Test-Retest Reliability and External Validity of Canadian Diabetes Risk Questionnaire - Turkish

Gamze Ekici; Orkun Aran; Serkan Pekçetin; Berkay Ekici

Makale detayları

Test-Retest Reliability and External Validity of Canadian Diabetes Risk Questionnaire - Turkish

Yazarlar:

Gamze Ekici | Orkun Aran | Serkan Pekçetin | Berkay Ekici

Yayıncı:

Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Dergi:

Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 1, pp.188-198

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001283699

pISSN:

2528-9918

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine the test-retest reliability and external validity of the Canadian Diabetes Risk Questionnaire CanRisk. Materials and Methods: Individuals over 40 years of age without any disease were included in the study. Participants were administered the CanRisk, Nottingham Health Profile NHP, and Visual Analog Scale VAS. CanRisk test-retest validity was calculated with the interclass correlation coefficient ICC, and external validity was calculated with the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: The study included 1349 participants, 549 men and 755 women mean age 50.03  8.05 years. CanRisk test-retest validity was found to be excellent 0.99. Its external validity was evaluated by examining its correlation with NHP, and it was found that there was a statistically significant, positive weak correlation p0.05, r 0.23. Conclusion: CanRisk -TR was found to be a reliable and valid questionnaire to predict diabetes risk.

 Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine the test-retest reliability and external validity of the Canadian Diabetes Risk Questionnaire CanRisk. Materials and Methods: Individuals over 40 years of age without any disease were included in the study. Participants were administered the CanRisk, Nottingham Health Profile NHP, and Visual Analog Scale VAS. CanRisk test-retest validity was calculated with the interclass correlation coefficient ICC, and external validity was calculated with the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: The study included 1349 participants, 549 men and 755 women mean age 50.03  8.05 years. CanRisk test-retest validity was found to be excellent 0.99. Its external validity was evaluated by examining its correlation with NHP, and it was found that there was a statistically significant, positive weak correlation p0.05, r 0.23. Conclusion: CanRisk -TR was found to be a reliable and valid questionnaire to predict diabetes risk.

 Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine the test-retest reliability and external validity of the Canadian Diabetes Risk Questionnaire CanRisk. Materials and Methods: Individuals over 40 years of age without any disease were included in the study. Participants were administered the CanRisk, Nottingham Health Profile NHP, and Visual Analog Scale VAS. CanRisk test-retest validity was calculated with the interclass correlation coefficient ICC, and external validity was calculated with the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: The study included 1349 participants, 549 men and 755 women mean age 50.03  8.05 years. CanRisk test-retest validity was found to be excellent 0.99. Its external validity was evaluated by examining its correlation with NHP, and it was found that there was a statistically significant, positive weak correlation p0.05, r 0.23. Conclusion: CanRisk -TR was found to be a reliable and valid questionnaire to predict diabetes risk.

 Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine the test-retest reliability and external validity of the Canadian Diabetes Risk Questionnaire CanRisk. Materials and Methods: Individuals over 40 years of age without any disease were included in the study. Participants were administered the CanRisk, Nottingham Health Profile NHP, and Visual Analog Scale VAS. CanRisk test-retest validity was calculated with the interclass correlation coefficient ICC, and external validity was calculated with the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: The study included 1349 participants, 549 men and 755 women mean age 50.03  8.05 years. CanRisk test-retest validity was found to be excellent 0.99. Its external validity was evaluated by examining its correlation with NHP, and it was found that there was a statistically significant, positive weak correlation p0.05, r 0.23. Conclusion: CanRisk -TR was found to be a reliable and valid questionnaire to predict diabetes risk.

Makale detayları

Test-Retest Reliability and External Validity of Canadian Diabetes Risk Questionnaire - Turkish

Yazarlar:

Gamze Ekici | Orkun Aran | Serkan Pekçetin | Berkay Ekici

Yayıncı:

Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Dergi:

Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 1, pp.188-198

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001283699

pISSN:

2528-9918

Diabetes Mellitus

Reliability

Validity

Health Risk Assessment

Sayı

Makale detayları

Test-Retest Reliability and External Validity of Canadian Diabetes Risk Questionnaire - Turkish

Yazarlar: Gamze Ekici | Orkun Aran | Serkan Pekçetin | Berkay Ekici

Yayıncı: Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar: Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Dergi: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 1, pp.188-198

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 4/2023

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001283699

pISSN: 2528-9918

Diabetes Mellitus

Reliability

Validity

Health Risk Assessment

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Gamze Ekici | Orkun Aran | Serkan Pekçetin | Berkay Ekici

Yayıncı:

Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Dergi:

Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 1, pp.188-198

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001283699

pISSN:

2528-9918