Indications of Inclination Towards Sunni Thought in Zaidi Hadith Commentary: A Comparison Between Yahya ibn Hussein (d. 298/911) and Ahmed ibn Suleiman (d. 566/1171)

Semih Yolaçan

Makale detayları

Indications of Inclination Towards Sunni Thought in Zaidi Hadith Commentary: A Comparison Between Yahya ibn Hussein (d. 298/911) and Ahmed ibn Suleiman (d. 566/1171)

Yazarlar:

Semih Yolaçan

Yayıncı:

Dokuz Eylul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hadis

Dergi:

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Issue 59, pp.203-224

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321294

pISSN:

1303-3344

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The Zaidiyya sect, traced back to Zayd ibn Ali d. 122740, draws attention with its approach during the era of Yahya ibn Hussein d. 298911, emphasizing the submission of hadiths to the scrutiny of the Quran and prioritizing critical reasoning in determining their authenticity. Accordingly, scholars within this sect tend to adopt a sharp and unequivocal rejection style towards narrations conflicting with their views. The question arises whether this style has persisted uniformly or if there has been a shift in discourse, particularly towards other factions within Zaidi thought and, more notably, towards Sunni perspectives. The aim of this article is to address this question. Therefore, a comparison is made between Yahya ibn Hussein, who lived in the 3rd century of the Hijra, and Ahmed ibn Suleiman d. 5661171, who lived in the 6th century of the Hijra, in an attempt to uncover an answer to this question. Our study is conducted within the framework of Yahya ibn Husseins works, Kitabul-Ahkam and el-Muntehab, along with Ahmed ibn Suleimans compilation of legal traditions in his work Usulul-Ahkam. The subject is approached through two main headings: the differing rulings of the two scholars and their distinct interpretations of the same rulings, followed by subheadings elucidating these aspects.

 The Zaidiyya sect, traced back to Zayd ibn Ali d. 122740, draws attention with its approach during the era of Yahya ibn Hussein d. 298911, emphasizing the submission of hadiths to the scrutiny of the Quran and prioritizing critical reasoning in determining their authenticity. Accordingly, scholars within this sect tend to adopt a sharp and unequivocal rejection style towards narrations conflicting with their views. The question arises whether this style has persisted uniformly or if there has been a shift in discourse, particularly towards other factions within Zaidi thought and, more notably, towards Sunni perspectives. The aim of this article is to address this question. Therefore, a comparison is made between Yahya ibn Hussein, who lived in the 3rd century of the Hijra, and Ahmed ibn Suleiman d. 5661171, who lived in the 6th century of the Hijra, in an attempt to uncover an answer to this question. Our study is conducted within the framework of Yahya ibn Husseins works, Kitabul-Ahkam and el-Muntehab, along with Ahmed ibn Suleimans compilation of legal traditions in his work Usulul-Ahkam. The subject is approached through two main headings: the differing rulings of the two scholars and their distinct interpretations of the same rulings, followed by subheadings elucidating these aspects.

 The Zaidiyya sect, traced back to Zayd ibn Ali d. 122740, draws attention with its approach during the era of Yahya ibn Hussein d. 298911, emphasizing the submission of hadiths to the scrutiny of the Quran and prioritizing critical reasoning in determining their authenticity. Accordingly, scholars within this sect tend to adopt a sharp and unequivocal rejection style towards narrations conflicting with their views. The question arises whether this style has persisted uniformly or if there has been a shift in discourse, particularly towards other factions within Zaidi thought and, more notably, towards Sunni perspectives. The aim of this article is to address this question. Therefore, a comparison is made between Yahya ibn Hussein, who lived in the 3rd century of the Hijra, and Ahmed ibn Suleiman d. 5661171, who lived in the 6th century of the Hijra, in an attempt to uncover an answer to this question. Our study is conducted within the framework of Yahya ibn Husseins works, Kitabul-Ahkam and el-Muntehab, along with Ahmed ibn Suleimans compilation of legal traditions in his work Usulul-Ahkam. The subject is approached through two main headings: the differing rulings of the two scholars and their distinct interpretations of the same rulings, followed by subheadings elucidating these aspects.

 Kuruluşu Zeyd b. Aliye öl. 122740 dayandırılan Zeydiyye mezhebi, Yahyâ b. Hüseyin öl. 298911 döneminde hadislerin sıhhatini belirlemede Kurana arzı ve eleştirel aklı önceleyen yapısıyla dikkatleri çekmektedir. Buna göre muhaddisler görüşlerine muhalif olan rivayetleri keskin bir dille reddetme üslubunu tercih etmektedir. Peki, bu üslup aynı şekilde devam etmiş midir yoksa Zeydî düşünce içerisinde diğer fraksiyonlara, özellikle de Ehl-i sünnet düşüncesine yaklaşılarak bir söylem değişikliği olmuş mudur? Makalenin amacı bu soruya cevap bulmaktır. Bu sebeple Hicrî 3. Asırda yaşamış Zeydî âlim Yahyâ b. Hüseyin ile Hicrî 6. Asırda yaşamış olan Ahmed b. Süleyman öl. 5661171 arasında bir karşılaştırma yapılarak sorunun cevabı ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Çalışmamızı Yahyâ b. Hüseyinin Kitabül-ahkâm ve el-Müntehab adlı eserleri ile Ahmed b. Süleymanın ahkâm hadislerini derlediği Usulül-ahkâm adlı eseri çerçevesinde yaptık. Konuyu iki ilim adamının farklı hükümleri ve aynı hükümlere farklı yorumları şeklinde iki ana başlık ve bunları takip eden alt başlıklar şeklinde ele aldık.

Makale detayları

Indications of Inclination Towards Sunni Thought in Zaidi Hadith Commentary: A Comparison Between Yahya ibn Hussein (d. 298/911) and Ahmed ibn Suleiman (d. 566/1171)

Yazarlar:

Semih Yolaçan

Yayıncı:

Dokuz Eylul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hadis

Dergi:

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Issue 59, pp.203-224

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321294

pISSN:

1303-3344

Hadith

Zadiyya

Yahya b. Husein

Ahmad b. Suleiman

Hadith interpretationHadis

Zeydiyye

Yahyâ b. Hüseyin

Ahmed b. Süleyman

Hadis yorumu

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Semih Yolaçan

Yayıncı: Dokuz Eylul University

Ana Başlıklar: Hadis

Dergi: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Issue 59, pp.203-224

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001321294

pISSN: 1303-3344

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Semih Yolaçan

Yayıncı:

Dokuz Eylul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hadis

Dergi:

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Issue 59, pp.203-224

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321294

pISSN:

1303-3344