HOW RELIABLE IS THE AMOUNT OF INTERPROXIMAL REDUCTION CLINCHECK SOFTWARE RECOMMENDS?

Yasemin Tunca; Nihal Fahrzadeh; Murat Tunca

Makale detayları

HOW RELIABLE IS THE AMOUNT OF INTERPROXIMAL REDUCTION CLINCHECK SOFTWARE RECOMMENDS?

Yazarlar:

Yasemin Tunca | Nihal Fahrzadeh | Murat Tunca

Yayıncı:

Aydin Adnan Menderes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Dentistry (Other)

Dergi:

Meandros Medical And Dental Journal Vol.25 Issue 4, pp.481-491

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001334518

pISSN:

2149-9063

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the reliability of Bolton analysis results obtained with ClinCheck software and the interproximal reduction IPR ratios the software recommends. Materials Methods: From the Invisalign clear aligner system database, 120 individuals were divided into three groups according to Angle classification: dental class I n43, dental class II n49, and dental class III n28 malocclusions. The Bolton analysis data and the IPR amounts determined by Align Technologys digital treatment planning interface, ClinCheck, were evaluated separately for the maxilla and mandible for each individual. A discrepancy was defined as the condition in which the Bolton ratio the software determined and the suggested IPR amount for the anterior ratio and the overall ratio exceeded 2 mm. The average anterior Bolton ratio and suggested anterior Bolton ratio, along with the total Bolton ratio and suggested total Bolton ratio for all individuals, were compared using Cronbachs alpha. Results: It was determined that the average suggested anterior Bolton ratio for individuals with class I malocclusion was higher than that for individuals with other malocclusions p0.008. Cronbachs alpha for the anterior Bolton ratio and the suggested anterior Bolton ratio was 0.131 whereas the overall ratio and the suggested overall Bolton ratio value were determined to be 0.41. Both values are defined as indicating weak reliability. Conclusion: A weak reliability relationship was detected between the Bolton values obtained with the ClinCheck software and the IPR suggestions provided in treatment planning.

 Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the reliability of Bolton analysis results obtained with ClinCheck software and the interproximal reduction IPR ratios the software recommends. Materials Methods: From the Invisalign clear aligner system database, 120 individuals were divided into three groups according to Angle classification: dental class I n43, dental class II n49, and dental class III n28 malocclusions. The Bolton analysis data and the IPR amounts determined by Align Technologys digital treatment planning interface, ClinCheck, were evaluated separately for the maxilla and mandible for each individual. A discrepancy was defined as the condition in which the Bolton ratio the software determined and the suggested IPR amount for the anterior ratio and the overall ratio exceeded 2 mm. The average anterior Bolton ratio and suggested anterior Bolton ratio, along with the total Bolton ratio and suggested total Bolton ratio for all individuals, were compared using Cronbachs alpha. Results: It was determined that the average suggested anterior Bolton ratio for individuals with class I malocclusion was higher than that for individuals with other malocclusions p0.008. Cronbachs alpha for the anterior Bolton ratio and the suggested anterior Bolton ratio was 0.131 whereas the overall ratio and the suggested overall Bolton ratio value were determined to be 0.41. Both values are defined as indicating weak reliability. Conclusion: A weak reliability relationship was detected between the Bolton values obtained with the ClinCheck software and the IPR suggestions provided in treatment planning.

 Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the reliability of Bolton analysis results obtained with ClinCheck software and the interproximal reduction IPR ratios the software recommends. Materials Methods: From the Invisalign clear aligner system database, 120 individuals were divided into three groups according to Angle classification: dental class I n43, dental class II n49, and dental class III n28 malocclusions. The Bolton analysis data and the IPR amounts determined by Align Technologys digital treatment planning interface, ClinCheck, were evaluated separately for the maxilla and mandible for each individual. A discrepancy was defined as the condition in which the Bolton ratio the software determined and the suggested IPR amount for the anterior ratio and the overall ratio exceeded 2 mm. The average anterior Bolton ratio and suggested anterior Bolton ratio, along with the total Bolton ratio and suggested total Bolton ratio for all individuals, were compared using Cronbachs alpha. Results: It was determined that the average suggested anterior Bolton ratio for individuals with class I malocclusion was higher than that for individuals with other malocclusions p0.008. Cronbachs alpha for the anterior Bolton ratio and the suggested anterior Bolton ratio was 0.131 whereas the overall ratio and the suggested overall Bolton ratio value were determined to be 0.41. Both values are defined as indicating weak reliability. Conclusion: A weak reliability relationship was detected between the Bolton values obtained with the ClinCheck software and the IPR suggestions provided in treatment planning.

 Amaç: Bu çalışma ClinCheck yazılımı ile elde edilen Bolton analiz sonuçlarının ve yazılımın önerdiği interproksimal reduksiyon IPR oranlarının guvenilirliğini değerlendirmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Materyal ve Metod: Invisalign şeffaf plak sistemi veri tabanından 120 birey Angle sınıflamasına göre uç gruba ayrılmıştır: dental sınıf I n43, dental sınıf II n49 ve dental sınıf III n28 malokluzyonlar. Bolton analiz verileri ve Align Technologynin dijital tedavi planlama arayuzu ClinCheck tarafından belirlenen IPR miktarları her birey için maksilla ve mandibula için ayrı ayrı değerlendirilmiştir. Uyuşmazlık, yazılımın belirlediği Bolton oranı ile anterior oran ve genel oran için önerilen IPR miktarının 2 mmyi aştığı durum olarak tanımlanmıştır. Tum bireyler için ortalama anterior Bolton oranı ve önerilen anterior Bolton oranı ile toplam Bolton oranı ve önerilen toplam Bolton oranı Cronbachs alpha kullanılarak karşılaştırılmıştır. Bulgular: Sınıf I malokluzyona sahip bireyler için önerilen anterior Bolton oranı ortalamasının Ortalama:0.18, sınıf II malokluzyona Ortalama: 0.00 ve sınıf III malokluzyona Ortalama: 0.00 sahip bireylere göre daha yuksek olduğu tespit edilmiştir p0.008. Anterior Bolton oranı ve önerilen anterior Bolton oranı için Cronbach alfa değeri 0,131 iken, genel oran ve önerilen genel Bolton oranı değeri 0,41 olarak belirlenmiştir. Her iki değer de zayıf guvenilirlik göstergesi olarak tanımlanmıştır. Sonuç: ClinCheck yazılımı ile elde edilen Bolton değerleri ile tedavi planlamasında sunulan IPR önerileri arasında zayıf bir guvenilirlik ilişkisi tespit edilmiştir.

Makale detayları

HOW RELIABLE IS THE AMOUNT OF INTERPROXIMAL REDUCTION CLINCHECK SOFTWARE RECOMMENDS?

Yazarlar:

Yasemin Tunca | Nihal Fahrzadeh | Murat Tunca

Yayıncı:

Aydin Adnan Menderes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Dentistry (Other)

Dergi:

Meandros Medical And Dental Journal Vol.25 Issue 4, pp.481-491

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001334518

pISSN:

2149-9063

Invisalign

clincheck

interproximal reduction

boltonInvisalign

clincheck yazılımı

interproksimal redüksiyon

bolton

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Yasemin Tunca | Nihal Fahrzadeh | Murat Tunca

Yayıncı: Aydin Adnan Menderes University

Ana Başlıklar: Dentistry (Other)

Dergi: Meandros Medical And Dental Journal Vol.25 Issue 4, pp.481-491

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 12/2024

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001334518

pISSN: 2149-9063

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Yasemin Tunca | Nihal Fahrzadeh | Murat Tunca

Yayıncı:

Aydin Adnan Menderes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Dentistry (Other)

Dergi:

Meandros Medical And Dental Journal Vol.25 Issue 4, pp.481-491

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001334518

pISSN:

2149-9063