Hostility as a Reason for Reversal in Full Remedy Action

Zehra Karakuş Işık

Makale detayları

Hostility as a Reason for Reversal in Full Remedy Action

Yazarlar:

Zehra Karakuş Işık

Yayıncı:

Anadolu University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Anadolu Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.9 Issue 2, pp.333-349

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001296556

pISSN:

2687-394X

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 For the damage caused by an administrative action and administrative act to be fully and promptly compensated, it is necessary to determine the correct defendant. The status of being a defendant is expressed with the concept of hostility in Law No. 2577. If the court reveals that the defendant authority was incorrectly determined during the initial examination phase or while the case is pending, it determines the real defendant authority and decides to serve the petition to the relevant authority. Thus, the right to claim and defense of the authority that carries out the damaging administrative action or administrative act are protected. When it is determined at the stage of legal remedies that the hostility is directed to the wrong authority, the decision is reversed, and file is sent to the court that has made the decision for re-decision. Since the restart of the trial will prolong the process of reaching a verdict, it is necessary to know the criteria used by the Council of State regarding hostility. This study aims to clarify the criteria used by the Council of State in determining the defendant authority in full remedy cases from administrative action by providing examples from judicial decisions.

 For the damage caused by an administrative action and administrative act to be fully and promptly compensated, it is necessary to determine the correct defendant. The status of being a defendant is expressed with the concept of hostility in Law No. 2577. If the court reveals that the defendant authority was incorrectly determined during the initial examination phase or while the case is pending, it determines the real defendant authority and decides to serve the petition to the relevant authority. Thus, the right to claim and defense of the authority that carries out the damaging administrative action or administrative act are protected. When it is determined at the stage of legal remedies that the hostility is directed to the wrong authority, the decision is reversed, and file is sent to the court that has made the decision for re-decision. Since the restart of the trial will prolong the process of reaching a verdict, it is necessary to know the criteria used by the Council of State regarding hostility. This study aims to clarify the criteria used by the Council of State in determining the defendant authority in full remedy cases from administrative action by providing examples from judicial decisions.

 For the damage caused by an administrative action and administrative act to be fully and promptly compensated, it is necessary to determine the correct defendant. The status of being a defendant is expressed with the concept of hostility in Law No. 2577. If the court reveals that the defendant authority was incorrectly determined during the initial examination phase or while the case is pending, it determines the real defendant authority and decides to serve the petition to the relevant authority. Thus, the right to claim and defense of the authority that carries out the damaging administrative action or administrative act are protected. When it is determined at the stage of legal remedies that the hostility is directed to the wrong authority, the decision is reversed, and file is sent to the court that has made the decision for re-decision. Since the restart of the trial will prolong the process of reaching a verdict, it is necessary to know the criteria used by the Council of State regarding hostility. This study aims to clarify the criteria used by the Council of State in determining the defendant authority in full remedy cases from administrative action by providing examples from judicial decisions.

 İdari eylem ve idari işlemden kaynaklanan zararın tam ve zamanında karşılanabilmesi için davalı tarafın doğru belirlenmesi gerekir. İdari yargıda davalı, idaredir. 2577 sayılı Kanunda davalı olabilme durumu, husumet kavramı ile ifade edilir. Mahkeme ilk inceleme aşamasında veya dava devam ederken davalı makamın yanlış belirlendiğini tespit ederse gerçek davalı makamı belirler ve dava dilekçesinin ilgili makama tebliğ edilmesine karar verir. Böylece zarar veren idari eylemi veya işlemi gerçekleştiren makamın iddia ve savunma hakkı korunmuş olur. Husumetin yanlış makama yöneltildiği kanun yolları aşamasında tespit edildiğinde ise kararın bozulmasına ve dosyanın yeniden karar verilmek üzere ilgili mahkemeye gönderilmesine karar verilir. Yargılamanın yeniden başlayacak olması davanın karara bağlanma sürecini uzatacağı için husumete ilişkin Danıştayın kullandığı ölçütlerin bilinmesi gerekir. Bu çalışmayla yargı kararlarından örnekler verilmek suretiyle Danıştayın idari eylemden kaynaklanan tam yargı davalarında davalı makamı belirlerken kullanmış olduğu ölçütlere açıklık getirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.

Makale detayları

Hostility as a Reason for Reversal in Full Remedy Action

Yazarlar:

Zehra Karakuş Işık

Yayıncı:

Anadolu University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Anadolu Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.9 Issue 2, pp.333-349

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001296556

pISSN:

2687-394X

Full Remedy Action

Initial Examination

Hostility

Legal Remedies

Decision of ReversalTam Yargı Davası

İlk İnceleme

Husumet

Kanun Yolları

Bozma Kararı

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Zehra Karakuş Işık

Yayıncı: Anadolu University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk

Dergi: Anadolu Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.9 Issue 2, pp.333-349

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 7/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001296556

pISSN: 2687-394X

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Zehra Karakuş Işık

Yayıncı:

Anadolu University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Anadolu Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.9 Issue 2, pp.333-349

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001296556

pISSN:

2687-394X