A Comparison of the Structure of Propositions From Aristotle to Islamic Logic

Enver Şahin

Makale detayları

A Comparison of the Structure of Propositions From Aristotle to Islamic Logic

Yazarlar:

Enver Şahin

Yayıncı:

Mardin Artuklu University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sistematik Felsefe (Diğer)

Dergi:

Artuklu Akademi Vol.11 Issue 1, pp.67-81

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321446

pISSN:

2148-3264

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 This article focuses on whether the distinction between categorical and hypothetical propositions that exists in language also exists in thought and being. In the book Peri Hermenias, written by Aristotle BC 322 on the nature of words, only the nature of categorical propositions is mentioned. In the eleventh century, Avicenna d. 1037 touched upon the properties of hypothetical propositions, which Aristotle had not included in his works, and pointed outadmonished their differences from categorical propositions. On the other hand, Averroes d.1198, a devoted follower of Aristotle, claimed that hypothetical propositions were no different from categorical propositions, which Aristotle mentioned as the only type of propositions, and argued that some hypothetical propositions can be reduced to categorical propositions. In this article, the arguments put forward in the debates starting from the 11th century and continuing until the 14th century will be discussed, and the strength of the arguments requiring preference ķuwwa al-tašīr will be emphasised.

 This article focuses on whether the distinction between categorical and hypothetical propositions that exists in language also exists in thought and being. In the book Peri Hermenias, written by Aristotle BC 322 on the nature of words, only the nature of categorical propositions is mentioned. In the eleventh century, Avicenna d. 1037 touched upon the properties of hypothetical propositions, which Aristotle had not included in his works, and pointed outadmonished their differences from categorical propositions. On the other hand, Averroes d.1198, a devoted follower of Aristotle, claimed that hypothetical propositions were no different from categorical propositions, which Aristotle mentioned as the only type of propositions, and argued that some hypothetical propositions can be reduced to categorical propositions. In this article, the arguments put forward in the debates starting from the 11th century and continuing until the 14th century will be discussed, and the strength of the arguments requiring preference ķuwwa al-tašīr will be emphasised.

 This article focuses on whether the distinction between categorical and hypothetical propositions that exists in language also exists in thought and being. In the book Peri Hermenias, written by Aristotle BC 322 on the nature of words, only the nature of categorical propositions is mentioned. In the eleventh century, Avicenna d. 1037 touched upon the properties of hypothetical propositions, which Aristotle had not included in his works, and pointed outadmonished their differences from categorical propositions. On the other hand, Averroes d.1198, a devoted follower of Aristotle, claimed that hypothetical propositions were no different from categorical propositions, which Aristotle mentioned as the only type of propositions, and argued that some hypothetical propositions can be reduced to categorical propositions. In this article, the arguments put forward in the debates starting from the 11th century and continuing until the 14th century will be discussed, and the strength of the arguments requiring preference ķuwwa al-tašīr will be emphasised.

 Bu makalede, dildelafızda var olan yüklemli ve şartlı önerme ayrımının düşünce ve varlıkta da mevcut olup olmadığının üzerinde durulacak, buna ilaveten İslam mantık tarihi içerisinde ele alınan şartlı önermelerin mahiyetine dair bir bakış açısı sunulmaya çalışılacaktır. Aristoteles Ö. 322 tarafından sözün neliği üzerine yazılan Peri Hermenias adlı kitapta sadece yüklemli kategorik önermelerin mahiyetinden bahsedilmektedir. Buna mukabil İbn Sînâ, ö.1037 şartlı önermelerin hükümlerine değinerek onların yüklemli önermelerden farklı olan taraflarına işaret etmektedir. Aristoteles takipçisi İbn Rüşd ö. 1198 ise şartlı önermelerin Aristotelesin önermenin tek türü olarak kabul ettiği kategorik önermelerden farklı olmadığını iddia etmiş, bazı şartlı önermelerin yüklemli önermelere indirgenebilir olduğunu savunmuştur. Bu makalede, 11. yüzyıldan başlayıp 14. yüzyıla kadar devam eden tartışmalarda ileri sürülen deliller ele alınacak, tercihi gerektiren delillerin kuvvet dereceleri ķuwwa al-tašīr üzerinde durulacaktır.

Makale detayları

A Comparison of the Structure of Propositions From Aristotle to Islamic Logic

Yazarlar:

Enver Şahin

Yayıncı:

Mardin Artuklu University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sistematik Felsefe (Diğer)

Dergi:

Artuklu Akademi Vol.11 Issue 1, pp.67-81

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321446

pISSN:

2148-3264

Proposition

Categorical Proposition

Predicate

Hypothetical Proposition

Judgment

Relation.Önerme

Yüklemli Önerme

Yüklem

Şartlı Önerme

Hüküm

Nispet.

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Enver Şahin

Yayıncı: Mardin Artuklu University

Ana Başlıklar: Sistematik Felsefe (Diğer)

Dergi: Artuklu Akademi Vol.11 Issue 1, pp.67-81

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001321446

pISSN: 2148-3264

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Enver Şahin

Yayıncı:

Mardin Artuklu University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sistematik Felsefe (Diğer)

Dergi:

Artuklu Akademi Vol.11 Issue 1, pp.67-81

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321446

pISSN:

2148-3264