Comparative Analysis of Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Methods in Ağrı Cement Factory: Fine-Kinney vs. 3T Approach

Azize İnanlı; Okan Özbakır

Makale detayları

Comparative Analysis of Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Methods in Ağrı Cement Factory: Fine-Kinney vs. 3T Approach

Yazarlar:

Azize İnanlı | Okan Özbakır

Yayıncı:

Giresun University

Ana Başlıklar:

Malzeme Üretim Teknolojileri

Dergi:

Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Vol.14 Issue 2, pp.448-467

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001319675

pISSN:

2564-7377

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Occupational health and safety is essential to protect, maintain and improve the physical, psychological and social well-being of employees and to prevent harmful factors. One way to prevent occupational hazards is to identify them in the workplace. Therefore, providing information to assist in making the necessary decisions to reduce occupational hazards, and conducting hazard identification and risk assessment will contribute significantly. In this study, the risks identified at Ağrı Cement Factory were classified using the Fine-Kinney method and the 3T risk assessment method, and the results were compared. The 3T method is superior to the Fine-Kinney method because of its modular structure. The high risks that require immediate action in the Fine-Kinney method appear to be prioritized similarly in the 3T method as well. However, in the Fine-Kinney method, significant, possible, and risks are considered among the top 3 priority risks, while in the 3T method, they are considered among the top 2 priority risks. It has been observed that a risk assessment utilizing the Fine-Kinney method will be successful if continuously updated. Difficulty in selecting the probability component has led to elevating risk values in the Fine-Kinney risk assessments by selecting a higher level of risk. Although both methods exhibit different approaches, the 3T methodology has been understood to provide a comprehensive perspective by considering risk in terms of threat, performance, and harm. This approach has addressed different dimensions to understand the origins, impacts, and consequences of risks. On the other hand, the Fine-Kinney Risk Assessment Method, relying on weighting and scoring factors specific to project characteristics and factors, has been reported to evaluate risk in a more analytical manner. It has been concluded that this methodology will be successful in calculating risk scores by considering specific project characteristics and risk profiles.

 Occupational health and safety is essential to protect, maintain and improve the physical, psychological and social well-being of employees and to prevent harmful factors. One way to prevent occupational hazards is to identify them in the workplace. Therefore, providing information to assist in making the necessary decisions to reduce occupational hazards, and conducting hazard identification and risk assessment will contribute significantly. In this study, the risks identified at Ağrı Cement Factory were classified using the Fine-Kinney method and the 3T risk assessment method, and the results were compared. The 3T method is superior to the Fine-Kinney method because of its modular structure. The high risks that require immediate action in the Fine-Kinney method appear to be prioritized similarly in the 3T method as well. However, in the Fine-Kinney method, significant, possible, and risks are considered among the top 3 priority risks, while in the 3T method, they are considered among the top 2 priority risks. It has been observed that a risk assessment utilizing the Fine-Kinney method will be successful if continuously updated. Difficulty in selecting the probability component has led to elevating risk values in the Fine-Kinney risk assessments by selecting a higher level of risk. Although both methods exhibit different approaches, the 3T methodology has been understood to provide a comprehensive perspective by considering risk in terms of threat, performance, and harm. This approach has addressed different dimensions to understand the origins, impacts, and consequences of risks. On the other hand, the Fine-Kinney Risk Assessment Method, relying on weighting and scoring factors specific to project characteristics and factors, has been reported to evaluate risk in a more analytical manner. It has been concluded that this methodology will be successful in calculating risk scores by considering specific project characteristics and risk profiles.

 Occupational health and safety is essential to protect, maintain and improve the physical, psychological and social well-being of employees and to prevent harmful factors. One way to prevent occupational hazards is to identify them in the workplace. Therefore, providing information to assist in making the necessary decisions to reduce occupational hazards, and conducting hazard identification and risk assessment will contribute significantly. In this study, the risks identified at Ağrı Cement Factory were classified using the Fine-Kinney method and the 3T risk assessment method, and the results were compared. The 3T method is superior to the Fine-Kinney method because of its modular structure. The high risks that require immediate action in the Fine-Kinney method appear to be prioritized similarly in the 3T method as well. However, in the Fine-Kinney method, significant, possible, and risks are considered among the top 3 priority risks, while in the 3T method, they are considered among the top 2 priority risks. It has been observed that a risk assessment utilizing the Fine-Kinney method will be successful if continuously updated. Difficulty in selecting the probability component has led to elevating risk values in the Fine-Kinney risk assessments by selecting a higher level of risk. Although both methods exhibit different approaches, the 3T methodology has been understood to provide a comprehensive perspective by considering risk in terms of threat, performance, and harm. This approach has addressed different dimensions to understand the origins, impacts, and consequences of risks. On the other hand, the Fine-Kinney Risk Assessment Method, relying on weighting and scoring factors specific to project characteristics and factors, has been reported to evaluate risk in a more analytical manner. It has been concluded that this methodology will be successful in calculating risk scores by considering specific project characteristics and risk profiles.

 İş sağlığı ve güvenliği, çalışanların fiziksel, psikolojik ve sosyal iyilik hallerinin korunması, sürdürülmesi, geliştirilmesi ve zararlı faktörlerin önlenmesi açısından şarttır. Mesleki tehlikeleri önlemenin bir yolu onları işyerinde tanımlamaktır. Bu nedenle mesleki tehlikelerin azaltılması için gerekli kararların alınmasına yardımcı olacak bilgilerin sağlanması, tehlike tanımlama ve risk değerlendirmesinin yapılması önemli katkı sağlayacaktır. Bu çalışmada Ağrı Çimento Fabrikasında tespit edilen riskler Fine-Kinney yöntemi ve 3T risk değerlendirme yöntemi kullanılarak sınıflandırılmış ve sonuçlar karşılaştırılmıştır. 3T yöntemi modüler yapısından dolayı Fine-Kinney yöntemine göre daha üstün olduğu görülmüştür. Fine kinney metodunda hemen önlem alınması gereken yüksek riskler 3T yönteminde de öncelikli olarak görünmektedir. Ancak Fine-Kinney yönteminde önemli, olası ve riskler ilk 3. öncelikli risk arasında değerlendirilirken, 3T yönteminde ise ilk 2. öncelikli risk arasında değerlendirilmektedir. Fine-Kinney yöntemini kullanan risk değerlendirmesi, sürekli güncellendiği takdirde başarılı olacağı görülmüştür. Olasılık bileşeninin seçiminde zorluk yaşandığında bir üst düzeyde bir risk değeri seçilmesi fine kinney risk değerlerini yükseltmiştir. Her iki yöntem de farklı yaklaşımlar gösterseler de 3T metodolojisi, riski tehdit, performans ve zarar açısından ele alarak kapsamlı bir bakış açısı sağladığı anlaşılmıştır. Bu yaklaşım, risklerin kökenini, etkilerini ve sonuçlarını anlamak için farklı boyutlarını ele almıştır. Fine-Kinney Risk Değerlendirme Yöntemi ise proje özelliklerine ve faktörlere özel ağırlıklandırma ve puanlama faktörlerini temel alarak riski daha analitik bir şekilde değerlendirdiği rapor edilmiştir. Bu metodoloji, projelerin belirli özelliklerini ve risk profillerini dikkate alarak risk puanlarını hesaplamada başarılı olacağı kanaatine varılmıştır.

Makale detayları

Comparative Analysis of Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Methods in Ağrı Cement Factory: Fine-Kinney vs. 3T Approach

Yazarlar:

Azize İnanlı | Okan Özbakır

Yayıncı:

Giresun University

Ana Başlıklar:

Malzeme Üretim Teknolojileri

Dergi:

Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Vol.14 Issue 2, pp.448-467

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001319675

pISSN:

2564-7377

Fine-Kinney

3T

Risk Assessments

occupational health and safetyFine-Kinney

3T

Risk Değerlendirme

İş sağlığı ve güvenliği

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Azize İnanlı | Okan Özbakır

Yayıncı: Giresun University

Ana Başlıklar: Malzeme Üretim Teknolojileri

Dergi: Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Vol.14 Issue 2, pp.448-467

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2024

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001319675

pISSN: 2564-7377

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Azize İnanlı | Okan Özbakır

Yayıncı:

Giresun University

Ana Başlıklar:

Malzeme Üretim Teknolojileri

Dergi:

Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Vol.14 Issue 2, pp.448-467

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001319675

pISSN:

2564-7377