The Use of the Arts of al-Balāgha in Explanation of Fiqhī Issues: 'Abdulghanī al-Nāblusī's Work al-Nasīmu al-rebī'ī fī al-tajāzub al-badī'ī (An Analysis and A Critical Edition)

Muhammed Emin Görgün

Makale detayları

The Use of the Arts of al-Balāgha in Explanation of Fiqhī Issues: 'Abdulghanī al-Nāblusī's Work al-Nasīmu al-rebī'ī fī al-tajāzub al-badī'ī (An Analysis and A Critical Edition)

Yazarlar:

Muhammed Emin Görgün

Yayıncı:

Sivas Cumhuriyet University

Ana Başlıklar:

Arap Dili ve Belagatı | İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi Vol.28 Issue 2, pp.890-912

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001333367

pISSN:

2528-9861

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 al-Balāgha, which was used as a faculty by poets and orators during the period al-Jāhilīyah, reached its scientific maturation after the preparation and development period and subsequently became an independent branch in Arabic language sciences. The al-Badīʻ section of the al-Balāgha subjects saw the introduction of new disciplines, which were subsequently discussed under three headings: al-Maʻānī- al-Bayān- al-Badīʻ. This was spearheaded by Abū Yaʻqūb al-Sakkākī d. 6261229, and continued by the authors of the sharḥ and ḥāshiyat period following Sakkākī. One of these arts is the art of tajāzub, the definition and naming of which belongs to Saduddīn al-Taftāzānī d. 7921390. This art, which is employed as a literary term in many different disciplines, is also used effectively in the science of fiqh. One of the scholars who benefited from this art in the field of fiqh is Kuhistānī d. 9621555. Kuhistānī used the art of tajāzub to explain the issues of wujūb of ushr and khiyār al-shart in his work Jāmiur-rumūz. However, as the term tajāzub, as used by Kuhistānī was not understood in the scholarly world and remained an ambiguous expression, some treatises were written to elucidate what was meant by this expression. One of these is the treatise of Abdulghanī al-Nāblusī d. 11431731 called al-Nasīmu al-rebīī fī al-tajāzub al-badīī, which serves as the foundation of our study. The primary objective of al-Nāblusī wrote this treatise was to refute the arguments of Sayyid Ahmad al-Hamawī d. 10981687, who had written a concise treatise called Asna al-metālib fī beyānī mane al-tajāzub before him, with the aim of explaining the statements of Kuhistānī. al-Nāblusī saw this treatise by al-Hamawī and stated that he reached erroneous in some of his conclusions, and consequently he composed the aforementioned treatise as a refutation. Nāblusī, who criticized Hamawīs explanations, proceeded to re-explicate Kuhistānīs statements on the wujūb of ushr and khiyār al-shart in terms of the art of tajāzub and refuted Hamawīs six views on these issues, with the presentation of compelling evidence. Nāblusīs stands out with its rich use of sources, simple style and explanatory examples, and contains comprehensive information on the art of tajāzub. In this study, firstly, the concept of tajāzub is explained and the aforementioned treatise of Nāblusī is analysed in detail by comparing it with the treatise of Hamawī, which he refuted. At this point, firstly, the statement of Kuhistānī, which is the basis of the discussion, is given, then Hamawīs explanation on the subject is mentioned, and finally Nāblusīs refutation is given. In the last part of the study, the edited text of Nāblusīs treatise is given.

 al-Balāgha, which was used as a faculty by poets and orators during the period al-Jāhilīyah, reached its scientific maturation after the preparation and development period and subsequently became an independent branch in Arabic language sciences. The al-Badīʻ section of the al-Balāgha subjects saw the introduction of new disciplines, which were subsequently discussed under three headings: al-Maʻānī- al-Bayān- al-Badīʻ. This was spearheaded by Abū Yaʻqūb al-Sakkākī d. 6261229, and continued by the authors of the sharḥ and ḥāshiyat period following Sakkākī. One of these arts is the art of tajāzub, the definition and naming of which belongs to Saduddīn al-Taftāzānī d. 7921390. This art, which is employed as a literary term in many different disciplines, is also used effectively in the science of fiqh. One of the scholars who benefited from this art in the field of fiqh is Kuhistānī d. 9621555. Kuhistānī used the art of tajāzub to explain the issues of wujūb of ushr and khiyār al-shart in his work Jāmiur-rumūz. However, as the term tajāzub, as used by Kuhistānī was not understood in the scholarly world and remained an ambiguous expression, some treatises were written to elucidate what was meant by this expression. One of these is the treatise of Abdulghanī al-Nāblusī d. 11431731 called al-Nasīmu al-rebīī fī al-tajāzub al-badīī, which serves as the foundation of our study. The primary objective of al-Nāblusī wrote this treatise was to refute the arguments of Sayyid Ahmad al-Hamawī d. 10981687, who had written a concise treatise called Asna al-metālib fī beyānī mane al-tajāzub before him, with the aim of explaining the statements of Kuhistānī. al-Nāblusī saw this treatise by al-Hamawī and stated that he reached erroneous in some of his conclusions, and consequently he composed the aforementioned treatise as a refutation. Nāblusī, who criticized Hamawīs explanations, proceeded to re-explicate Kuhistānīs statements on the wujūb of ushr and khiyār al-shart in terms of the art of tajāzub and refuted Hamawīs six views on these issues, with the presentation of compelling evidence. Nāblusīs stands out with its rich use of sources, simple style and explanatory examples, and contains comprehensive information on the art of tajāzub. In this study, firstly, the concept of tajāzub is explained and the aforementioned treatise of Nāblusī is analysed in detail by comparing it with the treatise of Hamawī, which he refuted. At this point, firstly, the statement of Kuhistānī, which is the basis of the discussion, is given, then Hamawīs explanation on the subject is mentioned, and finally Nāblusīs refutation is given. In the last part of the study, the edited text of Nāblusīs treatise is given.

 al-Balāgha, which was used as a faculty by poets and orators during the period al-Jāhilīyah, reached its scientific maturation after the preparation and development period and subsequently became an independent branch in Arabic language sciences. The al-Badīʻ section of the al-Balāgha subjects saw the introduction of new disciplines, which were subsequently discussed under three headings: al-Maʻānī- al-Bayān- al-Badīʻ. This was spearheaded by Abū Yaʻqūb al-Sakkākī d. 6261229, and continued by the authors of the sharḥ and ḥāshiyat period following Sakkākī. One of these arts is the art of tajāzub, the definition and naming of which belongs to Saduddīn al-Taftāzānī d. 7921390. This art, which is employed as a literary term in many different disciplines, is also used effectively in the science of fiqh. One of the scholars who benefited from this art in the field of fiqh is Kuhistānī d. 9621555. Kuhistānī used the art of tajāzub to explain the issues of wujūb of ushr and khiyār al-shart in his work Jāmiur-rumūz. However, as the term tajāzub, as used by Kuhistānī was not understood in the scholarly world and remained an ambiguous expression, some treatises were written to elucidate what was meant by this expression. One of these is the treatise of Abdulghanī al-Nāblusī d. 11431731 called al-Nasīmu al-rebīī fī al-tajāzub al-badīī, which serves as the foundation of our study. The primary objective of al-Nāblusī wrote this treatise was to refute the arguments of Sayyid Ahmad al-Hamawī d. 10981687, who had written a concise treatise called Asna al-metālib fī beyānī mane al-tajāzub before him, with the aim of explaining the statements of Kuhistānī. al-Nāblusī saw this treatise by al-Hamawī and stated that he reached erroneous in some of his conclusions, and consequently he composed the aforementioned treatise as a refutation. Nāblusī, who criticized Hamawīs explanations, proceeded to re-explicate Kuhistānīs statements on the wujūb of ushr and khiyār al-shart in terms of the art of tajāzub and refuted Hamawīs six views on these issues, with the presentation of compelling evidence. Nāblusīs stands out with its rich use of sources, simple style and explanatory examples, and contains comprehensive information on the art of tajāzub. In this study, firstly, the concept of tajāzub is explained and the aforementioned treatise of Nāblusī is analysed in detail by comparing it with the treatise of Hamawī, which he refuted. At this point, firstly, the statement of Kuhistānī, which is the basis of the discussion, is given, then Hamawīs explanation on the subject is mentioned, and finally Nāblusīs refutation is given. In the last part of the study, the edited text of Nāblusīs treatise is given.

 Câhiliye döneminde şair ve hatipler tarafından bir meleke olarak kullanılan belagat, geçirdiği hazırlık ve gelişim döneminin ardından ilmî teşekkülünü tamamlayarak Arap dil ilimlerinde müstakil bir dal haline gelmiştir. Ebû Yakûb es-Sekkâkî öl. 6261229 öncülüğünde meânî-beyân-bedî olarak üç başlık altında ele alınmaya başlanan belagat konularının bedî kısmına, Sekkâkî sonrası şerh ve hâşiye dönemi müellifleri tarafından yeni sanatlar eklenmiştir. Bu sanatlardan birisi de tarif ve tesmiyesi Saduddîn et-Teftâzânîye öl. 7921390 ait olan tecâzüb sanatıdır. Farklı pek çok disiplinde ilmî ve edebî bir terim olarak yer alan bu sanatın etkin kullanım alanlarından birisi de fıkıh ilmidir. Fıkıh sahasında bu sanattan istifade eden âlimlerden birisi Şemsuddîn Muhammed el-Kuhistânîdir öl. 9621555. Kuhistânî Câmiur-rumûz adlı eserinde öşrün vücûbiyeti ve şart muhayyerliği konularını izah etmek üzere tecâzüb sanatına başvurmaktadır. Ne var ki Kuhistânînin kullandığı tecâzüb ifadesi ilim dünyasında anlaşılamayıp muğlak ifadeler olarak kalınca bu ifadelerden kastın ne olduğunu açıklayan bazı risâleler kaleme alınmıştır. Bunlardan birisi de Abdulganî en-Nâblusînin çalışmamıza esas olan en-Nesîmur-rebîî fit-tecâzübil-bedîî adlı risâlesidir. Nâblusînin bu risâleyi kaleme almasının ana nedeni, kendisinden önce Kuhistânîye ait ifadeleri açıklamak gayesiyle Esnel-metâlib fî beyâni manet-tecâzüb adında muhtasar bir risâle kaleme alan Seyyid Ahmed el-Hamevîye öl. 10981687 reddiye yapmaktır. Nâblusî, Hamevîye ait bu risâleyi görmüş ve onun tespitlerinden bazılarını hatalı bulduğunu belirterek reddiye mahiyetinde mezkûr risâlesini kaleme almıştır. Hamevînin açıklamalarına ciddi eleştiriler getiren Nâblusî, öşrün vücûbiyeti ve şart muhayyerliği hususlarındaki Kuhistânîye ait ifadeleri tecâzüb sanatı açısından yeniden açıklama yoluna gitmiş ve bu konularda Hamevîye ait toplamda altı görüşe deliller getirmek suretiyle reddiye yapmıştır. Nâblusînin bu risâlesi; zengin kaynak kullanımı, yalın ifade üslûbu ve açıklayıcı örneklerle öne çıkmakta, tecâzüb sanatına dair kapsamlı bilgiler ihtiva etmektedir. Bu araştırma ile ilk olarak tecâzüb kavramı Teftâzânî üzerinden açıklanmış; ardından Nâblusînin mezkûr risâlesi, reddiye yaptığı Hamevîye ait risâleyle mukabele edilmek suretiyle detaylı olarak analiz edilmiştir. Bu noktada ilk olarak tartışmaya esas olan Kuhistânîye ait ifade verilmiş, ardından Hamevînin konuya dair açıklaması zikredilmiş, son olarak da Nâblusînin reddiyesine yer verilmiştir. Çalışmanın son bölümünde ise Nâblusîye ait risâlenin tahkikli metni yer almaktadır.

Makale detayları

The Use of the Arts of al-Balāgha in Explanation of Fiqhī Issues: 'Abdulghanī al-Nāblusī's Work al-Nasīmu al-rebī'ī fī al-tajāzub al-badī'ī (An Analysis and A Critical Edition)

Yazarlar:

Muhammed Emin Görgün

Yayıncı:

Sivas Cumhuriyet University

Ana Başlıklar:

Arap Dili ve Belagatı | İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi Vol.28 Issue 2, pp.890-912

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001333367

pISSN:

2528-9861

Arabic Language and Rhetoric (Balāgha)

Fiqh

Tajāzub

Kuhistānī

Sayyid Ahmad al-HamawīArap Dili ve Belagati

Fıkıh

Tecâzüb

Kuhistânî

Seyyid Ahmed el-Hamevî

‘Abdulganî en-Nâblusî

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Muhammed Emin Görgün

Yayıncı: Sivas Cumhuriyet University

Ana Başlıklar: Arap Dili ve Belagatı | İslam Hukuku

Dergi: Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi Vol.28 Issue 2, pp.890-912

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 12/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001333367

pISSN: 2528-9861

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Muhammed Emin Görgün

Yayıncı:

Sivas Cumhuriyet University

Ana Başlıklar:

Arap Dili ve Belagatı | İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi Vol.28 Issue 2, pp.890-912

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001333367

pISSN:

2528-9861