Withdrawal of Ordinary Execution Proceedings and Some Issues Arising in Enforcement Law

Nurbanu Erzurumlu Işık; Cansu Korkmaz

Makale detayları

Withdrawal of Ordinary Execution Proceedings and Some Issues Arising in Enforcement Law

Yazarlar:

Nurbanu Erzurumlu Işık | Cansu Korkmaz

Yayıncı:

Ankara University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.73 Issue 2, pp.1191-1254

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001324815

pISSN:

1301-1308

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 A creditor who cannot obtain their debt in accordance with the rules prescribed by substantive law may apply to the states compulsory execution authorities to collect their debt. Ordinary execution proceedings provided for monetary and secured credits, is one of non-judicial execution common in practice. To start the process of ordinary execution, as well as to continue or to terminate it is within the disposition of creditor. Just as in the case that the debt is paid during the execution process, the creditor may not proceed with the ongoing execution for some reason. There is not established rule about how the declaration of a creditor on the withdrawal of the execution proceedings should be interpreted and what its consequences could be. This study focuses on both the legal nature of the creditors declaration of withdrawal of execution proceedings and some of its legal consequences, which leads to some problems in practice. In this context, has been examined, particularly considering judicial decisions on matters such as pendency, complaint, lawsuit for annulment of objections, lawsuit for negative declaration, termination of the tender.

 A creditor who cannot obtain their debt in accordance with the rules prescribed by substantive law may apply to the states compulsory execution authorities to collect their debt. Ordinary execution proceedings provided for monetary and secured credits, is one of non-judicial execution common in practice. To start the process of ordinary execution, as well as to continue or to terminate it is within the disposition of creditor. Just as in the case that the debt is paid during the execution process, the creditor may not proceed with the ongoing execution for some reason. There is not established rule about how the declaration of a creditor on the withdrawal of the execution proceedings should be interpreted and what its consequences could be. This study focuses on both the legal nature of the creditors declaration of withdrawal of execution proceedings and some of its legal consequences, which leads to some problems in practice. In this context, has been examined, particularly considering judicial decisions on matters such as pendency, complaint, lawsuit for annulment of objections, lawsuit for negative declaration, termination of the tender.

 A creditor who cannot obtain their debt in accordance with the rules prescribed by substantive law may apply to the states compulsory execution authorities to collect their debt. Ordinary execution proceedings provided for monetary and secured credits, is one of non-judicial execution common in practice. To start the process of ordinary execution, as well as to continue or to terminate it is within the disposition of creditor. Just as in the case that the debt is paid during the execution process, the creditor may not proceed with the ongoing execution for some reason. There is not established rule about how the declaration of a creditor on the withdrawal of the execution proceedings should be interpreted and what its consequences could be. This study focuses on both the legal nature of the creditors declaration of withdrawal of execution proceedings and some of its legal consequences, which leads to some problems in practice. In this context, has been examined, particularly considering judicial decisions on matters such as pendency, complaint, lawsuit for annulment of objections, lawsuit for negative declaration, termination of the tender.

 Maddî hukukun öngördüğü kurallar çerçevesinde alacağına kavuşamayan alacaklının alacağını elde edebilmek için devletin cebrî icra organlarına başvurabilmesi mümkündür. Para ve teminat alacakları bakımından kabul edilen genel haciz yolu ile takip, ilamsız icranın bir türü olup uygulamada sıklıkla başvurulan takip yollarından birisidir. Genel haciz yolu ile takibe başvuru alacaklının tasarrufunda olup, söz konusu takibe devam etmek ya da takibi sona erdirmek bakımından da yine alacaklının tasarruf yetkisi bulunmaktadır. Alacaklı başlatmış olduğu takibe, alacağın takip devam ederken ödenmesinde olduğu gibi, herhangi bir sebeple devam etmek istemeyebilir. Alacaklının takibe devam etmeyeceği yönündeki beyanının ne şekilde anlaşılması gerektiği ve bunun maddî hukuk ve usûl hukuku açısından meydana getirdiği hüküm ve sonuçlar yönünden yerleşik bir uygulamadan bahsedilebilmesi mümkün değildir. Bu çalışma ile hem alacaklının takibi geri almaya ilişkin beyanının hukukî niteliği hem de bunun hukuken ortaya çıkardığı ve uygulamada sorun teşkil eden bazı sonuçları üzerinde durulmuştur. Bu çerçevede özellikle derdestlik, şikâyet, itirazın iptali, menfî tespit davası, ihalenin feshi gibi hususlarda yargı kararları da dikkate alınarak değerlendirme yapılmıştır.

Makale detayları

Withdrawal of Ordinary Execution Proceedings and Some Issues Arising in Enforcement Law

Yazarlar:

Nurbanu Erzurumlu Işık | Cansu Korkmaz

Yayıncı:

Ankara University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.73 Issue 2, pp.1191-1254

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001324815

pISSN:

1301-1308

Ordinary execution proceedings

withdrawal of execution proceedings

waiver of execution proceedings

renunciation of execution proceedings

consequences of withdrawing execution proceedingsGenel haciz yoluyla takip

takibin geri alınması

takipten vazgeçme

takipten feragat

geri almanın sonuçları.

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Nurbanu Erzurumlu Işık | Cansu Korkmaz

Yayıncı: Ankara University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi: Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.73 Issue 2, pp.1191-1254

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 7/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001324815

pISSN: 1301-1308

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Nurbanu Erzurumlu Işık | Cansu Korkmaz

Yayıncı:

Ankara University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.73 Issue 2, pp.1191-1254

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001324815

pISSN:

1301-1308