AN EVALUATION OF G20 COUNTRIES BY THE DIGITAL DIPLOMACY INDEX FROM MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING PERSPECTIVE

Nuh Keleş; Fatma Sönmez Çakır

Makale detayları

AN EVALUATION OF G20 COUNTRIES BY THE DIGITAL DIPLOMACY INDEX FROM MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING PERSPECTIVE

Yazarlar:

Nuh Keleş | Fatma Sönmez Çakır

Yayıncı:

Anadolu University

Ana Başlıklar:

Operations Research | Business Administration

Dergi:

Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.25 Issue 1, pp.242-274

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

3/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001313977

pISSN:

2687-184X

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Today, there has been a shift from classical communication tools to communicating in the digitalinternet environment with the advancement and continuous development of technology. This study aims to reveal the development of digital diplomacy according to the activities of governmentscountries formed by individuals in the digital environment. Digital diplomacy criteria weights were determined according to the average level weights revealed from six different approaches derived from four different methods CRITIC, LOPCOW, CVM, SD. Among the digital diplomacy index criteria, format proficiency-14.12, which is more important than the others, is in the first rank, followed by diplomatic centrality-12.27, and less important global country visibility-9,58 is in the last rank. The countries in the G20 group were evaluated on the basis of different rankings with the ELECTRE I method, which allows comparisons according to the pairwise superiorities of the alternatives. For comparisons used PROMETHEE II, MEREC, MEREC-G, Entropy, Entropy-Corr, and MEREC-Corr methods. India ranked first, USA ranked second, France third, and Russia fourth in the evaluation made with the ELECTRE I method using the criteria weights obtained at the average level. It can be recommended that countries increase their visual or video activities and diplomatic network followers to stand out in digital diplomacy. It is thought that significant contributions have been made to the literature with the variety and innovations of the weight-determination methods used in the study.

 Today, there has been a shift from classical communication tools to communicating in the digitalinternet environment with the advancement and continuous development of technology. This study aims to reveal the development of digital diplomacy according to the activities of governmentscountries formed by individuals in the digital environment. Digital diplomacy criteria weights were determined according to the average level weights revealed from six different approaches derived from four different methods CRITIC, LOPCOW, CVM, SD. Among the digital diplomacy index criteria, format proficiency-14.12, which is more important than the others, is in the first rank, followed by diplomatic centrality-12.27, and less important global country visibility-9,58 is in the last rank. The countries in the G20 group were evaluated on the basis of different rankings with the ELECTRE I method, which allows comparisons according to the pairwise superiorities of the alternatives. For comparisons used PROMETHEE II, MEREC, MEREC-G, Entropy, Entropy-Corr, and MEREC-Corr methods. India ranked first, USA ranked second, France third, and Russia fourth in the evaluation made with the ELECTRE I method using the criteria weights obtained at the average level. It can be recommended that countries increase their visual or video activities and diplomatic network followers to stand out in digital diplomacy. It is thought that significant contributions have been made to the literature with the variety and innovations of the weight-determination methods used in the study.

 Today, there has been a shift from classical communication tools to communicating in the digitalinternet environment with the advancement and continuous development of technology. This study aims to reveal the development of digital diplomacy according to the activities of governmentscountries formed by individuals in the digital environment. Digital diplomacy criteria weights were determined according to the average level weights revealed from six different approaches derived from four different methods CRITIC, LOPCOW, CVM, SD. Among the digital diplomacy index criteria, format proficiency-14.12, which is more important than the others, is in the first rank, followed by diplomatic centrality-12.27, and less important global country visibility-9,58 is in the last rank. The countries in the G20 group were evaluated on the basis of different rankings with the ELECTRE I method, which allows comparisons according to the pairwise superiorities of the alternatives. For comparisons used PROMETHEE II, MEREC, MEREC-G, Entropy, Entropy-Corr, and MEREC-Corr methods. India ranked first, USA ranked second, France third, and Russia fourth in the evaluation made with the ELECTRE I method using the criteria weights obtained at the average level. It can be recommended that countries increase their visual or video activities and diplomatic network followers to stand out in digital diplomacy. It is thought that significant contributions have been made to the literature with the variety and innovations of the weight-determination methods used in the study.

 Günümüzde teknolojinin ilerlemesi ve sürekli geliştirilmesiyle birlikte klasik haberleşme araçlarından dijitalinternet ortamındaki iletişime doğru bir kayma olmuştur. Bu çalışma bireylerin oluşturduğu hükümetlerinülkelerin dijital ortamdaki etkinliklerine göre dijital diplomasi gelişmişliklerini ortaya çıkartmayı amaçlamaktadır. Dijital diplomasi göstergelerine ait ağırlıklar dört farklı yöntemden CRITIC, LOPCOW, CVM, SD türetilen altı farklı yaklaşımdan ortaya konulan ortalama düzeyde ağırlıklara göre belirlenmiştir. Dijital diplomasi indeksi kriterlerinden diğerlerine göre daha önemli olan biçim yeterliliği-14,12 ilk sırada, ardından diplomatik merkezilik-12,27 ikinci sırada ve daha az önemli olan küresel görünürlüğü-9,58 son sırada bulunmuştur. Alternatiflerin ikili üstünlüklerine göre karşılaştırma yapmaya imkân sağlayan ELECTRE I yöntemiyle farklı sıralamalar temelinde G20 grubundaki ülkeler değerlendirilmiştir. Karşılaştırmalar için PROMETHEE II, MEREC, MEREC-G, Entropy, Entropy-Corr ve MEREC-Corr yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Ortalama düzeyde elde edilen kriter ağırlıkları kullanılarak ELECTRE I yöntemiyle yapılan değerlendirmede Hindistan ilk sırada, ABD ikinci, Fransa üçüncü ve Rusya dördüncü sırada yer almıştır. Ülkelerin dijital diplomaside öne çıkmak için görsel veya video içeren etkinliklerini ve diplomatik ağ takipçilerini artırması tavsiye edilebilir. Çalışmada kullanılan ağırlık belirleme yöntemlerinin çeşitliliği ve yenilikleriyle literatüre önemli katkılarda bulunulduğu düşünülmektedir.

Makale detayları

AN EVALUATION OF G20 COUNTRIES BY THE DIGITAL DIPLOMACY INDEX FROM MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING PERSPECTIVE

Yazarlar:

Nuh Keleş | Fatma Sönmez Çakır

Yayıncı:

Anadolu University

Ana Başlıklar:

Operations Research | Business Administration

Dergi:

Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.25 Issue 1, pp.242-274

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

3/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001313977

pISSN:

2687-184X

Digital Diplomacy Index

ELECTRE

CRITIC

LOPCOW

CVMDijital Diplomasi İndeksi

ELECTRE

CRITIC

LOPCOW

CVM

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Nuh Keleş | Fatma Sönmez Çakır

Yayıncı: Anadolu University

Ana Başlıklar: Operations Research | Business Administration

Dergi: Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.25 Issue 1, pp.242-274

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 3/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001313977

pISSN: 2687-184X

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Nuh Keleş | Fatma Sönmez Çakır

Yayıncı:

Anadolu University

Ana Başlıklar:

Operations Research | Business Administration

Dergi:

Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.25 Issue 1, pp.242-274

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

3/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001313977

pISSN:

2687-184X