The Right to Effective Remedy for Alleged Violations of the Rights of People Held Under Administrative Detention: Two Different Judgements of the Court of Jurisdictional Disputes and the Constitutional Court

Esra Yılmaz Eren; Eyüp Kaan Demirkıran

Makale detayları

The Right to Effective Remedy for Alleged Violations of the Rights of People Held Under Administrative Detention: Two Different Judgements of the Court of Jurisdictional Disputes and the Constitutional Court

Yazarlar:

Esra Yılmaz Eren | Eyüp Kaan Demirkıran

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.12 Issue 1, pp.17-46

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001314710

pISSN:

2147-768X

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Administrative detention is frequently used by states when examining applications for international protection or in deportation proceedings. An analysis of case law shows that persons held in administrative detention are sometimes subject to various violations of the prohibition of torture and ill-treatment. On the other hand, there is a lack of clarity in Turkish law regarding the legal remedies available to persons in administrative detention against violations of their rights in relation to their detention conditions. This deficiency, which has also been recognised by the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court, has been attempted to be remedied by the case law of the Constitutional Court. There are, however, no concrete cases indicating that the administrative remedy identified by the Court provides a solution to the problems in practice, in other words, that it is an effective remedy. While the Constitutional Courts jurisprudence on the matter continues, the Streitgerichtshof has ruled that judicial justice has jurisdiction over the same matter, and the uncertainty regarding the remedy mechanism in domestic law has become even apparent. This study analyzes the conditions of administrative detention in the context of the prohibition of torture and ill-treatment and examines the case law challenging these conditions in national law. In this context, by comparatively evaluating the decisions of the ECHR, the CC, and the Court of Jurisdictional Disputes, it is argued that the legal loophole in contesting the conditions of administrative detention constitutes a violation of the right to effective remedy and suggestions for solutions to eliminate this violation are presented.

 Administrative detention is frequently used by states when examining applications for international protection or in deportation proceedings. An analysis of case law shows that persons held in administrative detention are sometimes subject to various violations of the prohibition of torture and ill-treatment. On the other hand, there is a lack of clarity in Turkish law regarding the legal remedies available to persons in administrative detention against violations of their rights in relation to their detention conditions. This deficiency, which has also been recognised by the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court, has been attempted to be remedied by the case law of the Constitutional Court. There are, however, no concrete cases indicating that the administrative remedy identified by the Court provides a solution to the problems in practice, in other words, that it is an effective remedy. While the Constitutional Courts jurisprudence on the matter continues, the Streitgerichtshof has ruled that judicial justice has jurisdiction over the same matter, and the uncertainty regarding the remedy mechanism in domestic law has become even apparent. This study analyzes the conditions of administrative detention in the context of the prohibition of torture and ill-treatment and examines the case law challenging these conditions in national law. In this context, by comparatively evaluating the decisions of the ECHR, the CC, and the Court of Jurisdictional Disputes, it is argued that the legal loophole in contesting the conditions of administrative detention constitutes a violation of the right to effective remedy and suggestions for solutions to eliminate this violation are presented.

 Administrative detention is frequently used by states when examining applications for international protection or in deportation proceedings. An analysis of case law shows that persons held in administrative detention are sometimes subject to various violations of the prohibition of torture and ill-treatment. On the other hand, there is a lack of clarity in Turkish law regarding the legal remedies available to persons in administrative detention against violations of their rights in relation to their detention conditions. This deficiency, which has also been recognised by the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court, has been attempted to be remedied by the case law of the Constitutional Court. There are, however, no concrete cases indicating that the administrative remedy identified by the Court provides a solution to the problems in practice, in other words, that it is an effective remedy. While the Constitutional Courts jurisprudence on the matter continues, the Streitgerichtshof has ruled that judicial justice has jurisdiction over the same matter, and the uncertainty regarding the remedy mechanism in domestic law has become even apparent. This study analyzes the conditions of administrative detention in the context of the prohibition of torture and ill-treatment and examines the case law challenging these conditions in national law. In this context, by comparatively evaluating the decisions of the ECHR, the CC, and the Court of Jurisdictional Disputes, it is argued that the legal loophole in contesting the conditions of administrative detention constitutes a violation of the right to effective remedy and suggestions for solutions to eliminate this violation are presented.

 İdari gözetim, uluslararası koruma başvurularının değerlendirilmesi veya sınırdışı etme işlemleri sürecinde devletler tarafından sıklıkla uygulanmaktadır. İçtihatlar incelendiğinde idari gözetim altında tutulan kişilerin zaman zaman işkence ve kötü muamele yasağı kapsamında çeşitli ihlâllerle karşılaştıkları görülmektedir. Buna karşın Türk Hukuku bakımından idari gözetim altında tutulan kişilerin tutulma koşulları bağlamında yaşadıkları hak ihlâllerine karşı başvurabilecekleri hukuki yollar konusunda bir belirsizlik göze çarpmaktadır. Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi ve Anayasa Mahkemesi tarafından da dile getirilen bu eksiklik, Anayasa Mahkemesinin içtihadı ile giderilmeye çalışılmıştır. Ancak Mahkeme tarafından işaret edilen idari yargı yolunun uygulamada sorunlara çözüm oluşturduğuna, başka bir deyişle etkili bir başvuru yolu teşkil ettiğine dair somut davalar bulunmamaktadır. Ayrıca Anayasa Mahkemesinin idari yargının etkili bir başvuru yolu olduğuna ilişkin içtihadı devam ederken aynı hususta Uyuşmazlık Mahkemesinin adli yargının görevli olduğuna hükmetmesiyle iç hukuktaki başvuru mekanizmasına ilişkin belirsizlik daha belirgin hale gelmiştir. Bu çalışma kapsamında işkence ve kötü muamele yasağı kapsamında idari gözetim koşulları ele alınarak, bu koşulların iç hukukta dava edilmesine ilişkin içtihatlar incelenmiştir. Bu bağlamda Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi, Anayasa Mahkemesi ve Uyuşmazlık Mahkemesi kararları karşılaştırmalı olarak değerlendirilerek, idari gözetim koşullarının dava edilmesine yönelik hukuki boşluğun etkili başvuru hakkı kapsamında ihlâl teşkil ettiği ileri sürülmekte ve bu ihlâlin ortadan kaldırılmasına yönelik çözüm önerileri sunulmaktadır.

Makale detayları

The Right to Effective Remedy for Alleged Violations of the Rights of People Held Under Administrative Detention: Two Different Judgements of the Court of Jurisdictional Disputes and the Constitutional Court

Yazarlar:

Esra Yılmaz Eren | Eyüp Kaan Demirkıran

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.12 Issue 1, pp.17-46

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001314710

pISSN:

2147-768X

Administrative Detention

Conditions of Administrative Detention

Full Remedy

Right to an Effective Remedy

Prohibition of Torture and İll-Treatmentİdari Gözetim

İdari Gözetim Koşulları

Tam Yargı Davası

Etkili Başvuru Hakkı

İşkence ve Kötü Muamele Yasağı

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Esra Yılmaz Eren | Eyüp Kaan Demirkıran

Yayıncı: Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi: Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.12 Issue 1, pp.17-46

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 7/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001314710

pISSN: 2147-768X

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Esra Yılmaz Eren | Eyüp Kaan Demirkıran

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.12 Issue 1, pp.17-46

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001314710

pISSN:

2147-768X