Depecage: Application of the Laws of Different States to Different Parts of the Same Cause of Action, Especially Analysing the Appearances in Law No. 5718 on Private International and Procedural Law

Hümeyra Zeynep Nalçacıoğlu Erden

Makale detayları

Depecage: Application of the Laws of Different States to Different Parts of the Same Cause of Action, Especially Analysing the Appearances in Law No. 5718 on Private International and Procedural Law

Yazarlar:

Hümeyra Zeynep Nalçacıoğlu Erden

Yayıncı:

Istanbul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Public Law (Other)

Dergi:

İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası Vol.83 Issue 2, pp.506-539

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001360169

pISSN:

2636-7734

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 In disputes involving a foreign element, subjecting the relevant transactions or relations to the law of a single state with which they are most closely connected is preferable to prevent conflicts of law rules of different states and to maintain the balance and integrity of the dispute itself. However, contrary to expectations, the application of the laws of different states to different parts of the same cause of action, both due to the interests protected in private international law and within the framework of the freedom of will granted to the parties, is a frequent situation. Depecage, which can be expressed as the splitting of the applicable law, which emerged as a result of the tort theory of most closely connected law in the American conflict of laws revolution, finds its conceptual equivalent in Turkish law, especially in the form of partial choice of law. However, the concept of depecage is much more comprehensive. This study examines the concept of depecage and reveals its applicability and relevance in the context of Law No. 5718 on Private International and Procedural Law.

 In disputes involving a foreign element, subjecting the relevant transactions or relations to the law of a single state with which they are most closely connected is preferable to prevent conflicts of law rules of different states and to maintain the balance and integrity of the dispute itself. However, contrary to expectations, the application of the laws of different states to different parts of the same cause of action, both due to the interests protected in private international law and within the framework of the freedom of will granted to the parties, is a frequent situation. Depecage, which can be expressed as the splitting of the applicable law, which emerged as a result of the tort theory of most closely connected law in the American conflict of laws revolution, finds its conceptual equivalent in Turkish law, especially in the form of partial choice of law. However, the concept of depecage is much more comprehensive. This study examines the concept of depecage and reveals its applicability and relevance in the context of Law No. 5718 on Private International and Procedural Law.

 In disputes involving a foreign element, subjecting the relevant transactions or relations to the law of a single state with which they are most closely connected is preferable to prevent conflicts of law rules of different states and to maintain the balance and integrity of the dispute itself. However, contrary to expectations, the application of the laws of different states to different parts of the same cause of action, both due to the interests protected in private international law and within the framework of the freedom of will granted to the parties, is a frequent situation. Depecage, which can be expressed as the splitting of the applicable law, which emerged as a result of the tort theory of most closely connected law in the American conflict of laws revolution, finds its conceptual equivalent in Turkish law, especially in the form of partial choice of law. However, the concept of depecage is much more comprehensive. This study examines the concept of depecage and reveals its applicability and relevance in the context of Law No. 5718 on Private International and Procedural Law.

 Yabancılık unsuru içeren uyuşmazlıklarda, farklı devletlere ait hukuk kurallarının çatışmalarını önlemek ve uyuşmazlığın kendi içerisindeki denge ve bütünlüğünü korumak amacıyla ilgili işlem veya ilişkilerin, en sıkı ilişki içerisinde oldukları tek bir devlet hukukuna tâbi tutulmaları tercih edilir. Ancak hem milletlerarası özel hukukta korunan menfaatler gereği hem de taraflara tanınan irade serbestisi çerçevesinde aynı hukuki ilişkiden doğan farklı hukuki kategorilere farklı devlet hukuklarının uygulanması, tahmin edilenin aksine, sıklıkla karşılaşılan bir durumdur. En sıkı ilişkili hukuka dair haksız fiil teorisi ile Amerikan kanunlar ihtilafı devriminin bir sonucu olarak ortaya çıkan uygulanacak hukukun parçalanması olarak ifade edilebilecek depecage, Türk hukukunda özellikle kısmi hukuk seçimi şeklinde kavramsal karşılığını bulmaktadır. Oysa depecage kavramı, çok daha geniş kapsamlı olup işbu çalışmanın amacı, depecage kavramının 5718 sayılı MÖHUK özelinde incelenerek uygulanabilirliğini ve yerindeliğini ortaya koymaktır.

Makale detayları

Depecage: Application of the Laws of Different States to Different Parts of the Same Cause of Action, Especially Analysing the Appearances in Law No. 5718 on Private International and Procedural Law

Yazarlar:

Hümeyra Zeynep Nalçacıoğlu Erden

Yayıncı:

Istanbul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Public Law (Other)

Dergi:

İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası Vol.83 Issue 2, pp.506-539

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001360169

pISSN:

2636-7734

Depecage

Issueby issue analysis

Splitting of the contract

Pick and choose

Partial choice of lawDepecage

Konu bazında değerlendirme

Akdin parçalanması

Parçalama

Kısmi hukuk seçimi

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Hümeyra Zeynep Nalçacıoğlu Erden

Yayıncı: Istanbul University

Ana Başlıklar: Public Law (Other)

Dergi: İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası Vol.83 Issue 2, pp.506-539

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 8/2025

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001360169

pISSN: 2636-7734

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Hümeyra Zeynep Nalçacıoğlu Erden

Yayıncı:

Istanbul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Public Law (Other)

Dergi:

İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası Vol.83 Issue 2, pp.506-539

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001360169

pISSN:

2636-7734