approach, and then to demonstrate the impact of this concept in the political field. It relies on the choice Al-Juwayni as the anchor of the research because of his Ashari theological leadership, and fundamentalism in the way of the theologians, and politics by employing the science of jurisprudence in the determination of political facts and judgments. The researcher used the methods of description, content analysis and extrapolation. He concluded that there is no disagreement among Muslims including the Mutazila, that the ruler over reality is God Almighty. The dispute between Muslims is only in examining the period before the revelation of the laws, and it seeks to know the judgment of God, not degrade him, as the trend of contemporary Western political philosophies and theories see.

 The rulers studies in the Islamic epistemological perspective enjoy pronounced importance, because of its many dimensions: theological, fundamentalism, and jurisprudence, and its deep effects on the various levels and fields of life. Given the treatment of the contemporary Muslim mind of the pillar of the ruler and related issues, it is noted that most of his discussions stem from the entrance of Islamic thought. Its discussion focuses on the idea of sovereignty in constitutional lt, as well as, dealing with its effects. This study shows that the fundamentalist approach with its verbal roots is the best approach to rooting the corner of the ruler. It believes that the Islamic political heritage is the best laboratory through which one can stand on the effects of this pillar and test its methodological capabilities. Al-Juwayni is one of the scholars who collected different sciences and compiled many works in which he combined the fundamentals of religion, the foundations of jurisprudence, jurisprudence, and legal politics, added to it deep political experience through his position with the Seljuk minister Nizam Al-Mulk, who enabled him and his students throughout the Seljuk state. The importance of this research can be seen from these facts and previous assumptions. Its importance increases given the epistemological challenges facing the concept of the ruler, such as the claim of his modernity at the hands of the Egyptian thinker Sayyid Qutb, or the invocation of some Mutazila sayings in this pillar to claim the rulership Al-Hakimiya of reason at the expense of Sharia. The study seeks to clarify the concept of the ruler and its dimensions through the fundamentalist approach, and then to demonstrate the impact of this concept in the political field. It relies on the choice Al-Juwayni as the anchor of the research because of his Ashari theological leadership, and fundamentalism in the way of the theologians, and politics by employing the science of jurisprudence in the determination of political facts and judgments. The researcher used the methods of description, content analysis and extrapolation. He concluded that there is no disagreement among Muslims including the Mutazila, that the ruler over reality is God Almighty. The dispute between Muslims is only in examining the period before the revelation of the laws, and it seeks to know the judgment of God, not degrade him, as the trend of contemporary Western political philosophies and theories see.

 el-Hâkim şerî hükmün kaynağı meseleleri, İslâmî epistemolojide birçok açıdan önemli bir yere ve öneme sahiptir. el-Hâkim meseleleri kelâmî, usulî, fıkhî açıdan aynı zamanda hayatın çeşitli düzeylerinde ve alanlarında derin etkiler bırakması bakımından önemlidir. Ayrıca, çağdaş Müslüman aklının el-Hâkim meselelerini ele alışına bakıldığında, tartışmaların çoğunlukla İslam düşüncesi bağlamında ele alındığı ve bu konudaki tartışmaların odak noktasının anayasal hukuktaki egemenlik fikri açısından incelendiği görülmektedir. Bu araştırma, kelâmî kökleri ile fıkıh usûlü yönteminin, el-hâkim meselelerini anlamak için en iyi yöntem olduğu iddiasını taşımaktadır. Ayrıca, siyâset-i şeriyye mirasının, el-hâkim meselelerinin etkileri üzerinde durma ve yöntemsel olarak bu etkileri test etme açısından en iyi laboratuvar olduğu iddiasını taşımaktadır. İmamul-Haremeyn el-Cüveynî, farklı ilimlerde uzman olan bir alımdır. Kelâm, fıkıh usûlü, fıkıh ve siyaset-i şeriyyeyi ilimlerini mezceden birçok eser yazmıştır. Bununla beraber derin siyasi uzmanlığı ve Selçuklu veziri Nizamülmülkün nezdindeki konumu sayesinde Nizâmülmülk, kendisine ve öğrencilerine Selçuklu devletinin her yerinde imkanlar sağlamıştır. Bu gerçeklerden ve önceki varsayımlardan hareketle, bu araştırmanın önemli olduğunu söylemek gerekir. Mısırlı düşünür Seyyid Kutubun savunduğu modernite iddiası ile el-hâkimin karşı karşıya kaldığı epistemolojik meydan okumalara ve şeri meselelerde seme karşı aklın hakimiyetini iddia eden Mutezilî bazı alimlerin görüşleri dikkate alındığında araştırmanın önemi artmaktadır. Araştırmanın genel amacı, el-hâkim mefhumu ve boyutlarını fıkıh usûlü açısından ortaya çıkarılması ve bu kavramın siyaset-i şeriyye alanındaki etkisinin ortaya konmasıdır. Konu ele alınırken Eşârî kelâmımın, mütekellimin yöntemini fıkıh usûlü yazımının bir öncüsü olan; siyasî hakikatleri ve hükümleri tespitinde fıkıh usûlü ilmini kullanan siyaset-i şeriyye uzmanı Cüveynînin el-hâkime yönelik yaklaşımını merkeze alınacaktır. Araştırmacı betimleme, analiz ve tümevarım yöntemlerini kullanmıştır. Hüsün ve Kubuha inanan Mutezile de dahil olmak üzere tüm Müslümanlar arasında, hakikat olarak mutlak hâkimin Yüce Allah olduğu konusunda hiçbir ihtilafın olmadığı, aralarındaki ihtilafın, dini hükümlerin nüzulünden önceki dönem için söz konusu olduğu ve Cenab-ı Hakkın hükmünü bilmenin gerekli olduğu ve çağdaş Batı siyaset felsefeleri ve teorilerinin benimsediğinin aksine onun hükmünden kopmanın mümkün olmadığı sonucuna varılmıştır.

Makale detayları

The Issues of al-Hākim in Usūl al-Fiqh and its Effect on Siyāsa al-Sharī'ah: The Case of Imām al-Juwayni

Yazarlar:

Mahmoud Alnaffar

Yayıncı:

Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Dergiabant Vol.12 Issue 2, pp.711-731

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

11/2024

Belge Dili:

Arapça

Document ID (Org No.):

2001332176

pISSN:

2148-0494

Islamic Law

the science of jurisprudence

legal politics

the ruler

improvement and blasphemy

Al-Juwayni

sovereignty

governanceİslam Hukuku

Fıkıh Usulü

Siyaset-i Şeriyye

el-Hâkim

Hüsün ve Kubuh

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Mahmoud Alnaffar

Yayıncı: Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University

Ana Başlıklar: İslam Hukuku

Dergi: Dergiabant Vol.12 Issue 2, pp.711-731

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 11/2024

Belge Dili: Arapça

Document ID (Org No.): 2001332176

pISSN: 2148-0494

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Mahmoud Alnaffar

Yayıncı:

Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Dergiabant Vol.12 Issue 2, pp.711-731

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

11/2024

Belge Dili:

Arapça

Document ID (Org No.):

2001332176

pISSN:

2148-0494