An Examination on Whether the Debt Collector Has the Authority to Remove the Lawyer from the Seized Property

Betül Azakli Arslan

Makale detayları

An Examination on Whether the Debt Collector Has the Authority to Remove the Lawyer from the Seized Property

Yazarlar:

Betül Azakli Arslan

Yayıncı:

Ankara University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.74 Issue 1, pp.413-442

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

11/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001350212

pISSN:

1301-1308

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The legal profession plays a crucial role in ensuring the effective exercise of the rights to claim and defense, while also contributing to the provision and functioning of justice services, thus serving as a public service in essence. Indeed, due to the nature of the services rendered, certain rights and powers have been granted to the lawyer Attorney Act, Art. 34 et seq.. Since the lawyers duty is carried out with complete independence, the restriction of use of these rights and powers is only possible if it is explicitly stipulated by law. The independence of the lawyer should be ensured in front of the debt collectors. However, in some cases, the protection of the lawyers independence and the powers of the debt collector may conflict. This study examines whether the debt collector has the authority to remove the lawyer from seized property. Firstly, it is revealed that the lawyer has the authority to be present at seized property. Subsequently, the boundaries of the debt collectors authority to manage the seizure were defined. Finally, the need for a regulation regarding the sanctions that the debt collector may impose during actions that disrupt order at seized property has been highlighted.

 The legal profession plays a crucial role in ensuring the effective exercise of the rights to claim and defense, while also contributing to the provision and functioning of justice services, thus serving as a public service in essence. Indeed, due to the nature of the services rendered, certain rights and powers have been granted to the lawyer Attorney Act, Art. 34 et seq.. Since the lawyers duty is carried out with complete independence, the restriction of use of these rights and powers is only possible if it is explicitly stipulated by law. The independence of the lawyer should be ensured in front of the debt collectors. However, in some cases, the protection of the lawyers independence and the powers of the debt collector may conflict. This study examines whether the debt collector has the authority to remove the lawyer from seized property. Firstly, it is revealed that the lawyer has the authority to be present at seized property. Subsequently, the boundaries of the debt collectors authority to manage the seizure were defined. Finally, the need for a regulation regarding the sanctions that the debt collector may impose during actions that disrupt order at seized property has been highlighted.

 The legal profession plays a crucial role in ensuring the effective exercise of the rights to claim and defense, while also contributing to the provision and functioning of justice services, thus serving as a public service in essence. Indeed, due to the nature of the services rendered, certain rights and powers have been granted to the lawyer Attorney Act, Art. 34 et seq.. Since the lawyers duty is carried out with complete independence, the restriction of use of these rights and powers is only possible if it is explicitly stipulated by law. The independence of the lawyer should be ensured in front of the debt collectors. However, in some cases, the protection of the lawyers independence and the powers of the debt collector may conflict. This study examines whether the debt collector has the authority to remove the lawyer from seized property. Firstly, it is revealed that the lawyer has the authority to be present at seized property. Subsequently, the boundaries of the debt collectors authority to manage the seizure were defined. Finally, the need for a regulation regarding the sanctions that the debt collector may impose during actions that disrupt order at seized property has been highlighted.

 Avukatlık mesleği ile iddia ve savunma hakkının etkin bir şekilde kullanılmasını sağlamanın yanı sıra adalet hizmetlerinin ifasına ve işleyişine katkıda bulunularak, adeta bir kamu hizmeti ifa edilmektedir. Nitekim yürütülen hizmetin niteliği gereğince de avukata birtakım hak ve yetkiler tanınmıştır Av. K. m. 34 vd. Bu hak ve yetkilerin kullanılmasının engellenmesi, avukatın görevinin ifası sırasında tam bağımsızlığı söz konusu olduğundan ancak kanun hükmünde açıkça öngörülmeleri hâlinde mümkündür. Avukata tanınan bağımsızlık, adalet hizmetlerinin ifasına katılan icra memurlarının karşısında da mevcuttur. Ancak bazı hâllerde avukatın bağımsızlığının korunması ile icra memurunun yetkileri çatışma içinde bulunabilmektedir. Bu çerçevede, çalışmada icra memurunun alacaklı vekilini haciz mahallinden çıkarma yetkisinin bulunup bulunmadığı incelenmiştir. Öncelikle icra mahallinin konut olması hâlinde, avukatın haciz mahallinde bulunma yetkisi ortaya konulmuştur. Avukatın haciz mahallinde bulunma yetkisinin varlığı tespit edilirken Avukatlık Kanununda sayılan yetkileri ve bu yetkilerin ifası sırasındaki hukukî statüsü dikkate alınmıştır. Ardından, icra memurunun haczi sevk ve idare yetkisinin sınırları belirlenmiştir. Son olarak icra mahallinde düzeni bozucu hareketlerde bulunulması hâlinde icra memurunun uygulayabileceği yaptırımlara ilişkin kanunî düzenleme ihtiyacı ortaya konulmuştur.

Makale detayları

An Examination on Whether the Debt Collector Has the Authority to Remove the Lawyer from the Seized Property

Yazarlar:

Betül Azakli Arslan

Yayıncı:

Ankara University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.74 Issue 1, pp.413-442

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

11/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001350212

pISSN:

1301-1308

Debt Collector

Seizure at the Residence

Balance of Interests

Attorneyship Law

Right to Legal Remediesİcra Memuru

Konutta Haciz

Menfaat Dengesi

Avukatlık Hukuku

Hak Arama Özgürlüğü

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Betül Azakli Arslan

Yayıncı: Ankara University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi: Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.74 Issue 1, pp.413-442

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 11/2025

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001350212

pISSN: 1301-1308

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Betül Azakli Arslan

Yayıncı:

Ankara University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.74 Issue 1, pp.413-442

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

11/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001350212

pISSN:

1301-1308