Students of Faculty of Sports Sciences and Faculty of Education Coping with Stress and Students' Resilience Levels Examination of Detection Methods

İhsan Yağcı; Cuneyt Seydioğlu; Engin Çinibulak

Makale detayları

Students of Faculty of Sports Sciences and Faculty of Education Coping with Stress and Students' Resilience Levels Examination of Detection Methods

Yazarlar:

İhsan Yağcı | Cuneyt Seydioğlu | Engin Çinibulak

Yayıncı:

Kafkas University

Ana Başlıklar:

Spor Faaliyetleri Yönetimi

Dergi:

Kafkas Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi Vol.3 Issue 3, pp.161-182

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

10/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001298749

pISSN:

2791-8459

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Purpose: The purpose of this research is to determine the psychological resilience and stress coping styles of students at Kocaeli University Faculty of Sports Sciences and Faculty of Education and to examine the relationships between the two variables. Method: The population of the study consists of 2798 students studying at Kocaeli University Faculty of Sport Sciences and Kocaeli University Faculty of Education. The sample group consisted of 400 students from the Faculty of Sport Sciences and the Faculty of Education who voluntarily participated in the 2022-2023 academic year. In order to obtain data in the study, the Psychological Resilience Scale for Adults developed by Friborg et al., 2003 and adapted into Turkish by H. Nejat Basım and Fatih Çetin in 2011 and the Stress Coping Styles Scale developed by Lazarus and Folkman 1980 and adapted into Turkish by Şahin and Durak 1995 were used to examine students coping styles with stress. In the analysis of the data, frequency analysis was used to examine the personal information distribution of the participants, and skewness-kurtosis values were used to determine whether the data showed normal distribution. Anova, Tukey, Post-Hoc tests were performed to determine the differences between variables. Correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship. Results: As a result of the analysis; A high level of positive correlation was found in Psychological Resilience Total and Stress Coping Styles Total values in adults. Considering the gender of the students, while there was no significant difference in the total values of Psychological Resilience Levels and Coping with Stress Styles Total, there was a significant difference in the total values of Psychological Resilience Levels Total and Coping with Stress Styles Total on the Faculty Variable. There was no significant difference in the Total and Stress Coping Styles Total Values of the Students Psychological Resilience Levels according to the Doing Sports Variable. As a result of the tests, a significant difference was found between the ages of 18-21 and 25-27 in the Social Competence sub-dimension of the Psychological Resilience Scale in the Psychological Resilience Levels and Stress Coping Styles values in the Age Variable p0.05, while the Total value of the Stress Coping Styles Scale was 18. -There was a significant difference between the ages of 21 and 22-24. In the Optimistic Approach sub-dimension of the Stress Coping Styles Scale, there was a significant difference between the ages of 18-21 - 22-24 and 18-21 - 25-27.

 Purpose: The purpose of this research is to determine the psychological resilience and stress coping styles of students at Kocaeli University Faculty of Sports Sciences and Faculty of Education and to examine the relationships between the two variables. Method: The population of the study consists of 2798 students studying at Kocaeli University Faculty of Sport Sciences and Kocaeli University Faculty of Education. The sample group consisted of 400 students from the Faculty of Sport Sciences and the Faculty of Education who voluntarily participated in the 2022-2023 academic year. In order to obtain data in the study, the Psychological Resilience Scale for Adults developed by Friborg et al., 2003 and adapted into Turkish by H. Nejat Basım and Fatih Çetin in 2011 and the Stress Coping Styles Scale developed by Lazarus and Folkman 1980 and adapted into Turkish by Şahin and Durak 1995 were used to examine students coping styles with stress. In the analysis of the data, frequency analysis was used to examine the personal information distribution of the participants, and skewness-kurtosis values were used to determine whether the data showed normal distribution. Anova, Tukey, Post-Hoc tests were performed to determine the differences between variables. Correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship. Results: As a result of the analysis; A high level of positive correlation was found in Psychological Resilience Total and Stress Coping Styles Total values in adults. Considering the gender of the students, while there was no significant difference in the total values of Psychological Resilience Levels and Coping with Stress Styles Total, there was a significant difference in the total values of Psychological Resilience Levels Total and Coping with Stress Styles Total on the Faculty Variable. There was no significant difference in the Total and Stress Coping Styles Total Values of the Students Psychological Resilience Levels according to the Doing Sports Variable. As a result of the tests, a significant difference was found between the ages of 18-21 and 25-27 in the Social Competence sub-dimension of the Psychological Resilience Scale in the Psychological Resilience Levels and Stress Coping Styles values in the Age Variable p0.05, while the Total value of the Stress Coping Styles Scale was 18. -There was a significant difference between the ages of 21 and 22-24. In the Optimistic Approach sub-dimension of the Stress Coping Styles Scale, there was a significant difference between the ages of 18-21 - 22-24 and 18-21 - 25-27.

 Purpose: The purpose of this research is to determine the psychological resilience and stress coping styles of students at Kocaeli University Faculty of Sports Sciences and Faculty of Education and to examine the relationships between the two variables. Method: The population of the study consists of 2798 students studying at Kocaeli University Faculty of Sport Sciences and Kocaeli University Faculty of Education. The sample group consisted of 400 students from the Faculty of Sport Sciences and the Faculty of Education who voluntarily participated in the 2022-2023 academic year. In order to obtain data in the study, the Psychological Resilience Scale for Adults developed by Friborg et al., 2003 and adapted into Turkish by H. Nejat Basım and Fatih Çetin in 2011 and the Stress Coping Styles Scale developed by Lazarus and Folkman 1980 and adapted into Turkish by Şahin and Durak 1995 were used to examine students coping styles with stress. In the analysis of the data, frequency analysis was used to examine the personal information distribution of the participants, and skewness-kurtosis values were used to determine whether the data showed normal distribution. Anova, Tukey, Post-Hoc tests were performed to determine the differences between variables. Correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship. Results: As a result of the analysis; A high level of positive correlation was found in Psychological Resilience Total and Stress Coping Styles Total values in adults. Considering the gender of the students, while there was no significant difference in the total values of Psychological Resilience Levels and Coping with Stress Styles Total, there was a significant difference in the total values of Psychological Resilience Levels Total and Coping with Stress Styles Total on the Faculty Variable. There was no significant difference in the Total and Stress Coping Styles Total Values of the Students Psychological Resilience Levels according to the Doing Sports Variable. As a result of the tests, a significant difference was found between the ages of 18-21 and 25-27 in the Social Competence sub-dimension of the Psychological Resilience Scale in the Psychological Resilience Levels and Stress Coping Styles values in the Age Variable p0.05, while the Total value of the Stress Coping Styles Scale was 18. -There was a significant difference between the ages of 21 and 22-24. In the Optimistic Approach sub-dimension of the Stress Coping Styles Scale, there was a significant difference between the ages of 18-21 - 22-24 and 18-21 - 25-27.

 Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı, Kocaeli Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi ve Eğitim Fakültesindeki öğrencilerin psikolojik dayanıklılık ve stresle baş etme tarzlarını belirleyerek iki değişken arasında ilişkileri incelenmektedir. Yöntem: Araştırmanın evrenini Kocaeli Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Fakültesinde ve Kocaeli Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesinde öğrenim gören 2798 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Örneklem grubu 2022-2023 eğitim öğretim yılında eğitim gören 400 Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi ve Eğitim Fakültesi öğrencileri gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Araştırmada verilerin elde edilmesi için Friborg ve ark., 2003 tarafından geliştirilen ve 2011 yılında H. Nejat Basım ve Fatih Çetin tarafında Türkçeye uyarlanan Yetişkinler İçin Psikolojik Dayanıklılık Ölçeği ve öğrencilerin stresle baş etme tarzlarının inceleyebilmek için Lazarus ve Folkman 1980 tarafından geliştirilen, Şahin ve Durakın 1995 ise kısaltarak Türkçeye uyarladığı Stresle Başa Çıkma Tarzları Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde katılımcıların kişisel bilgi dağılımlarını incelemek için frekans analizi, verilerin normal dağılım gösterip göstermediğini belirlemek için skewness-kurtosis değerlerine bakılmıştır. Değişkenler arasındaki farklılıkları belirlemek amacıyla Anova, Tukey, Post-Hoc testleri yapılmıştır. İlişkiyi belirlemek için korelasyon analizinden faydalanılmıştır. Bulgular ve Sonuç: Yapılan analizler sonucunda; Yetişkinlerde Psikolojik Dayanıklılık Toplam ve Stresle Baş Etme Tarzları Toplam değerlerinde yüksek düzeyde pozitif ilişki bulunmuştur. Öğrencilerin cinsiyetleri göz önüne alındığında Psikolojik Dayanıklılık Düzeyleri Toplam ve Stresle Baş Etme Tarzları Toplam değerlerinde anlamda farklılık görülmemişken, Fakülte Değişkeni üzerinde Psikolojik Dayanıklılık Düzeyleri Toplam ve Stresle Baş Etme Tarzları Toplam değerlerinde anlamda farklılık görülmüştür. Öğrencilerin Psikolojik Dayanıklılık Düzeyleri Toplam ve Stresle Baş Etme Tarzları Toplam değerlerinde Spor Yapma Değişkenine göre ise anlamda farklılık bulunmamıştır. Yapılan testler sonucunda öğrencilerin Yaş Değişkeninde Psikolojik Dayanıklılık Düzeyleri ve Stresle Baş Etme Tarzları değerlerinde Psikolojik Dayanıklılık Ölçeği Sosyal Yeterlilik alt boyutunda 18-21 ve 25-27 yaşları arasında anlamda farklılık bulunmuşken. Stresle Baş Etme Tarzları Ölçeği Toplam değerinde 18-21-22-24 yaşları arasında anlamda farklılık bulunmuştur p0,05. Stresle Baş Etme Tarzları Ölçeği İyimser Yaklaşım alt boyutunda ise 18-21  22-24 ve 18-21  25-27 yaşları arasında anlamda farklılık görülmüştür.

Makale detayları

Students of Faculty of Sports Sciences and Faculty of Education Coping with Stress and Students' Resilience Levels Examination of Detection Methods

Yazarlar:

İhsan Yağcı | Cuneyt Seydioğlu | Engin Çinibulak

Yayıncı:

Kafkas University

Ana Başlıklar:

Spor Faaliyetleri Yönetimi

Dergi:

Kafkas Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi Vol.3 Issue 3, pp.161-182

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

10/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001298749

pISSN:

2791-8459

Psychological resilience

Coping with stress

Sports sciences

Educational sciencesPsikolojik Dayanıklılık

Stresle Baş Etme

Spor Bilimleri

Eğitim Bilimleri

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: İhsan Yağcı | Cuneyt Seydioğlu | Engin Çinibulak

Yayıncı: Kafkas University

Ana Başlıklar: Spor Faaliyetleri Yönetimi

Dergi: Kafkas Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi Vol.3 Issue 3, pp.161-182

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 10/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001298749

pISSN: 2791-8459

Sayı

Yazarlar:

İhsan Yağcı | Cuneyt Seydioğlu | Engin Çinibulak

Yayıncı:

Kafkas University

Ana Başlıklar:

Spor Faaliyetleri Yönetimi

Dergi:

Kafkas Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi Vol.3 Issue 3, pp.161-182

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

10/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001298749

pISSN:

2791-8459