On the Treatise on the Hadiyyat al-Muʾminīn Attributed to Jalālzāde Muṣṭafā Çelebi: An Introduction to Selīmnāma

Halim Yar

Makale detayları

On the Treatise on the Hadiyyat al-Muʾminīn Attributed to Jalālzāde Muṣṭafā Çelebi: An Introduction to Selīmnāma

Yazarlar:

Halim Yar

Yayıncı:

Ankara University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Araştırmaları (Diğer)

Dergi:

Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.66 Issue 1, pp.329-382

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001349526

pISSN:

1301-0522

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Nishānci Jalālzāde Muṣṭafā d. 9751567 was one of the most important diplomats of the Suleiman the Magnificent period, and was a writer who wrote many works, made translations, and was prominent with his prose. It is seen that Jalālzādes literary production increased after he retired from his duty as tughraī imperial scribe in 9641556-57. The text, thought to have been written during this period and referred to as Hadiyyat al-Muʾminīn in secondary sources, is registered at number NEKTY07204 in the Istanbul University Library. Since there is no introduction, it is not clear to which genre the text belongs. In secondary sources, it is stated that the subject of the text is a religious-moral treatise. It is noteworthy that the text can be considered as an introduction, as it contains praise, eulogy and exaltation towards Islamic important figures. In this article, we thought of examining Hadiyyat al-Muminīn, which we saw had not been examined before, in terms of form and content and presenting its text. When we examined Jalālzādes other works, we determined that the copy was actually the introduction of Selīmnāma. There have been two studies on the introduction of Selīmnāma so far. In one of these studies, transcription was used in the article but the introduction was not completed, and in the second study, transcription was not used in the publication of the Selīmnāmas text. In this article, we will first give brief information about the authors life and works. We will examine the formal elements of both the prose and verse sections of the introduction in question. We will give information about Jalālzādes prose and verse style and the content of the work. Therefore, we will present something different from these two studies. We will show the steps we followed to determine that the text in question was actually another work and make inferences about which genre it would be considered if it were an independent work. We will compare the book of Selīmnāma with the copy we have and list the places we found to be wrong in the book in a table.

 Nishānci Jalālzāde Muṣṭafā d. 9751567 was one of the most important diplomats of the Suleiman the Magnificent period, and was a writer who wrote many works, made translations, and was prominent with his prose. It is seen that Jalālzādes literary production increased after he retired from his duty as tughraī imperial scribe in 9641556-57. The text, thought to have been written during this period and referred to as Hadiyyat al-Muʾminīn in secondary sources, is registered at number NEKTY07204 in the Istanbul University Library. Since there is no introduction, it is not clear to which genre the text belongs. In secondary sources, it is stated that the subject of the text is a religious-moral treatise. It is noteworthy that the text can be considered as an introduction, as it contains praise, eulogy and exaltation towards Islamic important figures. In this article, we thought of examining Hadiyyat al-Muminīn, which we saw had not been examined before, in terms of form and content and presenting its text. When we examined Jalālzādes other works, we determined that the copy was actually the introduction of Selīmnāma. There have been two studies on the introduction of Selīmnāma so far. In one of these studies, transcription was used in the article but the introduction was not completed, and in the second study, transcription was not used in the publication of the Selīmnāmas text. In this article, we will first give brief information about the authors life and works. We will examine the formal elements of both the prose and verse sections of the introduction in question. We will give information about Jalālzādes prose and verse style and the content of the work. Therefore, we will present something different from these two studies. We will show the steps we followed to determine that the text in question was actually another work and make inferences about which genre it would be considered if it were an independent work. We will compare the book of Selīmnāma with the copy we have and list the places we found to be wrong in the book in a table.

 Nishānci Jalālzāde Muṣṭafā d. 9751567 was one of the most important diplomats of the Suleiman the Magnificent period, and was a writer who wrote many works, made translations, and was prominent with his prose. It is seen that Jalālzādes literary production increased after he retired from his duty as tughraī imperial scribe in 9641556-57. The text, thought to have been written during this period and referred to as Hadiyyat al-Muʾminīn in secondary sources, is registered at number NEKTY07204 in the Istanbul University Library. Since there is no introduction, it is not clear to which genre the text belongs. In secondary sources, it is stated that the subject of the text is a religious-moral treatise. It is noteworthy that the text can be considered as an introduction, as it contains praise, eulogy and exaltation towards Islamic important figures. In this article, we thought of examining Hadiyyat al-Muminīn, which we saw had not been examined before, in terms of form and content and presenting its text. When we examined Jalālzādes other works, we determined that the copy was actually the introduction of Selīmnāma. There have been two studies on the introduction of Selīmnāma so far. In one of these studies, transcription was used in the article but the introduction was not completed, and in the second study, transcription was not used in the publication of the Selīmnāmas text. In this article, we will first give brief information about the authors life and works. We will examine the formal elements of both the prose and verse sections of the introduction in question. We will give information about Jalālzādes prose and verse style and the content of the work. Therefore, we will present something different from these two studies. We will show the steps we followed to determine that the text in question was actually another work and make inferences about which genre it would be considered if it were an independent work. We will compare the book of Selīmnāma with the copy we have and list the places we found to be wrong in the book in a table.

 Nişāncı Celālzāde Muṣṭafā ö. 9751567 Kanuni döneminin en önemli diplomatlarından birisi olup birçok eser kaleme almış, çeviriler yapmış, nesirdeki ustalığıyla tanınmış bir yazardır. Celālzādenin nişancılık görevinden emekliliğe ayrıldığı 9641556-57 sonrasında, eserlerinin arttığı görülmektedir. Bu dönemde yazdığı düşünülen ve ikincil kaynaklarda Hediyyetül-Müʾminīn ismiyle anılan metin; İstanbul Üniversitesi Nadir Eserler Kütüphanesi, NEKTY07204 numarada kayıtlıdır. Bir sebeb-i teʾlīfi olmadığından metnin hangi türe ait olduğu anlaşılamamaktadır. İkincil kaynaklarda konusu dolayısıyla metnin bir dinî ahlaki risale olduğu belirtilir. Metnin ḥamdele, ṣalvele ve İslam büyüklerine övgüye dair bir içeriğe sahipliğinden ötürü bir mukaddime olabileceği göze çarpar. Önceden incelenmediğini gördüğümüz Hediyyetül-Müʾminīni şekil ve içerik yönünden araştırmayı ve metnini ortaya koymayı düşündük. Celālzādenin diğer eserlerini tetkikimiz neticesinde nüshanın aslında Selīmnāmenin mukaddimesi olduğunu tespit ettik. Selīmnāmenin mukaddimesi hakkında şu ana kadar iki tane çalışma yapılmıştır. Ahmet Uğurun makalesinde çevriyazı kullanılmakla birlikte mukaddime tamamlanmamış, ikinci çalışma olan Selīmnāme metninin yayınında ise çevriyazı kullanılmamıştır. Her iki çalışmada da içerik incelemesi yapılmamıştır. Biz bu makalede öncelikle yazarın hayatı ve eserleri hakkında kısa bilgiler sunacağız. Müstensiḫ tarafından Hediyyetül-Müʾminīn şeklinde yeniden isimlendirilen söz konusu mukaddimenin hem mensur hem manzum bölümlerinin şeklî unsurlarını, yazarın mensur ve manzum üslubu ile içerik incelemesini de vereceğimizden dolayı bu iki çalışmadan ayrılacağız. Söz konusu metnin; aslında başka eser olduğu tespiti aşamalarımızı gösterecek, mukaddimenin eğer bir müstakil eser olsaydı türü ne olurdu hakkında çıkarsamalarda bulunacağız. Selīmnāme kitabı ile elimizdeki nüshayı karşılaştırdığımız ve kitapta hatalı bulduğumuz yerleri bir çizelgede serdedeceğiz.

Makale detayları

On the Treatise on the Hadiyyat al-Muʾminīn Attributed to Jalālzāde Muṣṭafā Çelebi: An Introduction to Selīmnāma

Yazarlar:

Halim Yar

Yayıncı:

Ankara University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Araştırmaları (Diğer)

Dergi:

Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.66 Issue 1, pp.329-382

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001349526

pISSN:

1301-0522

Turkish Islamic Literature

Jalālzāde Muṣṭafā Celebi

Naṣīḥatnāma

Munādjāt

Selīmnāma.Türk İslam Edebiyatı

Celalzāde Muṣṭafā Çelebi

Naṣīḥatnāme

Münācāt

Selīmnāme

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Halim Yar

Yayıncı: Ankara University

Ana Başlıklar: İslam Araştırmaları (Diğer)

Dergi: Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.66 Issue 1, pp.329-382

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 5/2025

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001349526

pISSN: 1301-0522

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Halim Yar

Yayıncı:

Ankara University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Araştırmaları (Diğer)

Dergi:

Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.66 Issue 1, pp.329-382

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001349526

pISSN:

1301-0522