THE COMPARISON OF JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY OF TÜRKİYE AND SELECTED COUNTRIES WITH DEA

Cevriye Yüksel Yıldırım

Makale detayları

THE COMPARISON OF JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY OF TÜRKİYE AND SELECTED COUNTRIES WITH DEA

Yazarlar:

Cevriye Yüksel Yıldırım

Yayıncı:

Pamukkale University

Ana Başlıklar:

Bütçe ve Mali Planlama | Mali Hukuk

Dergi:

Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Issue 67, pp.53-81

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

10/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001341960

pISSN:

1308-2922

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 While the concept of justice has been a concept that has been given importance since the existence of humanity, its importance has increased even more as a result of people living in communities. As a result of living in a community, the phenomenon of the state emerged, and the state order began to form. With the formation of state order, ensuring justice has become the basic duty of states. Services such as justice, health, defence, security and education services produced to meet the needs of the society are public services. Public goods are goods that are not produced in the market and have the feature of non-excludability. In other words, everyone in the society where a good is produced can use that good without bearing the cost of the good. It is not possible to exclude those who want to benefit from education, health and security services, which are non-excludable goods and services, for free. Due to this feature of public goods, the amount that consumers will pay for public goods is unknown. This situation leads to public goods not being produced at ideal levels in the market or not being produced at all. For this reason, the state itself takes part in the production of public goods instead of private enterprises. In this sense, states have to realize the production and delivery of public services. Justice services constitute one of the public goods and services. In order to ensure justice, legal rules and institutions or units that will implement these rules are needed. In evaluating the performance of these institutions, variables related to justice services such as budgetary figures, number of personnel, number of cases and hearing times of cases are used. In this study, the activities of Türkiye and 18 countries that are EU members or whose data we have permanent access to, were compared in terms of judicial services, which are among the justice services. In this context, Data Envelopment Analysis DEA was applied with a data set consisting of 9 input and 4 output variables for 19 countries for the years 2016, 2018 and 2020. In all 4 models created based on input and output variables for DEA, it was concluded that Bosnia and Herzegovina and Romania were effective for 2016, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Austria, Latvia and Romania were effective for 2018, and Czechia, Hungary, Ireland and Latvia were effective for 2020. According to the DEA results for the years 2016, 2018 and 2020, it was concluded that Türkiye was effective in Model 3 and Model 4 for three years.

 While the concept of justice has been a concept that has been given importance since the existence of humanity, its importance has increased even more as a result of people living in communities. As a result of living in a community, the phenomenon of the state emerged, and the state order began to form. With the formation of state order, ensuring justice has become the basic duty of states. Services such as justice, health, defence, security and education services produced to meet the needs of the society are public services. Public goods are goods that are not produced in the market and have the feature of non-excludability. In other words, everyone in the society where a good is produced can use that good without bearing the cost of the good. It is not possible to exclude those who want to benefit from education, health and security services, which are non-excludable goods and services, for free. Due to this feature of public goods, the amount that consumers will pay for public goods is unknown. This situation leads to public goods not being produced at ideal levels in the market or not being produced at all. For this reason, the state itself takes part in the production of public goods instead of private enterprises. In this sense, states have to realize the production and delivery of public services. Justice services constitute one of the public goods and services. In order to ensure justice, legal rules and institutions or units that will implement these rules are needed. In evaluating the performance of these institutions, variables related to justice services such as budgetary figures, number of personnel, number of cases and hearing times of cases are used. In this study, the activities of Türkiye and 18 countries that are EU members or whose data we have permanent access to, were compared in terms of judicial services, which are among the justice services. In this context, Data Envelopment Analysis DEA was applied with a data set consisting of 9 input and 4 output variables for 19 countries for the years 2016, 2018 and 2020. In all 4 models created based on input and output variables for DEA, it was concluded that Bosnia and Herzegovina and Romania were effective for 2016, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Austria, Latvia and Romania were effective for 2018, and Czechia, Hungary, Ireland and Latvia were effective for 2020. According to the DEA results for the years 2016, 2018 and 2020, it was concluded that Türkiye was effective in Model 3 and Model 4 for three years.

 While the concept of justice has been a concept that has been given importance since the existence of humanity, its importance has increased even more as a result of people living in communities. As a result of living in a community, the phenomenon of the state emerged, and the state order began to form. With the formation of state order, ensuring justice has become the basic duty of states. Services such as justice, health, defence, security and education services produced to meet the needs of the society are public services. Public goods are goods that are not produced in the market and have the feature of non-excludability. In other words, everyone in the society where a good is produced can use that good without bearing the cost of the good. It is not possible to exclude those who want to benefit from education, health and security services, which are non-excludable goods and services, for free. Due to this feature of public goods, the amount that consumers will pay for public goods is unknown. This situation leads to public goods not being produced at ideal levels in the market or not being produced at all. For this reason, the state itself takes part in the production of public goods instead of private enterprises. In this sense, states have to realize the production and delivery of public services. Justice services constitute one of the public goods and services. In order to ensure justice, legal rules and institutions or units that will implement these rules are needed. In evaluating the performance of these institutions, variables related to justice services such as budgetary figures, number of personnel, number of cases and hearing times of cases are used. In this study, the activities of Türkiye and 18 countries that are EU members or whose data we have permanent access to, were compared in terms of judicial services, which are among the justice services. In this context, Data Envelopment Analysis DEA was applied with a data set consisting of 9 input and 4 output variables for 19 countries for the years 2016, 2018 and 2020. In all 4 models created based on input and output variables for DEA, it was concluded that Bosnia and Herzegovina and Romania were effective for 2016, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Austria, Latvia and Romania were effective for 2018, and Czechia, Hungary, Ireland and Latvia were effective for 2020. According to the DEA results for the years 2016, 2018 and 2020, it was concluded that Türkiye was effective in Model 3 and Model 4 for three years.

 İnsanlığın varoluşundan bu yana adalet kavramı, önem atfedilen bir kavram iken özellikle insanların topluluk halinde yaşamalarının bir sonucu olarak önemi daha da artmıştır. Topluluk halinde yaşamanın bir sonucu olarak devlet olgusu ortaya çıkmış ve devlet düzeni oluşmaya başlamıştır. Devlet düzeninin oluşması ile adaleti sağlamak devletlerin temel görevi haline gelmiştir. Toplumun ihtiyaçlarını gidermek amacıyla üretilen adalet, sağlık, savunma, güvenlik, eğitim hizmetleri gibi hizmetler ise kamu hizmetleridir. Kamusal mallar piyasada üretilmeyen ve dışlanamazlık özelliğine sahip olan mallardır. Yani bir mal üretildiği toplumda olan herkes malın maliyetine katlanmaksızın o malı kullanabilmektedir. Dışlanamazlık özelliğinin olduğu mal ve hizmetlerden olan eğitim, sağlık ve güvenlik hizmetlerinden bedava yararlanmak isteyenleri dışlamak mümkün olmamaktadır. Kamusal malların bu özelliğinden dolayı tüketicilerin kamusal mallara ödeyecekleri miktar bilinmemektedir. Bu durum ise kamusal malların piyasada ideal seviyelerde üretilmemesine ya da hiç üretilmemesini yol açmaktadır. Bu nedenle devlet kamusal malların üretiminde özel teşebbüsler yerine kendisi bizzat üretimde yer almaktadır. Bu anlamda devletler kamu hizmeti üretimi ve sunumunu gerçekleştirmek zorundadır. Kamusal mal ve hizmetlerden birini de adalet hizmetleri oluşturmaktadır. Adaletin sağlanmasında hukuk kurallarına ve bu kuralları uygulayacak kurum ya da birimlere ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Bu kurumların performanslarının değerlendirilmesinde bütçesel rakamlar, personel sayıları, dava sayıları ve davaların görülme süreleri gibi adalet hizmetlerine yönelik değişkenlerden yararlanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada Türkiye ile AB üyesi olan veya verisine sürekli erişim sağlayabildiğimiz 18 ülkenin adalet hizmetlerinden olan yargı hizmetlerindeki etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılması yapılmıştır. Bu bağlamda 19 ülkenin 2016, 2018 ve 2020 yılları için 9 adet girdi ve 4 adet çıktı değişkenlerinden oluşturan veri seti ile Veri Zarflama Analizi VZA uygulanmıştır. VZA için girdi ve çıktı değişkenlerine bağlı oluşturulan 4 modelin tamamında 2016 yılı için Bosna Hersek ve Romanya, 2018 yılı için Bosna Hersek, Avusturya, Letonya ve Romanya, 2020 yılı için Çekya, Macaristan, İrlanda ve Letonyanın etkin olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Türkiyenin 2016, 2018 ve 2020 yılları için yapılan VZA sonuçlarına göre üç yıl için Model 3 ve Model 4te etkin olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Makale detayları

THE COMPARISON OF JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY OF TÜRKİYE AND SELECTED COUNTRIES WITH DEA

Yazarlar:

Cevriye Yüksel Yıldırım

Yayıncı:

Pamukkale University

Ana Başlıklar:

Bütçe ve Mali Planlama | Mali Hukuk

Dergi:

Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Issue 67, pp.53-81

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

10/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001341960

pISSN:

1308-2922

Justice

Justice Services

Efficiency

Judicial Efficiency

DEAAdalet

Adalet Hizmetleri

Etkinlik

Yargı Etkinliği

VZA.

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Cevriye Yüksel Yıldırım

Yayıncı: Pamukkale University

Ana Başlıklar: Bütçe ve Mali Planlama | Mali Hukuk

Dergi: Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Issue 67, pp.53-81

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 10/2025

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001341960

pISSN: 1308-2922

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Cevriye Yüksel Yıldırım

Yayıncı:

Pamukkale University

Ana Başlıklar:

Bütçe ve Mali Planlama | Mali Hukuk

Dergi:

Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Issue 67, pp.53-81

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

10/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001341960

pISSN:

1308-2922