Assessment of the Radiopacity of Different Fissure Sealants Compared to Dental Hard Tissues

Periş Çelikel; Aybike Baş; Fatih Şengül; Sera Şimşek Derelioğlu

Makale detayları

Assessment of the Radiopacity of Different Fissure Sealants Compared to Dental Hard Tissues

Yazarlar:

Periş Çelikel | Aybike Baş | Fatih Şengül | Sera Şimşek Derelioğlu

Yayıncı:

Necmettin Erbakan University

Ana Başlıklar:

Çocuk Diş Hekimliği

Dergi:

Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Dergisi Issue 3, pp.27-35

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

10/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001319609

pISSN:

2687-5535

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Aim: The radiopacity of dental materials is crucial for assessing the radiographic success of restorations and can significantly influence clinicians choice of materials. The objective of our study is to compare the radiopacity of five fissure sealants with that of compomer, composite, glass ionomer filling, and dental hard tissues using digital imaging techniques. Material and Method: Five different fissure sealants Fuji Triage, BeautiSealant, Grandio Seal, Helioseal F Plus, Embrace Wetbond, compomer Compoglass F, composite Solare X, and glass ionomer filling Equa Forte materials were prepared as 5 samples each in disk form with a thickness of 2 mm. As controls, sections of primary and permanent teeth with a thickness of 2 mm, along with an aluminum step wedge were utilized. The mean gray values of the samples were measured using Image J software, and the equivalent aluminum thickness was subsequently determined. Statistics analysis using Kruskal-Wallis test at p0.05. Results: The equivalent aluminum thicknesses related to the radiopacity of fissure sealants are ranked as follows: Fuji Triage 5.20.2  Grandio Seal 3.90.2  permanent tooth enamel 3.70.2  Embrace Wetbond 3.60.6  primary tooth enamel 3.60.3  BeautiSealent 2.10.3  Helioseal F Plus 1.10 p0.05. The radiopacity equivalent aluminum thicknesses of restorative materials are ranked as follows: Compoglass F 7.30.4  Solare X 4.70.3  Equa Forte 4.40.4  permanent tooth enamel 3.70.2  primary tooth enamel 3.60.3 p0.05. Conclusion: Materials like Fuji Triage and Compoglass F exhibit high radiopacity values, which can significantly aid clinical monitoring and restoration success.

 Aim: The radiopacity of dental materials is crucial for assessing the radiographic success of restorations and can significantly influence clinicians choice of materials. The objective of our study is to compare the radiopacity of five fissure sealants with that of compomer, composite, glass ionomer filling, and dental hard tissues using digital imaging techniques. Material and Method: Five different fissure sealants Fuji Triage, BeautiSealant, Grandio Seal, Helioseal F Plus, Embrace Wetbond, compomer Compoglass F, composite Solare X, and glass ionomer filling Equa Forte materials were prepared as 5 samples each in disk form with a thickness of 2 mm. As controls, sections of primary and permanent teeth with a thickness of 2 mm, along with an aluminum step wedge were utilized. The mean gray values of the samples were measured using Image J software, and the equivalent aluminum thickness was subsequently determined. Statistics analysis using Kruskal-Wallis test at p0.05. Results: The equivalent aluminum thicknesses related to the radiopacity of fissure sealants are ranked as follows: Fuji Triage 5.20.2  Grandio Seal 3.90.2  permanent tooth enamel 3.70.2  Embrace Wetbond 3.60.6  primary tooth enamel 3.60.3  BeautiSealent 2.10.3  Helioseal F Plus 1.10 p0.05. The radiopacity equivalent aluminum thicknesses of restorative materials are ranked as follows: Compoglass F 7.30.4  Solare X 4.70.3  Equa Forte 4.40.4  permanent tooth enamel 3.70.2  primary tooth enamel 3.60.3 p0.05. Conclusion: Materials like Fuji Triage and Compoglass F exhibit high radiopacity values, which can significantly aid clinical monitoring and restoration success.

 Aim: The radiopacity of dental materials is crucial for assessing the radiographic success of restorations and can significantly influence clinicians choice of materials. The objective of our study is to compare the radiopacity of five fissure sealants with that of compomer, composite, glass ionomer filling, and dental hard tissues using digital imaging techniques. Material and Method: Five different fissure sealants Fuji Triage, BeautiSealant, Grandio Seal, Helioseal F Plus, Embrace Wetbond, compomer Compoglass F, composite Solare X, and glass ionomer filling Equa Forte materials were prepared as 5 samples each in disk form with a thickness of 2 mm. As controls, sections of primary and permanent teeth with a thickness of 2 mm, along with an aluminum step wedge were utilized. The mean gray values of the samples were measured using Image J software, and the equivalent aluminum thickness was subsequently determined. Statistics analysis using Kruskal-Wallis test at p0.05. Results: The equivalent aluminum thicknesses related to the radiopacity of fissure sealants are ranked as follows: Fuji Triage 5.20.2  Grandio Seal 3.90.2  permanent tooth enamel 3.70.2  Embrace Wetbond 3.60.6  primary tooth enamel 3.60.3  BeautiSealent 2.10.3  Helioseal F Plus 1.10 p0.05. The radiopacity equivalent aluminum thicknesses of restorative materials are ranked as follows: Compoglass F 7.30.4  Solare X 4.70.3  Equa Forte 4.40.4  permanent tooth enamel 3.70.2  primary tooth enamel 3.60.3 p0.05. Conclusion: Materials like Fuji Triage and Compoglass F exhibit high radiopacity values, which can significantly aid clinical monitoring and restoration success.

 Amaç: Dental materyallerin radyoopasitesi yapılan restorasyonların radyografik başarısının belirlenmesinde rol oynamakta ve hekimlerin malzeme seçimini etkileyebilmektedir. Çalışmamızın amacı beş farklı fissür örtücünün kompomer,kompozit, cam iyonomer dolgu ve diş sert dokularına göre radyoopasitesinin dijital teknikle karşılaştırılmasıdır. Materyal ve Metod: Beş farklı fissür örtücü Fuji Triage, BeautiSealant, Grandio Seal, Helioseal F Plus, Embrace Wetbond, kompomer Compoglass F, kompozit Solare X ve cam iyonomer dolgu Equa Forte materyallerinden 2 mm kalınlığında 5er adet disk şeklinde örnekler hazırlandı. Kontrol olarak 2 mm kalınlığındaki süt ve daimi diş kesitleri ve alüminyum kademeli kama kullanıldı. Örneklerin ortalama gri değerleri Image J yazılımı kullanılarak ölçüldü ve eşdeğer alüminyum kalınlığı belirlendi. Veriler Kruskal-Wallis testi kullanılarak analiz edildi p0,05. Bulgular: Fissür örtücülerin radyoopasitesine ait eşdeğer alüminyum kalınlıkları Fuji Triage 5,20,2 Grandio Seal 3,90,2  daimi diş minesi 3,70,2  Embrace Wetbond 3,60,6  süt dişi minesi 3,60,3  BeautiSealent 2,10,3 Helioseal F Plus 1,10 şeklinde sıralanmışlardır p0,05. Restoratif materyal radyoopasitesine ait eşdeğer alüminyum kalınlıkları ise Compoglass F 7,30,4Solare X 4,70,3  Equa Forte 4,40,4  daimi diş minesi 3,70,2  süt dişi minesi 3,60,3 şeklinde sıralanmıştır p0,05. Sonuç: Fuji Triage ve Compoglass F gibi materyaller yüksek radyoopasite değerleri sergilemekte olup, bu özellikleri klinik takip ve restorasyon başarısında önemlidir.

Makale detayları

Assessment of the Radiopacity of Different Fissure Sealants Compared to Dental Hard Tissues

Yazarlar:

Periş Çelikel | Aybike Baş | Fatih Şengül | Sera Şimşek Derelioğlu

Yayıncı:

Necmettin Erbakan University

Ana Başlıklar:

Çocuk Diş Hekimliği

Dergi:

Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Dergisi Issue 3, pp.27-35

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

10/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001319609

pISSN:

2687-5535

Aluminum Step Wedge

Digital Dental Radiography

RadiopacityAlüminyum kademeli kama

dental dijital radyografi

radyoopasite

Sayı

Makale detayları

Assessment of the Radiopacity of Different Fissure Sealants Compared to Dental Hard Tissues

Yazarlar: Periş Çelikel | Aybike Baş | Fatih Şengül | Sera Şimşek Derelioğlu

Yayıncı: Necmettin Erbakan University

Ana Başlıklar: Çocuk Diş Hekimliği

Dergi: Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Dergisi Issue 3, pp.27-35

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 10/2024

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001319609

pISSN: 2687-5535

Aluminum Step Wedge

Digital Dental Radiography

RadiopacityAlüminyum kademeli kama

dental dijital radyografi

radyoopasite

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Periş Çelikel | Aybike Baş | Fatih Şengül | Sera Şimşek Derelioğlu

Yayıncı:

Necmettin Erbakan University

Ana Başlıklar:

Çocuk Diş Hekimliği

Dergi:

Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Dergisi Issue 3, pp.27-35

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

10/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001319609

pISSN:

2687-5535