A Comparison Between Karl Marx’s Conflict Approach and the Kemal Tahir-Baykan Sezer Line

Berkay Çetin; Nevin Güngör Ergan

Makale detayları

A Comparison Between Karl Marx’s Conflict Approach and the Kemal Tahir-Baykan Sezer Line

Yazarlar:

Berkay Çetin | Nevin Güngör Ergan

Yayıncı:

Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sosyoloji

Dergi:

Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.40 Issue 2, pp.558-576

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001291197

pISSN:

1301-5737

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The conflict approach has been widely discussed in the iteratüre of the social sciences, particularly in sociology. There are many different names and approaches within the conflict approach. In this study, in particular, the East-West Conflict Theory, which Baykan Sezer has brought to the sociology iteratüre, influenced by Kemal Tahirs thoughts, and Karl Marxs conflict approach, are discussed. In the study, document analysis technique was used in relation to hermeneutic approach. Primary and secondary sources were examined in this context. The Sociology Annuals, which were started by Baykan Sezer and continue to be published today, were considered as the main source. Within the scope of the study, firstly, Karl Marxs conflict approach was briefly summarized, and then the prominent themes in the Kemal Tahir-Baykan Sezer line were dealt with. These themes were discussed around the titles of the importance of the historical perspective, emphasis on originality, consideration of the interests of the Turkish people, and the position of Western thought and science. Then, the main breaking points in the history of the East-West conflict were summarized. In the study of the history of the East-West conflict, the studies in the The Sociology Annuals were particularly taken into consideration. As a result of the study, the conflict approach in the Kemal Tahir-Baykan Sezer line was compared with Marxs approach. As a result of the comparison, it was found that there are both similarities and differences between these approaches. The existence of conflict is present in both approaches. In addition, both Karl Marx and Kemal Tahir and Baykan Sezer have made criticism of the hegemonic science. The differences that emerge in the Kemal Tahir-Baykan Sezer line are particularly visible in the point where the Turkish society and history in general, also the East do not match exactly with Western concepts and schemes.

 The conflict approach has been widely discussed in the iteratüre of the social sciences, particularly in sociology. There are many different names and approaches within the conflict approach. In this study, in particular, the East-West Conflict Theory, which Baykan Sezer has brought to the sociology iteratüre, influenced by Kemal Tahirs thoughts, and Karl Marxs conflict approach, are discussed. In the study, document analysis technique was used in relation to hermeneutic approach. Primary and secondary sources were examined in this context. The Sociology Annuals, which were started by Baykan Sezer and continue to be published today, were considered as the main source. Within the scope of the study, firstly, Karl Marxs conflict approach was briefly summarized, and then the prominent themes in the Kemal Tahir-Baykan Sezer line were dealt with. These themes were discussed around the titles of the importance of the historical perspective, emphasis on originality, consideration of the interests of the Turkish people, and the position of Western thought and science. Then, the main breaking points in the history of the East-West conflict were summarized. In the study of the history of the East-West conflict, the studies in the The Sociology Annuals were particularly taken into consideration. As a result of the study, the conflict approach in the Kemal Tahir-Baykan Sezer line was compared with Marxs approach. As a result of the comparison, it was found that there are both similarities and differences between these approaches. The existence of conflict is present in both approaches. In addition, both Karl Marx and Kemal Tahir and Baykan Sezer have made criticism of the hegemonic science. The differences that emerge in the Kemal Tahir-Baykan Sezer line are particularly visible in the point where the Turkish society and history in general, also the East do not match exactly with Western concepts and schemes.

 The conflict approach has been widely discussed in the iteratüre of the social sciences, particularly in sociology. There are many different names and approaches within the conflict approach. In this study, in particular, the East-West Conflict Theory, which Baykan Sezer has brought to the sociology iteratüre, influenced by Kemal Tahirs thoughts, and Karl Marxs conflict approach, are discussed. In the study, document analysis technique was used in relation to hermeneutic approach. Primary and secondary sources were examined in this context. The Sociology Annuals, which were started by Baykan Sezer and continue to be published today, were considered as the main source. Within the scope of the study, firstly, Karl Marxs conflict approach was briefly summarized, and then the prominent themes in the Kemal Tahir-Baykan Sezer line were dealt with. These themes were discussed around the titles of the importance of the historical perspective, emphasis on originality, consideration of the interests of the Turkish people, and the position of Western thought and science. Then, the main breaking points in the history of the East-West conflict were summarized. In the study of the history of the East-West conflict, the studies in the The Sociology Annuals were particularly taken into consideration. As a result of the study, the conflict approach in the Kemal Tahir-Baykan Sezer line was compared with Marxs approach. As a result of the comparison, it was found that there are both similarities and differences between these approaches. The existence of conflict is present in both approaches. In addition, both Karl Marx and Kemal Tahir and Baykan Sezer have made criticism of the hegemonic science. The differences that emerge in the Kemal Tahir-Baykan Sezer line are particularly visible in the point where the Turkish society and history in general, also the East do not match exactly with Western concepts and schemes.

 Çatışmacı yaklaşım, genel olarak sosyal bilimler, özel olarak da sosyoloji literatüründe oldukça tartışılmıştır. Çatışmacı yaklaşım içerisinde birçok farklı isim ve gelenek bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada ise özellikle Baykan Sezerin, Kemal Tahirin düşüncelerinden etkilenerek sosyoloji literatürüne kazandırdığı Doğu-Batı Çatışması Teorisi ile Karl Marxın çatışmacı yaklaşımı tartışmaya tabi tutulmuştur. Çalışmada, yorumsamacı geleneğe dayalı olarak doküman analizi tekniğinden yararlanılmıştır. Bu kapsamda birincil ve ikincil kaynaklar incelenmiştir. Baykan Sezer tarafından yayımlanmaya başlanan ve günümüzde yayına devam eden Sosyoloji Yıllıkları, temel kaynak olarak dikkate alınmıştır. Çalışma kapsamında, öncelikle Karl Marxın çatışmacı yaklaşımı kısaca özetlenmiş, sonrasında Kemal Tahir-Baykan Sezer çizgisindeki belirgin temalar ele alınmıştır. Söz konusu temalar; tarihin gerekliliği; özgünlük vurgusu; Türk insanının çıkarlarını gözetmek; Batı düşünü ve bilimi karşısındaki konum başlıkları etrafında tartışılmıştır. Sonrasında ise Doğu-Batı çatışmasının tarihinde belli başlı kırılma noktaları özetlenmiştir. Doğu-Batı çatışmasının tarihine ilişkin olarak özellikle Sosyoloji Yıllıklarındaki çalışmalar dikkate alınmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda Kemal Tahir-Baykan Sezer çizgisindeki çatışmacı yaklaşım Marxın yaklaşımı ile kıyaslanmıştır. Yapılan kıyaslama neticesinde, söz konusu yaklaşımlar arasında benzerliklerin olduğu gibi farklılıkların da olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Özellikle çatışmanın varlığı, iki yaklaşımda da mevcuttur. Ayrıca hem Karl Marx hem de Kemal Tahir ve Baykan Sezer tarafından hâkimegemen bilim anlayışına yönelik eleştiri getirilmiştir. Kemal Tahir-Baykan Sezer çizgisinde ortaya çıkan farklılıkların ise bilhassa Türk toplumu ve tarihinin genel itibarıyla da Doğunun Batılı kavram ve şemalarla birebir örtüşmemesi noktasında görünürlük kazandığı gözlemlenmiştir.

Makale detayları

A Comparison Between Karl Marx’s Conflict Approach and the Kemal Tahir-Baykan Sezer Line

Yazarlar:

Berkay Çetin | Nevin Güngör Ergan

Yayıncı:

Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sosyoloji

Dergi:

Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.40 Issue 2, pp.558-576

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001291197

pISSN:

1301-5737

Kemal Tahir

Baykan Sezer

The Kemal Tahir-Baykan Sezer line

Karl Marx

the conflict approach

the East-West conflict theoryKemal Tahir

Baykan Sezer

Kemal Tahir-Baykan Sezer çizgisi

Karl Marx

çatışmacı yaklaşım

Doğu-Batı çatışması teorisi

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Berkay Çetin | Nevin Güngör Ergan

Yayıncı: Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar: Sosyoloji

Dergi: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.40 Issue 2, pp.558-576

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 12/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001291197

pISSN: 1301-5737

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Berkay Çetin | Nevin Güngör Ergan

Yayıncı:

Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sosyoloji

Dergi:

Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.40 Issue 2, pp.558-576

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001291197

pISSN:

1301-5737