Examination of Pelvis Diameters and Pelvis Types On 3D Computed Tomography Images

Simge Kucuk; Sidar Gedikoglu; Siyabend Civak; Suleyman Aslan; Sevval Ozkale; Sivan Bahceci; Siyar Balli; Taha Ibrahim Hasan Ozturk; Tutku Uykan; Tutku Berra Ozkoc; Ugur Ekin; Yekta Kercek; Ali Murat Koc; Sinan Bakirci

Makale detayları

Examination of Pelvis Diameters and Pelvis Types On 3D Computed Tomography Images

Yazarlar:

Simge Kucuk | Sidar Gedikoglu | Siyabend Civak | Suleyman Aslan | Sevval Ozkale | Sivan Bahceci | Siyar Balli | Taha Ibrahim Hasan Ozturk | Tutku Uykan | Tutku Berra Ozkoc | Ugur Ekin | Yekta Kercek | Ali Murat Koc | Sinan Bakirci

Yayıncı:

Izmir Katip Celebi University

Ana Başlıklar:

Radyoloji ve Organ Görüntüleme | Anatomi

Dergi:

Güncel Tıbbi Araştırmaları Dergisi Vol.4 Issue 3, pp.12-22

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001337914

pISSN:

2791-7061

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Objective: There are four main types of female pelvis: android, anthropoid, gynecoid, and platypelloid. The anatomical structure of certain pelvic types can make vaginal childbirth more difficult. Pelvic shape may also change slightly with age. Our study aimed to examine the distribution of pelvic types in women from two different age groups: young and old. Materials and methods: We analyzed 3D images of 100 women50 women aged 18-25 and 50 women aged 60-70created using the RadiAnt DICOM Viewer program. Pelvic diameters were measured, and pelvic types were classified. Results: Our analysis showed a clear predominance of platypelloid and gynecoid pelvic types compared to the anthropoid and android types. In the 18-25 age group, the gynecoid type was the most common, accounting for 48, while the android type was the least common at just 2. In the 60-70 age group, the platypelloid type was most prevalent, at 70, while the anthropoid type was not observed p  0.005. Conclusion: The platypelloid type was the most common pelvic type in our study, followed by the gynecoid type. Notably, the gynecoid type was less common in women aged 60-70, suggesting that age may have a significant impact on changes in pelvic anatomy.

 Objective: There are four main types of female pelvis: android, anthropoid, gynecoid, and platypelloid. The anatomical structure of certain pelvic types can make vaginal childbirth more difficult. Pelvic shape may also change slightly with age. Our study aimed to examine the distribution of pelvic types in women from two different age groups: young and old. Materials and methods: We analyzed 3D images of 100 women50 women aged 18-25 and 50 women aged 60-70created using the RadiAnt DICOM Viewer program. Pelvic diameters were measured, and pelvic types were classified. Results: Our analysis showed a clear predominance of platypelloid and gynecoid pelvic types compared to the anthropoid and android types. In the 18-25 age group, the gynecoid type was the most common, accounting for 48, while the android type was the least common at just 2. In the 60-70 age group, the platypelloid type was most prevalent, at 70, while the anthropoid type was not observed p  0.005. Conclusion: The platypelloid type was the most common pelvic type in our study, followed by the gynecoid type. Notably, the gynecoid type was less common in women aged 60-70, suggesting that age may have a significant impact on changes in pelvic anatomy.

 Objective: There are four main types of female pelvis: android, anthropoid, gynecoid, and platypelloid. The anatomical structure of certain pelvic types can make vaginal childbirth more difficult. Pelvic shape may also change slightly with age. Our study aimed to examine the distribution of pelvic types in women from two different age groups: young and old. Materials and methods: We analyzed 3D images of 100 women50 women aged 18-25 and 50 women aged 60-70created using the RadiAnt DICOM Viewer program. Pelvic diameters were measured, and pelvic types were classified. Results: Our analysis showed a clear predominance of platypelloid and gynecoid pelvic types compared to the anthropoid and android types. In the 18-25 age group, the gynecoid type was the most common, accounting for 48, while the android type was the least common at just 2. In the 60-70 age group, the platypelloid type was most prevalent, at 70, while the anthropoid type was not observed p  0.005. Conclusion: The platypelloid type was the most common pelvic type in our study, followed by the gynecoid type. Notably, the gynecoid type was less common in women aged 60-70, suggesting that age may have a significant impact on changes in pelvic anatomy.

 Amaç: Kadın pelvisinin android, anthropoid, gynecoid ve platypelloid olmak üzere temelde dört farklı tipi vardır. Bu pelvis tiplerinden bazılarının anatomik yapısı normal vajinal doğumun gerçekleşmesini zorlaştırır. Pelvisin şekilsel özellikleri yaş ile beraber bir miktar değişiklik gösterebilir. Çalışmamızda genç ve yaşlı olmak üzere iki farklı yaş grubundaki kadınlarda pelvis tiplerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: 18-25 yaş aralığındaki 50 kadın ve 60-70 yaş aralığındaki 50 kadın olmak üzere toplamda 100 kadının görüntülemeleri RadiAnt DICOM Viewer programı aracılığıyla 3 boyutlu hale getirilerek pelvis çapları ölçüldü ve pelvis tipleri belirlendi. Bulgular: Elde edilen pelvis tiplerini karşılaştırdığımızda platypelloid ve gynecoid pelvis tipi sayısı, anthropoid ve android pelvis tipi sayısına net bir üstünlük sağlamıştır. 18-25 yaş aralığında 48 oranla gynecoid tip en çok görülürken android tip 2 oranla en az görülmüştür. 60-70 yaş aralığında 70 oranla platypelloid tip en çok görülürken anthropoid tipe hiç rastlanmamıştır p0.005. Sonuç: Çalışmamızda en çok görülen pelvis tipi platypelloid tiptir. Gynecoid tip ikinci sıradadır. Araştırmamızda 60-70 yaş aralığındaki kadınlarda gynecoid pelvis tipi daha az yaygındır, bu da yaşın pelvik anatomideki değişiklikler üzerinde belirleyici bir etkiye sahip olabileceğini düşündürebilir.

Makale detayları

Examination of Pelvis Diameters and Pelvis Types On 3D Computed Tomography Images

Yazarlar:

Simge Kucuk | Sidar Gedikoglu | Siyabend Civak | Suleyman Aslan | Sevval Ozkale | Sivan Bahceci | Siyar Balli | Taha Ibrahim Hasan Ozturk | Tutku Uykan | Tutku Berra Ozkoc | Ugur Ekin | Yekta Kercek | Ali Murat Koc | Sinan Bakirci

Yayıncı:

Izmir Katip Celebi University

Ana Başlıklar:

Radyoloji ve Organ Görüntüleme | Anatomi

Dergi:

Güncel Tıbbi Araştırmaları Dergisi Vol.4 Issue 3, pp.12-22

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001337914

pISSN:

2791-7061

Pelvis types

Gynecoid

Platypelloid

Android

AnthropoidPelvis tipleri

Gynecoid

Platypelloid

Android

Anthropoid

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Simge Kucuk | Sidar Gedikoglu | Siyabend Civak | Suleyman Aslan | Sevval Ozkale | Sivan Bahceci | Siyar Balli | Taha Ibrahim Hasan Ozturk | Tutku Uykan | Tutku Berra Ozkoc | Ugur Ekin | Yekta Kercek | Ali Murat Koc | Sinan Bakirci

Yayıncı: Izmir Katip Celebi University

Ana Başlıklar: Radyoloji ve Organ Görüntüleme | Anatomi

Dergi: Güncel Tıbbi Araştırmaları Dergisi Vol.4 Issue 3, pp.12-22

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 12/2024

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001337914

pISSN: 2791-7061

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Simge Kucuk | Sidar Gedikoglu | Siyabend Civak | Suleyman Aslan | Sevval Ozkale | Sivan Bahceci | Siyar Balli | Taha Ibrahim Hasan Ozturk | Tutku Uykan | Tutku Berra Ozkoc | Ugur Ekin | Yekta Kercek | Ali Murat Koc | Sinan Bakirci

Yayıncı:

Izmir Katip Celebi University

Ana Başlıklar:

Radyoloji ve Organ Görüntüleme | Anatomi

Dergi:

Güncel Tıbbi Araştırmaları Dergisi Vol.4 Issue 3, pp.12-22

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001337914

pISSN:

2791-7061