EVALUATION OF THE DECISIONS TAKEN BY A PROVINCIAL SANITARY BOARD IN THE FIRST TWO YEARS OF THE PANDEMIC PERIOD

Çiğdem Cerit; Ahmet Önder Porsuk

Makale detayları

EVALUATION OF THE DECISIONS TAKEN BY A PROVINCIAL SANITARY BOARD IN THE FIRST TWO YEARS OF THE PANDEMIC PERIOD

Yazarlar:

Çiğdem Cerit | Ahmet Önder Porsuk

Yayıncı:

Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Dergi:

Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi Vol.26 Issue 2, pp.353-362

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001294508

pISSN:

2148-9041

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The aim of this study was to examine the decisions of a provincial sanitary board in the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this descriptive study, we analyzed the decisions taken by a provincial sanitary board according to health legislation, which were published as publicly available data. Decisions were classified according to whether they imposed or lifted bans, whether they were directed at individuals or institutions, whether they were made with central instruction. It was determined that 232 96.6 of the 240 decisions analyzed were COVID-19-related decisions, and 68.1 n158 of these decisions were taken in 2020.It was observed that a decision contained an average of 4.364.96 items. It was found that 71.6 n166 of the resolutions were adopted for the first time, 62.5 n145 contained recommendations, 92.7 n215 contained items for individuals, and 66.8 n155 contained items for institutions. It was observed that 36 n84 of the decisions were taken according to without a central instruction. The important finding of our study is that the highest number of decisions in the province were taken in the months before the peak of cases in Turkey. This shows that there is foresight in the decisions taken and thus the importance of taking measures at the local level by reacting before the central authority. The importance of the guidance and persuasive role of sanitation committees in combating extraordinary health problems is once again demonstrated by this study.

 The aim of this study was to examine the decisions of a provincial sanitary board in the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this descriptive study, we analyzed the decisions taken by a provincial sanitary board according to health legislation, which were published as publicly available data. Decisions were classified according to whether they imposed or lifted bans, whether they were directed at individuals or institutions, whether they were made with central instruction. It was determined that 232 96.6 of the 240 decisions analyzed were COVID-19-related decisions, and 68.1 n158 of these decisions were taken in 2020.It was observed that a decision contained an average of 4.364.96 items. It was found that 71.6 n166 of the resolutions were adopted for the first time, 62.5 n145 contained recommendations, 92.7 n215 contained items for individuals, and 66.8 n155 contained items for institutions. It was observed that 36 n84 of the decisions were taken according to without a central instruction. The important finding of our study is that the highest number of decisions in the province were taken in the months before the peak of cases in Turkey. This shows that there is foresight in the decisions taken and thus the importance of taking measures at the local level by reacting before the central authority. The importance of the guidance and persuasive role of sanitation committees in combating extraordinary health problems is once again demonstrated by this study.

 The aim of this study was to examine the decisions of a provincial sanitary board in the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this descriptive study, we analyzed the decisions taken by a provincial sanitary board according to health legislation, which were published as publicly available data. Decisions were classified according to whether they imposed or lifted bans, whether they were directed at individuals or institutions, whether they were made with central instruction. It was determined that 232 96.6 of the 240 decisions analyzed were COVID-19-related decisions, and 68.1 n158 of these decisions were taken in 2020.It was observed that a decision contained an average of 4.364.96 items. It was found that 71.6 n166 of the resolutions were adopted for the first time, 62.5 n145 contained recommendations, 92.7 n215 contained items for individuals, and 66.8 n155 contained items for institutions. It was observed that 36 n84 of the decisions were taken according to without a central instruction. The important finding of our study is that the highest number of decisions in the province were taken in the months before the peak of cases in Turkey. This shows that there is foresight in the decisions taken and thus the importance of taking measures at the local level by reacting before the central authority. The importance of the guidance and persuasive role of sanitation committees in combating extraordinary health problems is once again demonstrated by this study.

 Bu çalışma ile COVID-19 pandemisinin ilk iki yılında bir ilde alınan hıfzıssıhha kurulu kararlarının incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu tanımlayıcı çalışmada, bir il hıfzıssıhha kurulunca sağlık mevzuatına göre alınan, kamuya açık veri olarak yayınlanan kararlar incelenmiştir. Kararlar yasaklama getirmesi ya da bunların kaldırılması, bireylere veya kurumlara yönelik olması, merkezi talimatlarla alınması gibi özellikleri bakımından sınıflandırılmıştır. İncelenen 240 kararın 232sinin 96,6 COVID-19 ile ilgili karar olduğu, bu kararların 68,1inin n158 2020 yılında alındığı belirlenmiştir. Bir kararın ortalama 4.364.96 sayıda madde içerdiği görülmüştür. Kararların 71,6sının n166 ilk kez alındığı, 62,5inin n145 tavsiye içerdiği, 92,7sinin n215 bireylere yönelik, 66,8inin n155 kurumlara yönelik maddeler içerdiği saptanmıştır. Kararların 36sının n84 merkezi bir talimat olmaksızın alındığı görülmüştür. Çalışmamızın önemli bir bulgusu, ilde en fazla sayıda kararın Türkiyedeki vakaların en yüksek noktaya ulaşmadan önceki aylarda alınmış olmasıdır. Alınan kararlarda bir öngörü olduğunu ve böylece merkezi otoriteden önce reaksiyon göstererek, yerel düzeyde önlemler alınmasının önemi gösterilmiştir. Olağanüstü sağlık sorunlarıyla mücadelede hıfzıssıhha kurullarının rehberlik ve ikna edicilik gibi rollerinin önemi bu çalışmayla bir kez daha ortaya konulmuştur.

Makale detayları

EVALUATION OF THE DECISIONS TAKEN BY A PROVINCIAL SANITARY BOARD IN THE FIRST TWO YEARS OF THE PANDEMIC PERIOD

Yazarlar:

Çiğdem Cerit | Ahmet Önder Porsuk

Yayıncı:

Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Dergi:

Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi Vol.26 Issue 2, pp.353-362

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001294508

pISSN:

2148-9041

COVID 19

pandemic

provincial sanitary board

quarantine

public healthCOVID 19

pandemi

il hıfzıssıhha kurulu

karantina

halk sağlığı

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Çiğdem Cerit | Ahmet Önder Porsuk

Yayıncı: Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar: Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Dergi: Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi Vol.26 Issue 2, pp.353-362

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001294508

pISSN: 2148-9041

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Çiğdem Cerit | Ahmet Önder Porsuk

Yayıncı:

Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Dergi:

Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi Vol.26 Issue 2, pp.353-362

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001294508

pISSN:

2148-9041