EVALUATION OF THE STRENGTH OF BONDING OF DIFFERENT FLUID RESIN COMPOSITES TO DENTAL TISSUE

Cem Peşkersoy

Makale detayları

EVALUATION OF THE STRENGTH OF BONDING OF DIFFERENT FLUID RESIN COMPOSITES TO DENTAL TISSUE

Yazarlar:

Cem Peşkersoy

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Dentistry

Dergi:

Selcuk Dental Journal Vol.10 Issue 1, pp.30-35

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001288161

pISSN:

2148-7529

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Aim: To comparatively evaluate the micro-shear bond strength of different types of flowable resin composites in enamel and dentin. Materials and Methods: 108 caries-free third molars were randomly divided into 9 groups n12 as 2 subgroups in 4 main groups and 1 control group: Group-VF: Self-adhering flowable resin composite Vertise Flow; Group-GUF: Conventional flowable resin composite G-ænial Universal Flo; Group-MEF: Highly filled flowable resin composite Majesty Es Flow. Group TEF: Bulk-fill flowable resin composite Tetric Evo Flow and Group-CNTRL: Self-adhering flowable resin composite Vertise Flow applied without any bonding stage. As an adhesive system, Single Bond Universal was applied with two different methods in each group and two subgroups were prepared: a Self-Etch application SE, b Etch  Rinse application ER. After the adhesive application phase, composite cylinders were builded-up using Tygon tubes r0.90 mm. The microshear bond strength μSBS of the samples was determined using a universal tester. Data were analyzed with two-way variance ANOVA and post-Hoc Tukey test α0.05. Results: While the μSBS value of the MEFER group in enamel was higher 55.86 MPacm2 compared to the other groups, the highest μSBS value in the dentin tissue was found in the GUFSE group 31.97 MPacm2 p0.05. In all groups, the bond strength of the composites applied with the etch and rinse ER method on the enamel tissue was higher than the self-etch SE method p0.05. The VF group presented the lowest μSBS values when applied with both SE and ER adhesive application methods. Conclusions: Highly filled flowable resin composite presented better bond strength values than bulk-fill and self-adhering flowable composites. The combined use of self-etch universal adhesive system with an acid application etching positively affects the bond strength of flowable resin composites.

 Aim: To comparatively evaluate the micro-shear bond strength of different types of flowable resin composites in enamel and dentin. Materials and Methods: 108 caries-free third molars were randomly divided into 9 groups n12 as 2 subgroups in 4 main groups and 1 control group: Group-VF: Self-adhering flowable resin composite Vertise Flow; Group-GUF: Conventional flowable resin composite G-ænial Universal Flo; Group-MEF: Highly filled flowable resin composite Majesty Es Flow. Group TEF: Bulk-fill flowable resin composite Tetric Evo Flow and Group-CNTRL: Self-adhering flowable resin composite Vertise Flow applied without any bonding stage. As an adhesive system, Single Bond Universal was applied with two different methods in each group and two subgroups were prepared: a Self-Etch application SE, b Etch  Rinse application ER. After the adhesive application phase, composite cylinders were builded-up using Tygon tubes r0.90 mm. The microshear bond strength μSBS of the samples was determined using a universal tester. Data were analyzed with two-way variance ANOVA and post-Hoc Tukey test α0.05. Results: While the μSBS value of the MEFER group in enamel was higher 55.86 MPacm2 compared to the other groups, the highest μSBS value in the dentin tissue was found in the GUFSE group 31.97 MPacm2 p0.05. In all groups, the bond strength of the composites applied with the etch and rinse ER method on the enamel tissue was higher than the self-etch SE method p0.05. The VF group presented the lowest μSBS values when applied with both SE and ER adhesive application methods. Conclusions: Highly filled flowable resin composite presented better bond strength values than bulk-fill and self-adhering flowable composites. The combined use of self-etch universal adhesive system with an acid application etching positively affects the bond strength of flowable resin composites.

 Aim: To comparatively evaluate the micro-shear bond strength of different types of flowable resin composites in enamel and dentin. Materials and Methods: 108 caries-free third molars were randomly divided into 9 groups n12 as 2 subgroups in 4 main groups and 1 control group: Group-VF: Self-adhering flowable resin composite Vertise Flow; Group-GUF: Conventional flowable resin composite G-ænial Universal Flo; Group-MEF: Highly filled flowable resin composite Majesty Es Flow. Group TEF: Bulk-fill flowable resin composite Tetric Evo Flow and Group-CNTRL: Self-adhering flowable resin composite Vertise Flow applied without any bonding stage. As an adhesive system, Single Bond Universal was applied with two different methods in each group and two subgroups were prepared: a Self-Etch application SE, b Etch  Rinse application ER. After the adhesive application phase, composite cylinders were builded-up using Tygon tubes r0.90 mm. The microshear bond strength μSBS of the samples was determined using a universal tester. Data were analyzed with two-way variance ANOVA and post-Hoc Tukey test α0.05. Results: While the μSBS value of the MEFER group in enamel was higher 55.86 MPacm2 compared to the other groups, the highest μSBS value in the dentin tissue was found in the GUFSE group 31.97 MPacm2 p0.05. In all groups, the bond strength of the composites applied with the etch and rinse ER method on the enamel tissue was higher than the self-etch SE method p0.05. The VF group presented the lowest μSBS values when applied with both SE and ER adhesive application methods. Conclusions: Highly filled flowable resin composite presented better bond strength values than bulk-fill and self-adhering flowable composites. The combined use of self-etch universal adhesive system with an acid application etching positively affects the bond strength of flowable resin composites.

 Amaç: Farklı türde akışkan rezin kompozitlerin mine ve dentindeki mikro makaslama bağlanma dayanımını karşılaştırmalı olarak değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Yüz sekiz çürüksüz insan alt 3. büyük azı dişinde hazırlanan örnekler rastgele 4 ana grupta ikişer alt grup ve 1 adet kontrol grubu olacak şekilde 9 gruba n12 ayrıldı : Grup-VF: Kendinden adezivli akışkan rezin kompozit Vertise Flow; Grup-GUF: Geleneksel akışkan rezin kompozit G-ænial Universal Flo; Grup-MEF: Yoğun dolduruculu akışkan rezin kompozit Majesty Es Flow. Grup TEF: Bulk-fill akışkan rezin kompozit Tetric Evo Flow ve Grup-KNTRL: Adezivsiz uygulanan kendinden adezivli akışkan rezin kompozit Vertise Flow. Adeziv sistem olarak Single Bond Universal her grupta iki farklı yöntemle uygulanarak ikişer alt grup hazırlandı : a Self-Etch uygulama SE, b Etch  Rinse asitle ve yıka uygulama ER Tüm gruplarda adeziv sistemin uygulanmasından sonra, iç çapı 0.90 mm. olan Tygon tüpler kullanılarak kompozit silindirler oluşturuldu . Örneklerin mikro makaslama bağ dayanımları μSBS üniversal bir test cihazı kullanılarak belirlendi. Veriler iki yönlü varyans analizi ANOVA ve post-Hoc Tukey testi ile analiz edildi α0.05. Bulgular: MEFER grubunun minedeki μSBS değeri diğer gruplara kıyasla daha yüksek 55.86 MPacm2 bulunmuş iken, dentin dokusunda en yüksek μSBS değerine GUFSE grubunda ulaşıldı 31.97 MPacm2 p0.05. Tüm gruplarda, mine dokusunda etch and rinse ER yöntemiyle uygulanan kompozitlerin bağlanma dayanımı self-etch SE yönteme kıyasla yüksek bulundu p0.05. VF grubunda mine ve dentin dokusunda hem self-etch hem de asitle ve yıka yöntemiyle uygulandığında en düşük μSBS değerlerini gösterdi. Sonuçlar: Doldurucu oranı artırılmış akışkan rezin kompozitler, bulk-fill ve kendinden adezivli akışkan rezin kompozitlere kıyasla daha iyi bir bağlanma dayanımı sergilemiştir. Kendinden asitli üniversal adeziv sistemin asitle kombine uygulanması akışkan rezin kompozitlerin bağlanma dayanımını olumlu yönde etkilemektedir.

Makale detayları

EVALUATION OF THE STRENGTH OF BONDING OF DIFFERENT FLUID RESIN COMPOSITES TO DENTAL TISSUE

Yazarlar:

Cem Peşkersoy

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Dentistry

Dergi:

Selcuk Dental Journal Vol.10 Issue 1, pp.30-35

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001288161

pISSN:

2148-7529

Self-adhering flowable composite

bulk-fill flowable composite

micro-shear bond strength

universal adhesive.Kendinden adezivli akışkan kompozit

bulk-fill akışkan kompozit

mikro-makaslama bağ dayanımı

universal adeziv.

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Cem Peşkersoy

Yayıncı: Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar: Dentistry

Dergi: Selcuk Dental Journal Vol.10 Issue 1, pp.30-35

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 4/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001288161

pISSN: 2148-7529

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Cem Peşkersoy

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Dentistry

Dergi:

Selcuk Dental Journal Vol.10 Issue 1, pp.30-35

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001288161

pISSN:

2148-7529