Legal Teleology

Muzaffer Dülger

Makale detayları

Legal Teleology

Yazarlar:

Muzaffer Dülger

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.11 Issue 1, pp.495-518

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001287936

pISSN:

2147-768X

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Teleological thought comprehends every object, life form, natural or institutional mechanism, including human beings and the law, as a being has an ultimate purpose in existing. So teleological method of thinking explains every phenomena in terms of the ultimate purpose it serve, rather than of the cause by which it arise. While the second philosophical question is well known arkhe question, but the first one is about telos. There is also an important tradition of thought has a teleological point of view in legal philosophy; and this study is allocated to analyzing this viewpoint consisting of many legal philosophers, from classical philosophers to modern thinkers like Jhering, Pound, Radbruch and Fuller. Some impotant concetual outcomes have emerged from these philosophers teleological discussions. Justice, legal security and practical aim are three prominent concepts within this context. The antinomical correlations and natures of these three concepts have constituted main themes of these teleological discussions which also some Turkish legal thinkers like Çobanoğlu, Aral and Çağıl participated in. In this study, we will try to analyze the teleological antinomy, and to point out the philosophical and jursiprudential expansions of this subject, by means of these studies above-cited.

 Teleological thought comprehends every object, life form, natural or institutional mechanism, including human beings and the law, as a being has an ultimate purpose in existing. So teleological method of thinking explains every phenomena in terms of the ultimate purpose it serve, rather than of the cause by which it arise. While the second philosophical question is well known arkhe question, but the first one is about telos. There is also an important tradition of thought has a teleological point of view in legal philosophy; and this study is allocated to analyzing this viewpoint consisting of many legal philosophers, from classical philosophers to modern thinkers like Jhering, Pound, Radbruch and Fuller. Some impotant concetual outcomes have emerged from these philosophers teleological discussions. Justice, legal security and practical aim are three prominent concepts within this context. The antinomical correlations and natures of these three concepts have constituted main themes of these teleological discussions which also some Turkish legal thinkers like Çobanoğlu, Aral and Çağıl participated in. In this study, we will try to analyze the teleological antinomy, and to point out the philosophical and jursiprudential expansions of this subject, by means of these studies above-cited.

 Teleological thought comprehends every object, life form, natural or institutional mechanism, including human beings and the law, as a being has an ultimate purpose in existing. So teleological method of thinking explains every phenomena in terms of the ultimate purpose it serve, rather than of the cause by which it arise. While the second philosophical question is well known arkhe question, but the first one is about telos. There is also an important tradition of thought has a teleological point of view in legal philosophy; and this study is allocated to analyzing this viewpoint consisting of many legal philosophers, from classical philosophers to modern thinkers like Jhering, Pound, Radbruch and Fuller. Some impotant concetual outcomes have emerged from these philosophers teleological discussions. Justice, legal security and practical aim are three prominent concepts within this context. The antinomical correlations and natures of these three concepts have constituted main themes of these teleological discussions which also some Turkish legal thinkers like Çobanoğlu, Aral and Çağıl participated in. In this study, we will try to analyze the teleological antinomy, and to point out the philosophical and jursiprudential expansions of this subject, by means of these studies above-cited.

 Teleolojik düşünce, her nesneyi, yaşam formunu, doğal veya kurumsal mekanizmayı, insan ve hukuk da dahil olmak üzere, varoluşundan gelen bir hedefe sahip varlık olarak kavrar. Bu şekliyle teleolojik düşünme yöntemi de her fenomeni, ortaya çıktığı sebebe bağlı değil, hizmet ettiği nihai hedefe göre açıklar. Bu konuda ilk sorunsal ünlü arkhe sorusunu meydana getirirken, ikinci soru telos hakkındadır. Hukuk felsefesi alanında da teleolojik bakış açısına sahip önemli bir düşünce geleneği bulunmaktadır ve bu çalışma, klasik filozoflardan başlayarak Jhering, Pound, Radbruch ve Fullera dek pek çok modern düşünürün içinde bulunduğu bu bakış açısının analizine özgülenmiştir. Bu filozofların teleolojik tartışmalarından bazı önemli kavramsal çıktılar sudur etmiştir. Adalet, hukuk güvenliği ve pratik amaç, bu bağlamda öne çıkan üç kavramdır. Bu üç kavramın çatışkılı ilişkileri ve doğaları, Çobanoğlu, Aral ve Çağıl gibi bazı Türk hukuk düşünürlerinin de katılmış olduğu bu teleoloji tartışmalarının ana temasını meydana getirmiştir. Bu çalışmada bizler işbu çalışmalar vasıtasıyla, teleolojik çatışkıyı analiz etmeye ve bu konunun felsefi ve hukukbilimsel açılımlarına işaret etmeye çalışacağız.

Makale detayları

Legal Teleology

Yazarlar:

Muzaffer Dülger

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.11 Issue 1, pp.495-518

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001287936

pISSN:

2147-768X

Teleology

Çobanoğlu

Radbruch

Fuller

Justice

Legal Security

Practical AimTeleoloji

Radbruch

Çobanoğlu

Fuller

Adalet

Pratik Amaç

Hukuk Güvenliği

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Muzaffer Dülger

Yayıncı: Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk

Dergi: Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.11 Issue 1, pp.495-518

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 8/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001287936

pISSN: 2147-768X

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Muzaffer Dülger

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.11 Issue 1, pp.495-518

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001287936

pISSN:

2147-768X