Quṭb al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī’s Criticism of Rational Philosophy and Peripatetic Definition Theory: : An Analy-sis within the Con-text of Şarh Ḥikmat al-Ishrāq

Adem Evmeş

Makale detayları

Quṭb al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī’s Criticism of Rational Philosophy and Peripatetic Definition Theory: : An Analy-sis within the Con-text of Şarh Ḥikmat al-Ishrāq

Yazarlar:

Adem Evmeş

Yayıncı:

Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University

Dergi:

Dergiabant Vol.11 Issue 1, pp.168-179

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001290535

pISSN:

2148-0494

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The aim of this study is to examine the criticisms of rational philosophy and Peripatetic definition theory. al-Shīrāzī who lived during the 14th century attracts attention with his illuminative attitude by both writing an annotation to Suhrawardīs work and writing independent Works. al-Shīrāzī criticizes Ibn Sīnās theory of description and stresses that it is hard for description to comprise of common constituent elements, namely the sum of types and distinctive constituent elements. The present study will primarily try to discuss al-Shīrāzīs criticism of Ibn Sīnā in the preface of his annotation to Ḥikmat al-Ishrāq, as well as damages to the aforementioned philosophy and resources of illuminative philosophy Then examine the criticism toward Ibn Sīnās theory of description regarding al-Shīrāzīs description. Considering the data acquired, the study aims to reveal al-Shīrāzīs illuminative perception and examine the resources of criticism and solution offers generated.

 The aim of this study is to examine the criticisms of rational philosophy and Peripatetic definition theory. al-Shīrāzī who lived during the 14th century attracts attention with his illuminative attitude by both writing an annotation to Suhrawardīs work and writing independent Works. al-Shīrāzī criticizes Ibn Sīnās theory of description and stresses that it is hard for description to comprise of common constituent elements, namely the sum of types and distinctive constituent elements. The present study will primarily try to discuss al-Shīrāzīs criticism of Ibn Sīnā in the preface of his annotation to Ḥikmat al-Ishrāq, as well as damages to the aforementioned philosophy and resources of illuminative philosophy Then examine the criticism toward Ibn Sīnās theory of description regarding al-Shīrāzīs description. Considering the data acquired, the study aims to reveal al-Shīrāzīs illuminative perception and examine the resources of criticism and solution offers generated.

 The aim of this study is to examine the criticisms of rational philosophy and Peripatetic definition theory. al-Shīrāzī who lived during the 14th century attracts attention with his illuminative attitude by both writing an annotation to Suhrawardīs work and writing independent Works. al-Shīrāzī criticizes Ibn Sīnās theory of description and stresses that it is hard for description to comprise of common constituent elements, namely the sum of types and distinctive constituent elements. The present study will primarily try to discuss al-Shīrāzīs criticism of Ibn Sīnā in the preface of his annotation to Ḥikmat al-Ishrāq, as well as damages to the aforementioned philosophy and resources of illuminative philosophy Then examine the criticism toward Ibn Sīnās theory of description regarding al-Shīrāzīs description. Considering the data acquired, the study aims to reveal al-Shīrāzīs illuminative perception and examine the resources of criticism and solution offers generated.

 Bu çalışmanın amacı, Kutbuddin eş-Şirâzînin akılcı felsefeye ve Meşşâî tanım teorisine yönelik eleştirileri incelemektir. İşrâk felsefesi söz konusu olduğunda akla gelen ilk isimlerden biri Kutbuddin eş-Şirâzîdir. Bu bağlamda 14. yüzyılda yaşamış olan Şirâzî, hem Sühreverdînin eserine şerh yazarak hem de müstakil eserler kaleme alarak İşrâkî tavrıyla dikkat çekmektedir. Bu anlamda İşrâkî tavırla ilgili en açık ifadeleri Hikmetül-işrâka yazdığı şerhte rastlamak mümkündür. Şirâzî, İbn Sînânın tarif teorisine eleştiriler yönelterek tanımın; ortak kurucu unsurlardan yani cins ve ayırt edici kurucu unsurların toplamından meydana gelmesinin zor olduğunu belirtir. Biz bu çalışmada öncelikle Şirâzînin Hikmetül-işrâka yazdığı şerhinin mukaddimesinde yer alan İbn Sînâya yönelik eleştirilerini, bahsî hikmete zarar verdikleri görüşünü ve İşrâk felsefesinin kaynaklarını ele almaya çalışacağız. Daha sonra Şirâzînin tarif konusunda İbn Sînâcı tarif teorisine yönelik eleştirilerin inceleyeceğiz. Elde ettiğimiz bilgilerden hareketle de, Şirâzînin İşrâkîlik tasavvurunu ortaya koymaya, eleştirilerinin kaynağını ve getirdiği çözüm önerileri ele alınacaktır.

Makale detayları

Quṭb al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī’s Criticism of Rational Philosophy and Peripatetic Definition Theory: : An Analy-sis within the Con-text of Şarh Ḥikmat al-Ishrāq

Yazarlar:

Adem Evmeş

Yayıncı:

Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University

Dergi:

Dergiabant Vol.11 Issue 1, pp.168-179

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001290535

pISSN:

2148-0494

Logic

Quṭb al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī

Suhrawardī

Enlightenment Philosophy

CriticismMantık

Kutbuddin eş-Şirâzî

Sühreverdî

İşrâk Felsefesi

Eleştiri

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Adem Evmeş

Yayıncı: Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University

Dergi: Dergiabant Vol.11 Issue 1, pp.168-179

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 5/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001290535

pISSN: 2148-0494

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Adem Evmeş

Yayıncı:

Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University

Dergi:

Dergiabant Vol.11 Issue 1, pp.168-179

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001290535

pISSN:

2148-0494