Does Smart Phone Usage in Young Adults Have an Effect on Static and Dynamic Balance?

Kadirhan Özdemir; Batuhan Dönmez; Melih Zeren; Nilay Yürekdeler Şahin; Eshan Karakurum; Rumeysa Eroğlu

Makale detayları

Does Smart Phone Usage in Young Adults Have an Effect on Static and Dynamic Balance?

Yazarlar:

Kadirhan Özdemir | Batuhan Dönmez | Melih Zeren | Nilay Yürekdeler Şahin | Eshan Karakurum | Rumeysa Eroğlu

Yayıncı:

Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar:

Fizyoterapi

Dergi:

Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.11 Issue 3, pp.746-757

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001326978

pISSN:

2528-9918

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effects of talking and note-taking on a smartphone on static and dynamic balance. Materials and Methods: In the study, healthy young adults n36 were asked to maintain postural balance while standing on static and dynamic platforms in different tasks: Task I without using a smartphone, Task II while taking notes on a smartphone, and Task III while talking on a smartphone. Center of pressure CoP on mediolateral CoPx and anteroposterior CoPy, CoP path length, CoParea, and trunk deviation length were used to measure static and dynamic postural balance. Results: On a static platform, CoPy and CoParea were different between the tasks p0.001, p0.017. Task II and Task III impaired CoPy more than the task I p0.001, p0.004. Task III affected CoParea more negatively than task II p0.027. CoP path length was lower in task II and task III p0.001. CoP path length was significantly higher in task III compared to task II p0.001. On a dynamic platform, there were differences in CoPy between the tasks p0.038. There was a difference in CoPy between task II and task III p0.005. The CoParea was significantly different between the tasks p0.023. CoParea and CoP path length was higher in task II compared to task I p0.035, p0.001. Conclusion: The study showed that smartphone use during specific tasks, including talking andor note-taking on a smartphone, could increase the risk of falls and accidents by affecting center of pressure and postural sway.

 Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effects of talking and note-taking on a smartphone on static and dynamic balance. Materials and Methods: In the study, healthy young adults n36 were asked to maintain postural balance while standing on static and dynamic platforms in different tasks: Task I without using a smartphone, Task II while taking notes on a smartphone, and Task III while talking on a smartphone. Center of pressure CoP on mediolateral CoPx and anteroposterior CoPy, CoP path length, CoParea, and trunk deviation length were used to measure static and dynamic postural balance. Results: On a static platform, CoPy and CoParea were different between the tasks p0.001, p0.017. Task II and Task III impaired CoPy more than the task I p0.001, p0.004. Task III affected CoParea more negatively than task II p0.027. CoP path length was lower in task II and task III p0.001. CoP path length was significantly higher in task III compared to task II p0.001. On a dynamic platform, there were differences in CoPy between the tasks p0.038. There was a difference in CoPy between task II and task III p0.005. The CoParea was significantly different between the tasks p0.023. CoParea and CoP path length was higher in task II compared to task I p0.035, p0.001. Conclusion: The study showed that smartphone use during specific tasks, including talking andor note-taking on a smartphone, could increase the risk of falls and accidents by affecting center of pressure and postural sway.

 Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effects of talking and note-taking on a smartphone on static and dynamic balance. Materials and Methods: In the study, healthy young adults n36 were asked to maintain postural balance while standing on static and dynamic platforms in different tasks: Task I without using a smartphone, Task II while taking notes on a smartphone, and Task III while talking on a smartphone. Center of pressure CoP on mediolateral CoPx and anteroposterior CoPy, CoP path length, CoParea, and trunk deviation length were used to measure static and dynamic postural balance. Results: On a static platform, CoPy and CoParea were different between the tasks p0.001, p0.017. Task II and Task III impaired CoPy more than the task I p0.001, p0.004. Task III affected CoParea more negatively than task II p0.027. CoP path length was lower in task II and task III p0.001. CoP path length was significantly higher in task III compared to task II p0.001. On a dynamic platform, there were differences in CoPy between the tasks p0.038. There was a difference in CoPy between task II and task III p0.005. The CoParea was significantly different between the tasks p0.023. CoParea and CoP path length was higher in task II compared to task I p0.035, p0.001. Conclusion: The study showed that smartphone use during specific tasks, including talking andor note-taking on a smartphone, could increase the risk of falls and accidents by affecting center of pressure and postural sway.

 Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effects of talking and note-taking on a smartphone on static and dynamic balance. Materials and Methods: In the study, healthy young adults n36 were asked to maintain postural balance while standing on static and dynamic platforms in different tasks: Task I without using a smartphone, Task II while taking notes on a smartphone, and Task III while talking on a smartphone. Center of pressure CoP on mediolateral CoPx and anteroposterior CoPy, CoP path length, CoParea, and trunk deviation length were used to measure static and dynamic postural balance. Results: On a static platform, CoPy and CoParea were different between the tasks p0.001, p0.017. Task II and Task III impaired CoPy more than the task I p0.001, p0.004. Task III affected CoParea more negatively than task II p0.027. CoP path length was lower in task II and task III p0.001. CoP path length was significantly higher in task III compared to task II p0.001. On a dynamic platform, there were differences in CoPy between the tasks p0.038. There was a difference in CoPy between task II and task III p0.005. The CoParea was significantly different between the tasks p0.023. CoParea and CoP path length was higher in task II compared to task I p0.035, p0.001. Conclusion: The study showed that smartphone use during specific tasks, including talking andor note-taking on a smartphone, could increase the risk of falls and accidents by affecting center of pressure and postural sway.

Makale detayları

Does Smart Phone Usage in Young Adults Have an Effect on Static and Dynamic Balance?

Yazarlar:

Kadirhan Özdemir | Batuhan Dönmez | Melih Zeren | Nilay Yürekdeler Şahin | Eshan Karakurum | Rumeysa Eroğlu

Yayıncı:

Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar:

Fizyoterapi

Dergi:

Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.11 Issue 3, pp.746-757

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001326978

pISSN:

2528-9918

smartphone

dynamic balance

static balance

dual task

Sayı

Makale detayları

Does Smart Phone Usage in Young Adults Have an Effect on Static and Dynamic Balance?

Yazarlar: Kadirhan Özdemir | Batuhan Dönmez | Melih Zeren | Nilay Yürekdeler Şahin | Eshan Karakurum | Rumeysa Eroğlu

Yayıncı: Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar: Fizyoterapi

Dergi: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.11 Issue 3, pp.746-757

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 12/2024

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001326978

pISSN: 2528-9918

smartphone

dynamic balance

static balance

dual task

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Kadirhan Özdemir | Batuhan Dönmez | Melih Zeren | Nilay Yürekdeler Şahin | Eshan Karakurum | Rumeysa Eroğlu

Yayıncı:

Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar:

Fizyoterapi

Dergi:

Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.11 Issue 3, pp.746-757

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001326978

pISSN:

2528-9918