Matter Truth to Reach as One of the Objectives of Criminal Proceeding “Reaching material truth? Is the provision to establish a reality?”

N.A.

Makale detayları

Matter Truth to Reach as One of the Objectives of Criminal Proceeding “Reaching material truth? Is the provision to establish a reality?”

Yazarlar:

N.A.

Yayıncı:

Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ceza Muhakemeleri Usulü

Dergi:

Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.18 Issue 2, pp.962-999

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

10/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001303009

pISSN:

1306-3839

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The reasoning activity, regardless of which branch of law it belongs to, is Occurrence-oriented and is a Law of Occurrence. It is not a formal law consisting of formalities, but has a material content. The fact that different methods have been adopted in criminal procedure and in civil judgment, in terms of collecting case materials, does not mean that civil judgment has only a purpose of reaching the formal truth. The truth is one and the same for every judicial branch. As a result of criminal proceedings, the basis of the judges conscientious opinion regarding the proof of the act not generally constitute a mere substantive truth. It refers to a projection of the verb, which has predominantly material content, which is checked for compliance with the law within the framework of balancing the conflicting interests with the alleged commission of a crime. The substantive truth is the part of a lived event that the judge is convinced with justification and renders a judgment within the framework of the procedural rules that determine the legality of the evidence. In other words, it is the verdict. In a system where there are strict exclusion rules, the substantive truth rather expresses an appearance determined by these rules and has a predominantly normative content.

 The reasoning activity, regardless of which branch of law it belongs to, is Occurrence-oriented and is a Law of Occurrence. It is not a formal law consisting of formalities, but has a material content. The fact that different methods have been adopted in criminal procedure and in civil judgment, in terms of collecting case materials, does not mean that civil judgment has only a purpose of reaching the formal truth. The truth is one and the same for every judicial branch. As a result of criminal proceedings, the basis of the judges conscientious opinion regarding the proof of the act not generally constitute a mere substantive truth. It refers to a projection of the verb, which has predominantly material content, which is checked for compliance with the law within the framework of balancing the conflicting interests with the alleged commission of a crime. The substantive truth is the part of a lived event that the judge is convinced with justification and renders a judgment within the framework of the procedural rules that determine the legality of the evidence. In other words, it is the verdict. In a system where there are strict exclusion rules, the substantive truth rather expresses an appearance determined by these rules and has a predominantly normative content.

 The reasoning activity, regardless of which branch of law it belongs to, is Occurrence-oriented and is a Law of Occurrence. It is not a formal law consisting of formalities, but has a material content. The fact that different methods have been adopted in criminal procedure and in civil judgment, in terms of collecting case materials, does not mean that civil judgment has only a purpose of reaching the formal truth. The truth is one and the same for every judicial branch. As a result of criminal proceedings, the basis of the judges conscientious opinion regarding the proof of the act not generally constitute a mere substantive truth. It refers to a projection of the verb, which has predominantly material content, which is checked for compliance with the law within the framework of balancing the conflicting interests with the alleged commission of a crime. The substantive truth is the part of a lived event that the judge is convinced with justification and renders a judgment within the framework of the procedural rules that determine the legality of the evidence. In other words, it is the verdict. In a system where there are strict exclusion rules, the substantive truth rather expresses an appearance determined by these rules and has a predominantly normative content.

 Muhakeme faaliyeti, hangi hukuk dalına ait olduğu önemli olmaksızın bir oluşa yöneliktir ve bir Oluş Hukukudur. Formalitelerden meydana gelen bir şekil hukuku olmayıp, maddi içeriğe sahiptir. Ceza muhakemesi ile medenî muhakemede dâva malzemesinin toplanması bakımından farklı yöntemlerin benimsenmiş olması, medenî muhakemenin yalnızca şeklî gerçeğe ulaşmak gibi bir amacının olduğu anlamına gelmemektedir. Gerçek, her yargı kolu bakımından bir ve aynıdır. Ceza yargılaması sonucunda fiilin ispatına ilişkin olarak hâkimde oluşan vicdani kanaatin esasını, genellikle salt bir maddi gerçek oluşturmamaktadır. Maddi gerçek, fiilin bir suç işlendiği iddiasıyla çatışan menfaatlerin dengelenmesi çerçevesinde hukuka uygunluk denetiminden geçen, ağırlıklı olarak maddi içeriğe sahip bir izdüşümünü ifade etmektedir. Maddi gerçek, yaşanmış bir olayın delillerin hukuka uygunluğunu belirleyen usul kuralları çerçevesinde yargıcın gerekçeli olarak ikna olduğu ve hüküm haline getirdiği kısmıdır. Başka bir ifadeyle, hükmidir. Katı dışlama kurallarının olduğu bir sistemde maddi gerçek, daha çok bu kuralların belirlediği bir görünümü ifade eder ve ağırlıklı olarak normatif içeriğe sahiptir.

Makale detayları

Matter Truth to Reach as One of the Objectives of Criminal Proceeding “Reaching material truth? Is the provision to establish a reality?”

Yazarlar:

N.A.

Yayıncı:

Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ceza Muhakemeleri Usulü

Dergi:

Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.18 Issue 2, pp.962-999

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

10/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001303009

pISSN:

1306-3839

Substantive Truth

Reciprocity Theory

Consistency Theory

Mixed Theory

Conscientious OpinionMaddi Gerçek

Karşılıklılık Teorisi

Tutarlılık Teorisi

Karma Teori

Vicdani Kanaat

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: N.A.

Yayıncı: Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar: Ceza Muhakemeleri Usulü

Dergi: Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.18 Issue 2, pp.962-999

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 10/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001303009

pISSN: 1306-3839

Sayı

Yazarlar:

N.A.

Yayıncı:

Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ceza Muhakemeleri Usulü

Dergi:

Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.18 Issue 2, pp.962-999

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

10/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001303009

pISSN:

1306-3839