Some Thoughts on the Application of Mediation as a Case Condition in Lease Disputes

Süleyman Burak Gündoğdu

Makale detayları

Some Thoughts on the Application of Mediation as a Case Condition in Lease Disputes

Yazarlar:

Süleyman Burak Gündoğdu

Yayıncı:

Necmettin Erbakan University

Ana Başlıklar:

Özel Hukuk ve Medeni Yükümlülükler (Diğer)

Dergi:

Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.6 Issue 2, pp.851-880

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001296103

pISSN:

2667-4076

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Lease disputes are convenient for mediation as the parties can freely act upon them. Since the adoption of the mediation institution in our country, it has become mandatory to apply to mediation before filing a lawsuit for lease disputes as it could be resolved through mediation willingly before. In the event that a lawsuit is filed directly without applying to mediation, the court shall dismiss the lawsuit procedurally due to the lack of a case condition. If the parties reach an agreement in the negotiations held in front of the mediator, they may apply to court to obtain an enforceability annotation for the agreement document to use in enforcement offices. However, in our opinion, the resolution of lease disputes before the mediator, especially in terms of residential and roofed workplaces, seems highly difficult in the face of the mandatory regulations stipulated in the Turkish Code of Obligations. Ultimately, these mandatory regulations should be complied with in the event that the parties agree before the mediator. These mandatory regulations, which have been introduced in order to protect the tenant, particularly in terms of residential and roofed workplaces, may cause problems in practice in terms of making an agreement and obtaining an enforceability annotation for this agreement document. In our study, by drawing attention to the absolute and relative mandatory regulations stipulated in the lease law, issues such as the prohibition of arrangement against the tenant, the tenants security deposit, determination of the rent fee in lease renewal periods, limitation of the causes of litigation, determination of the rent fee in foreign currency, the case that the leased property is a family residence, whether an eviction commitment can be given with the agreement document as a result of the negotiations in mediation, and the problems that may be encountered in practice are discussed.

 Lease disputes are convenient for mediation as the parties can freely act upon them. Since the adoption of the mediation institution in our country, it has become mandatory to apply to mediation before filing a lawsuit for lease disputes as it could be resolved through mediation willingly before. In the event that a lawsuit is filed directly without applying to mediation, the court shall dismiss the lawsuit procedurally due to the lack of a case condition. If the parties reach an agreement in the negotiations held in front of the mediator, they may apply to court to obtain an enforceability annotation for the agreement document to use in enforcement offices. However, in our opinion, the resolution of lease disputes before the mediator, especially in terms of residential and roofed workplaces, seems highly difficult in the face of the mandatory regulations stipulated in the Turkish Code of Obligations. Ultimately, these mandatory regulations should be complied with in the event that the parties agree before the mediator. These mandatory regulations, which have been introduced in order to protect the tenant, particularly in terms of residential and roofed workplaces, may cause problems in practice in terms of making an agreement and obtaining an enforceability annotation for this agreement document. In our study, by drawing attention to the absolute and relative mandatory regulations stipulated in the lease law, issues such as the prohibition of arrangement against the tenant, the tenants security deposit, determination of the rent fee in lease renewal periods, limitation of the causes of litigation, determination of the rent fee in foreign currency, the case that the leased property is a family residence, whether an eviction commitment can be given with the agreement document as a result of the negotiations in mediation, and the problems that may be encountered in practice are discussed.

 Lease disputes are convenient for mediation as the parties can freely act upon them. Since the adoption of the mediation institution in our country, it has become mandatory to apply to mediation before filing a lawsuit for lease disputes as it could be resolved through mediation willingly before. In the event that a lawsuit is filed directly without applying to mediation, the court shall dismiss the lawsuit procedurally due to the lack of a case condition. If the parties reach an agreement in the negotiations held in front of the mediator, they may apply to court to obtain an enforceability annotation for the agreement document to use in enforcement offices. However, in our opinion, the resolution of lease disputes before the mediator, especially in terms of residential and roofed workplaces, seems highly difficult in the face of the mandatory regulations stipulated in the Turkish Code of Obligations. Ultimately, these mandatory regulations should be complied with in the event that the parties agree before the mediator. These mandatory regulations, which have been introduced in order to protect the tenant, particularly in terms of residential and roofed workplaces, may cause problems in practice in terms of making an agreement and obtaining an enforceability annotation for this agreement document. In our study, by drawing attention to the absolute and relative mandatory regulations stipulated in the lease law, issues such as the prohibition of arrangement against the tenant, the tenants security deposit, determination of the rent fee in lease renewal periods, limitation of the causes of litigation, determination of the rent fee in foreign currency, the case that the leased property is a family residence, whether an eviction commitment can be given with the agreement document as a result of the negotiations in mediation, and the problems that may be encountered in practice are discussed.

 Kira uyuşmazlıkları, esas itibariyle tarafların üzerinde serbestçe tasarruf edebileceği uyuşmazlıklar olarak arabuluculuğa elverişlidir. Ülkemizde arabuluculuk müessesesinin kabul edildiği andan itibaren bu gerekçeyle ihtiyari olarak arabuluculuk yoluyla çözülebilen kira uyuşmazlıkları için artık dava açılmadan önce arabuluculuğa başvuru yapılması zorunlu hâle getirilmiştir. Arabuluculuğa başvuru yapılmaksızın doğrudan dava açılmak istenmesi hâlinde mahkeme davayı dava şartı yokluğundan usûlden reddedecektir. Taraflar arabulucu önünde gerçekleştirilen müzakerelerde anlaştığı takdirde, anlaşma belgesi için icra edilebilirlik şerhi almak suretiyle ilamlı icra yoluna başvurabilecektir. Bununla birlikte kira uyuşmazlıklarının arabulucu önünde çözülmesi, özellikle konut ve çatılı işyerleri açısından kanaatimizce Türk Borçlar Kanununda bu konuda öngörülen emredici düzenlemeler karşısında, oldukça zor görünmektedir. Nihayetinde arabulucu önünde tarafların anlaşması ihtimalinde de bu emredici düzenlemelere riayet edilmelidir. Özellikle konut ve çatılı işyerleri açısından kiracıyı koruma amacıyla getirilen bu emredici düzenlemeler, uygulamada, anlaşma yapılması ve bu anlaşma belgesinin icra edilebilirlik şerhi alabilmesi noktasında sorunlara sebebiyet verebilecek niteliktedir. Çalışmamızda kira hukukunda öngörülen mutlak ve nisbi emredici düzenlemelere dikkat çekilmeye çalışılarak, kiracı aleyhine düzenleme yasağı, kiracının güvence bedeli vermesi, yenilenen kira dönemlerinde kira bedelinin belirlenmesi, dava sebeplerinin sınırlılığı, kira bedelinin yabancı para cinsinden belirlenmesi, kiralananın aile konutu olması, arabuluculukta gerçekleştirilen müzakereler neticesinde anlaşma belgesiyle tahliye taahhüdü verilip verilemeyeceği gibi konular ele alınmakta ve uygulama açısından karşılaşılabilecek sorunlara değinilmektedir.

Makale detayları

Some Thoughts on the Application of Mediation as a Case Condition in Lease Disputes

Yazarlar:

Süleyman Burak Gündoğdu

Yayıncı:

Necmettin Erbakan University

Ana Başlıklar:

Özel Hukuk ve Medeni Yükümlülükler (Diğer)

Dergi:

Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.6 Issue 2, pp.851-880

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001296103

pISSN:

2667-4076

lease law

mediation

case condition

mandatory regulationskira hukuku

arabuluculuk

dava şartı

emredici düzenlemeler

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Süleyman Burak Gündoğdu

Yayıncı: Necmettin Erbakan University

Ana Başlıklar: Özel Hukuk ve Medeni Yükümlülükler (Diğer)

Dergi: Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.6 Issue 2, pp.851-880

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 12/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001296103

pISSN: 2667-4076

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Süleyman Burak Gündoğdu

Yayıncı:

Necmettin Erbakan University

Ana Başlıklar:

Özel Hukuk ve Medeni Yükümlülükler (Diğer)

Dergi:

Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.6 Issue 2, pp.851-880

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001296103

pISSN:

2667-4076