THE EARLY REPUBLICAN PERIOD'S PERSPECTIVE ON THE SECOND CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY AND THE COMMITEE OF UNION AND PROGRESS

Gülsüm Tütüncü

Makale detayları

THE EARLY REPUBLICAN PERIOD'S PERSPECTIVE ON THE SECOND CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY AND THE COMMITEE OF UNION AND PROGRESS

Yazarlar:

Gülsüm Tütüncü

Yayıncı:

Dokuz Eylul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Tarihi | Türk Siyasi Tarihi | Yakınçağ Osmanlı Tarihi

Dergi:

Çağdaş Türkiye Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi Vol.24 Issue 49, pp.605-653

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001334754

pISSN:

1300-0756

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 This study aims to elucidate the Early Republican perspective on the Second Constitutional Monarchy and the Committee of Union and Progress through a comprehensive evaluation of prevailing attitudes. To this end, the study seeks to address the following questions: Did the initial generations of the Republic differentiate between the Second Constitutional Monarchy and the Committee of Union and Progress, or did they perceive them as a singular entity? What were the underlying reasons for their positive or negative attitudes? Furthermore, did these early generations of the Republic acknowledge the continuity between the Committee of Union and Progress and the Kemalist ideology of the Republic, as various scholars have suggested? Most leading figures who founded the Turkish Republic had, to varying degrees, participated in the Second Constitutional Era. Their perspectives on this period, in which they were once involved, are shaped by their personal experiences. Furthermore, the Republics stance towards the Second Constitutional Era and the Committee of Union and Progress also influences these individuals views. The primary sources for addressing the research questions and understanding these attitudes are the commentaries, many of which are memoirs, published in early Republican periodicals, particularly in the newspapers Akşam, Son Posta, Milliyet, and Cumhuriyet. These personal accounts are both subjective and invaluable, given the limitations on accessing archival materials necessary for writing a comprehensive history of the Committee of Union and Progress. As the Second Constitutional Era and the Committee of Union and Progress have been extensively studied within historical scholarship, the key texts on the subject were reviewed to assess the existing literatures approach. An introduction and analysis of the sources of the research is included at the beginning of the study. The findings and assessments of the various attitudes towards the period are presented in the final section, titled The Second Constitutional Era and the Committee of Union and Progress in Early Republican Newspapers and Memoirs. In the conclusion, answers to the research questions are provided, drawing on the studys findings, and the Early Republican periods perspective on the Second Constitutional Era and the Union and Progress is established based on a synthesis of these attitudes.

 This study aims to elucidate the Early Republican perspective on the Second Constitutional Monarchy and the Committee of Union and Progress through a comprehensive evaluation of prevailing attitudes. To this end, the study seeks to address the following questions: Did the initial generations of the Republic differentiate between the Second Constitutional Monarchy and the Committee of Union and Progress, or did they perceive them as a singular entity? What were the underlying reasons for their positive or negative attitudes? Furthermore, did these early generations of the Republic acknowledge the continuity between the Committee of Union and Progress and the Kemalist ideology of the Republic, as various scholars have suggested? Most leading figures who founded the Turkish Republic had, to varying degrees, participated in the Second Constitutional Era. Their perspectives on this period, in which they were once involved, are shaped by their personal experiences. Furthermore, the Republics stance towards the Second Constitutional Era and the Committee of Union and Progress also influences these individuals views. The primary sources for addressing the research questions and understanding these attitudes are the commentaries, many of which are memoirs, published in early Republican periodicals, particularly in the newspapers Akşam, Son Posta, Milliyet, and Cumhuriyet. These personal accounts are both subjective and invaluable, given the limitations on accessing archival materials necessary for writing a comprehensive history of the Committee of Union and Progress. As the Second Constitutional Era and the Committee of Union and Progress have been extensively studied within historical scholarship, the key texts on the subject were reviewed to assess the existing literatures approach. An introduction and analysis of the sources of the research is included at the beginning of the study. The findings and assessments of the various attitudes towards the period are presented in the final section, titled The Second Constitutional Era and the Committee of Union and Progress in Early Republican Newspapers and Memoirs. In the conclusion, answers to the research questions are provided, drawing on the studys findings, and the Early Republican periods perspective on the Second Constitutional Era and the Union and Progress is established based on a synthesis of these attitudes.

 This study aims to elucidate the Early Republican perspective on the Second Constitutional Monarchy and the Committee of Union and Progress through a comprehensive evaluation of prevailing attitudes. To this end, the study seeks to address the following questions: Did the initial generations of the Republic differentiate between the Second Constitutional Monarchy and the Committee of Union and Progress, or did they perceive them as a singular entity? What were the underlying reasons for their positive or negative attitudes? Furthermore, did these early generations of the Republic acknowledge the continuity between the Committee of Union and Progress and the Kemalist ideology of the Republic, as various scholars have suggested? Most leading figures who founded the Turkish Republic had, to varying degrees, participated in the Second Constitutional Era. Their perspectives on this period, in which they were once involved, are shaped by their personal experiences. Furthermore, the Republics stance towards the Second Constitutional Era and the Committee of Union and Progress also influences these individuals views. The primary sources for addressing the research questions and understanding these attitudes are the commentaries, many of which are memoirs, published in early Republican periodicals, particularly in the newspapers Akşam, Son Posta, Milliyet, and Cumhuriyet. These personal accounts are both subjective and invaluable, given the limitations on accessing archival materials necessary for writing a comprehensive history of the Committee of Union and Progress. As the Second Constitutional Era and the Committee of Union and Progress have been extensively studied within historical scholarship, the key texts on the subject were reviewed to assess the existing literatures approach. An introduction and analysis of the sources of the research is included at the beginning of the study. The findings and assessments of the various attitudes towards the period are presented in the final section, titled The Second Constitutional Era and the Committee of Union and Progress in Early Republican Newspapers and Memoirs. In the conclusion, answers to the research questions are provided, drawing on the studys findings, and the Early Republican periods perspective on the Second Constitutional Era and the Union and Progress is established based on a synthesis of these attitudes.

 Bu çalışmanın amacı; Erken Cumhuriyet Döneminin İkinci Meşrutiyet II. Meşrutiyet ile İttihat ve Terakkiye bakışını genel bir tutum değerlendirmesi yaparak açıklamaktır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda cevabı aranan araştırma soruları; Cumhuriyetin ilk kuşakları II. Meşrutiyet ile İttihat ve Terakkiyi birbirinden ayırmış mıdır? Yoksa bir bütün olarak mı görmüşlerdir? Tutumlarının olumlu ya da olumsuz olmasını etkileyen nedenler nelerdir? Çeşitli araştırmacıların savunduğu gibi İttihat ve Terakki ile Cumhuriyetin Kemalist İdeolojisi arasındaki devamlılık Cumhuriyetin ilk kuşakları tarafından dile getirilmiş midir? olarak belirlendi. Cumhuriyeti kuran kadroların çoğu II. Meşrutiyet döneminde az ya da çok rol almışlardı. Geçmişte içinde bulundukları bir döneme ilişkin tutumları bu yaşanmışlığın etkisi altındadır. Ayrıca Cumhuriyetin II. Meşrutiyet ile İttihat ve Terakki Cemiyetine karşı takındığı tutum, kişisel tutumlara etki etmektedir. Araştırma sorularının cevaplandırılması ve tutumun belirlenmesi için kullanılan başlıca kaynaklar; Erken Cumhuriyet Döneminin süreli yayınlarında başta Akşam, Son Posta, Milliyet ve Cumhuriyet gazetelerinde yayınlanan çoğunluğu hatırat kapsamında olan tefrikalardır. Tefrikaların içerdiği bilgiler öznel olmakla birlikte İttihat ve Terakki Cemiyetinin tarihini oluşturmak için arşivine başvurulamaması nedeniyle değerlidirler. II. Meşrutiyet ile İttihat ve Terakki Cemiyetinin tarih yazınının en fazla çalışılan konularından olması sebebiyle konuya ilişkin başlıca kitaplar değerlendirilerek, literatürün yaklaşımı da tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Araştırmanın kaynaklarına ilişkin tanıtım ve analiz çalışmanın başına dahil edilmiştir. Çalışma tutuma ilişkin bulgu ve değerlendirmelerini son bölüm olan Erken Cumhuriyet Döneminde Tefrikalara göre II. Meşrutiyet ile İttihat ve Terakkiye Bakış başlığı altında sunmaktadır. Sonuç bölümünde araştırmanın bulguları dahilinde araştırma sorularının yanıtları oluşturulmuş ve tefrikaların tutumlarına ilişkin hazırlanan tablo ışığında Erken Cumhuriyet Döneminin İkinci Meşrutiyet ile İttihat ve Terakkiye bakışı tespit edilmiştir.

Makale detayları

THE EARLY REPUBLICAN PERIOD'S PERSPECTIVE ON THE SECOND CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY AND THE COMMITEE OF UNION AND PROGRESS

Yazarlar:

Gülsüm Tütüncü

Yayıncı:

Dokuz Eylul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Tarihi | Türk Siyasi Tarihi | Yakınçağ Osmanlı Tarihi

Dergi:

Çağdaş Türkiye Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi Vol.24 Issue 49, pp.605-653

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001334754

pISSN:

1300-0756

Second Constitutional Monarchy

Committee of Union and Progress

Early Republican Period

Attitude Appraisal

Son Posta Newspaper

Akşam Newspaper

Milliyet Newspaperİkinci Meşrutiyet

İttihat ve Terakki

Erken Cumhuriyet Dönemi

Tutum Değerleme

Son Posta Gazetesi

Akşam Gazetesi

Milliyet Gazetesi

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Gülsüm Tütüncü

Yayıncı: Dokuz Eylul University

Ana Başlıklar: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Tarihi | Türk Siyasi Tarihi | Yakınçağ Osmanlı Tarihi

Dergi: Çağdaş Türkiye Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi Vol.24 Issue 49, pp.605-653

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 12/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001334754

pISSN: 1300-0756

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Gülsüm Tütüncü

Yayıncı:

Dokuz Eylul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Tarihi | Türk Siyasi Tarihi | Yakınçağ Osmanlı Tarihi

Dergi:

Çağdaş Türkiye Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi Vol.24 Issue 49, pp.605-653

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001334754

pISSN:

1300-0756