Investigation of Superstructure Performance Based on the Fixed Base Foundation, Winkler, and Pseudo-Coupled Methods

Ali Serdar Ecemiş; Yavuz Yenginar; İlyas Özkan

Makale detayları

Investigation of Superstructure Performance Based on the Fixed Base Foundation, Winkler, and Pseudo-Coupled Methods

Yazarlar:

Ali Serdar Ecemiş | Yavuz Yenginar | İlyas Özkan

Yayıncı:

Necmettin Erbakan University

Ana Başlıklar:

Betonarme Yapılar | Deprem Mühendisliği | İnşaat Geoteknik Mühendisliği | Yapı Mühendisliği

Dergi:

Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi Vol.7 Issue 2, pp.259-272

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001356328

pISSN:

2667-7989

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 In the present study, the performance of 5-story building resting on medium dense sandy soil was analyzed by fixed-base, Winkler and Pseudo-coupled methods. The period of structure, axial loads and shear forces acting on columns, earthquake forces, story displacements, foundation base pressure and settlement values were determined in static and dynamic loading cases. The choice of foundation solution method in structural engineering profoundly influences the dynamic and static behavior of buildings under various loading conditions. Comparing Winkler and Pseudo-coupled methods to the fixed-base foundation, several key differences emerge: building periods are closer together in Winkler and Pseudo-coupled methods, with fixed-base periods being 6.7 longer. Axial loads on columns under gravity plus live load GQ are minimally affected by the foundation method, but under earthquake EQx loading, Winkler and Pseudo-coupled methods significantly reduce axial loads on 1st and 5th floor columns compared to the fixed-base method. Shear forces on corner columns are 46 lower with Winkler and Pseudo-coupled methods. Moreover, these methods result in a 7 increase in earthquake force and 4.7 less story displacement than the fixed-base method. Additionally, the location of maximum base pressure, settlement, and differential settlement varies depending on the foundation analysis method employed. These findings emphasize the critical role of foundation selection in optimizing structural stability, performance, and resilience under different loading scenarios, particularly seismic events.

 In the present study, the performance of 5-story building resting on medium dense sandy soil was analyzed by fixed-base, Winkler and Pseudo-coupled methods. The period of structure, axial loads and shear forces acting on columns, earthquake forces, story displacements, foundation base pressure and settlement values were determined in static and dynamic loading cases. The choice of foundation solution method in structural engineering profoundly influences the dynamic and static behavior of buildings under various loading conditions. Comparing Winkler and Pseudo-coupled methods to the fixed-base foundation, several key differences emerge: building periods are closer together in Winkler and Pseudo-coupled methods, with fixed-base periods being 6.7 longer. Axial loads on columns under gravity plus live load GQ are minimally affected by the foundation method, but under earthquake EQx loading, Winkler and Pseudo-coupled methods significantly reduce axial loads on 1st and 5th floor columns compared to the fixed-base method. Shear forces on corner columns are 46 lower with Winkler and Pseudo-coupled methods. Moreover, these methods result in a 7 increase in earthquake force and 4.7 less story displacement than the fixed-base method. Additionally, the location of maximum base pressure, settlement, and differential settlement varies depending on the foundation analysis method employed. These findings emphasize the critical role of foundation selection in optimizing structural stability, performance, and resilience under different loading scenarios, particularly seismic events.

 In the present study, the performance of 5-story building resting on medium dense sandy soil was analyzed by fixed-base, Winkler and Pseudo-coupled methods. The period of structure, axial loads and shear forces acting on columns, earthquake forces, story displacements, foundation base pressure and settlement values were determined in static and dynamic loading cases. The choice of foundation solution method in structural engineering profoundly influences the dynamic and static behavior of buildings under various loading conditions. Comparing Winkler and Pseudo-coupled methods to the fixed-base foundation, several key differences emerge: building periods are closer together in Winkler and Pseudo-coupled methods, with fixed-base periods being 6.7 longer. Axial loads on columns under gravity plus live load GQ are minimally affected by the foundation method, but under earthquake EQx loading, Winkler and Pseudo-coupled methods significantly reduce axial loads on 1st and 5th floor columns compared to the fixed-base method. Shear forces on corner columns are 46 lower with Winkler and Pseudo-coupled methods. Moreover, these methods result in a 7 increase in earthquake force and 4.7 less story displacement than the fixed-base method. Additionally, the location of maximum base pressure, settlement, and differential settlement varies depending on the foundation analysis method employed. These findings emphasize the critical role of foundation selection in optimizing structural stability, performance, and resilience under different loading scenarios, particularly seismic events.

 Bu çalışmada, orta sıkı kumlu zemin üzerine oturan 5 katlı bir binanın performansı ankastre temel, Winkler ve Pseudo-eşlenik yöntemleriyle analiz edilmiştir. Yapının periyodu, kolonlara etki eden eksenel yükler ve kesme kuvvetleri, deprem kuvvetleri, kat yer değiştirmeleri, temel taban basıncı ve yer değiştirme değerleri statik ve dinamik yükleme durumlarında belirlenmiştir. Yapısal mühendislikte kullanılan temel çözüm yöntemi, çeşitli yükleme koşullarında binaların dinamik ve statik davranışlarını derinden etkilemektedir. Winkler ve Pseudo-eşlenik yöntemlerinin ankastre temele göre karşılaştırılmasıyla, birkaç önemli fark ortaya çıkmıştır: Winkler ve Pseudo-eşlenik yöntemlerinde bina periyotları birbirine yakın iken ankastre temel çözümünde periyot 6,7 daha fazla olmaktadır. Ölü ve hareketli yük GQ altında kolonlara etki eden eksenel yükler temel analiz yönteminden oldukça az etkilenmektedir, ancak deprem EQx yükü altında Winkler ve Pseudo-eşlenik yöntemleri, ankastre temel yöntemine göre 1. ve 5. kat kolonlarındaki eksenel yükleri önemli ölçüde azalmaktadır. Köşe kolonlarındaki kesme kuvvetleri Winkler ve Pseudo-eşlenik yöntemlerinde 46 daha düşük elde edilmiştir. Ayrıca, bu yöntemler deprem kuvvetinde 7 artış ve ankastre temel yöntemine göre 4,7 daha az kat yer değiştirmesi sonucunu vermiştir. Maksimum temel basıncı, oturma ve farklı oturmanın konumu, kullanılan temel analiz yöntemine bağlı olarak değişmektedir. Bu bulgular, özellikle deprem olayları gibi farklı yükleme senaryoları altında yapısal stabilite, performans ve dayanıklılığın optimize edilmesinde temel seçiminin kritik rolünü vurgulamaktadır.

Makale detayları

Investigation of Superstructure Performance Based on the Fixed Base Foundation, Winkler, and Pseudo-Coupled Methods

Yazarlar:

Ali Serdar Ecemiş | Yavuz Yenginar | İlyas Özkan

Yayıncı:

Necmettin Erbakan University

Ana Başlıklar:

Betonarme Yapılar | Deprem Mühendisliği | İnşaat Geoteknik Mühendisliği | Yapı Mühendisliği

Dergi:

Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi Vol.7 Issue 2, pp.259-272

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001356328

pISSN:

2667-7989

Earthquake

Fixed-base foundation

Pseudo-coupled method

Soil-structure interaction Winkler method

Winkler methodAnkastre temel

Deprem

Psodo-eşlenik yöntem

Winkler yöntemi

Yapı-zemin etkileşimi

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Ali Serdar Ecemiş | Yavuz Yenginar | İlyas Özkan

Yayıncı: Necmettin Erbakan University

Ana Başlıklar: Betonarme Yapılar | Deprem Mühendisliği | İnşaat Geoteknik Mühendisliği | Yapı Mühendisliği

Dergi: Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi Vol.7 Issue 2, pp.259-272

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 8/2025

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001356328

pISSN: 2667-7989

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Ali Serdar Ecemiş | Yavuz Yenginar | İlyas Özkan

Yayıncı:

Necmettin Erbakan University

Ana Başlıklar:

Betonarme Yapılar | Deprem Mühendisliği | İnşaat Geoteknik Mühendisliği | Yapı Mühendisliği

Dergi:

Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi Vol.7 Issue 2, pp.259-272

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001356328

pISSN:

2667-7989